The Second Bolshevik Revolution - Part 2
I have been a theistic Satanist on two occasions now but I am happy being put into the Christianity camp. The question that should be asked (and what you might wish to ask me) is 'is this the end times?' I cannot and will not give you some simplistic yes/no answer, for me to answer this I will have to give you some background of the mechanics involved. It is not a simple matter of God versus Satan because you first must understand that "God" and "Satan" are titles not names. All titles are subject to challenge and turnover as history does show; if we take for example the Queen of England, she will inevitably die and a new person will take her place. Anyone can claim to be God and again history shows that there are people who have taken it upon themselves to do so. But what about the title of Satan? In regarding this we have to delve into the Kabbalah, the Tree of Life and the sephiroth. The Tree of Life includes sections (sephiroth) which are ruled by different personas of God that we can relate to, the unity of God is one but the personas were made for us because to comprehend God as a singular entity would simply be too great for us to understand.
But there is a counterfeit in this, it is called the Tree of Death. It is not governed by a singular entity but a series of them in the sephiroth. The highest sephira or section is called Thaumiel and it is jointly ruled by Lucifer and Moloch, there is a 'sort of' rivalry between them as the 'better man' can call themself the Satan and hold that title. So in an endtime scenario so far we have God VS the Satan vs the other, or God vs Moloch and Lucifer. But we also have another challenger in this mix - atheism. Although atheism wishes to portray itself as some sort of 'humanistic evolutionary progress' for all human kind, the fact is that they are just disposable stooges much like suicide bombers. Whether atheists want to hear it or not or accept it or not, I can and will tell you that Karl Marx was a Satanist and the compulsory enforced atheism that you are pushing is nothing to do with 'liberating humanity'. It is just a part of the war against God, and just because you are against God that doesn't mean that you gain any favour with Satanists or Satanism. The saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is no longer true, because now "The enemy of my enemy is just another enemy" applies. So this idea that these "progressives" seem to hold of 'everything against God' will lead to utopia has to be one of the most imbecilic infantile beliefs I have ever encountered. And I can tell you this from firsthand experience that theistic Satanists absolutely loathe atheists and put them on the same level as devout Christians, Muslims and indeed other God believing religions to be exterminated. You are either with the Satan or you are dead, it is as simple as that.
Monday 6 April 2020
Sunday 5 April 2020
The Second Bolshevik Revolution
The Second Bolshevik Revolution
Here in Sydney, Australia we have an unofficial martial law. This is supposed to combat a supposed disease that was originally called "Corona Virus" but is now commonly referred to as CoV-19. The measures we have today do not really bear any resemblance to measures used in the days of polio. There were no such "self-containment" measures we see today unless one was quite obviously infected and ill, today we have people hiding under beds in a foetal position sucking their thumbs waiting for the big bad virus to come and get'em. So not only do we have the government imposing martial law via the police outside the home, we have people imposing it on themselves with the virus as the enforcer. Now we have self appointed vigilante enforcers, the sort of people who use their Iphones to take a pic or make a video of those who they think 'violate the rules'. We are now in a situation where the bad old days of the ComBloc societies of Eastern Europe are resurrecting themselves in the West and the entire world.
What people should understand is that the Russian Revolution in 1917 to overthrow the Czar was not just one revolution but in fact two. The first one overthrew the Czar and established a provisional government, but the second one (the Bolshevik Revolution) overthrew the provisional government and brought in a purely Marxist system of government. But the Bolshevik Revolution was not just meant to take the Russian Empire, it was actually meant to take all of Europe and by default the colonies and territories those states ruled or administered. There were temporary 'revolutionary states' set up in Hungary and Bavaria but these were overthrown rather quickly, the now Soviet Union then invaded Poland (engineered by Trotsky) but was defeated. All these attempts to engineer a world government under Trotskyite ideology occurred 100 years ago, and it seems like we are getting a second attempt under the United Nations.
So in Australia under the CoV-19 containment rules be have seen religious services basically outlawed, private enterprise shutdown, freedom of association demolished. We have rules/laws that dictate you cannot be within 1.5 metres of another person, if you violate this you will be either fined $1000 or imprisoned for 6 months. Looking at this situation you would be breaking the law if you slept with your spouse, and that will be the next target; there will be no concept of privacy in a global Bolshevik state. Trotsky and Pol Pot may be dead but there plenty of others who think they are entitled to demand to take their place. The measures and unofficial curfews we have in place at the moment are meant to last 6 months, but the general inference says this will go beyond that. This is not about fighting a disease that cannot be defined, but is about containment of a population in order to establish indoctrination and an authoritarian state. Really the authoritarian state is not a sovereign state per se, but really just an administrated section of a greater world government just like the state or province of a nation.
People have always expected that if a global government were to occur that it would be done under a blatantly Marxist or otherwise leftist agenda. But it has mostly been done under conservative or right wing agendas. Either way the globalist agenda would be completed, under a leftist agenda the United Nations would implement a world government (which it was designed to do under the League of Nations) and this would be done by social government. Under a right wing agenda it would be done by economic governance. Either way these measures are just of personal preference to those implementing it, and really looking between the left and right wings of politics they both have similar aims just a different order of preference. If we were to use the example of a bird as a model we would see the left and right wings, but in order for a body to function it needs a head and a brain that is separate to the wings but yet overrides them. This is where the strategies of both the left and right wings fail. I will give this example in regards to "womens rights", the leftists said that womens rights were about human equality and the right for equal pay. The right wing said it was about economic growth and expenditure - both are valid aims without any other factors involved. However the aim of this was to take women out of the house, and this resulted in women not raising their children but delegating that to others such as maids and servants and the state. The very things that 'financial liberation' was supposed to eliminate from the lives of women. Now by default the state is the family, and factors such as raising children with certain mindsets while preserving their individuality has been left to the state which has delegated these to their employees and their personal tastes and perversions.
Hence this is the reason why atheism, earth worship (the global warming thing wasn't achieving the grand aim hence the "submit to us or the virus gonna kill ya!!!" mental indoctrination pandemic occurring), various sexual dysmorphia fads, compulsory homosexuality and other life altering trends which may have permanent or fatal consequences. Some will excuse these things as the "evolutionary progress of humanity" and that it is a natural occurrence. But the natural occurrence of these things in human beings is very, very small. It does not need to be indoctrinated into people and indeed children, there is no benefit in doing this unless you intend to use these dysfunctional behaviours against them and indeed others. These are the sort of measures you would use in an insurgency or revolution, and much like the provisional revolutionies that other threw the Czar these revolutionaries will find out they are disposable. It isn't a matter of them finding themselves suddenly disposable, they were always disposable because that it how it was planned. The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 was basically a Jewish revolution with globalist allies and agendas. The Bolshevik Revolution II of 2020 is to complete the work that was not done in 1917, the first Bolshevik Revolution was meant to take all of Europe and hence their colonies and administered territories and thus the world. The word "Bolshevik" means 'majority', this was not had in 1917 but with everybody convincing themselves that the Corona Virus or CoVid-19 or whatever they wish to call this imaginary boogeyman is out to get them... Well they might have that majority now.
Here in Sydney, Australia we have an unofficial martial law. This is supposed to combat a supposed disease that was originally called "Corona Virus" but is now commonly referred to as CoV-19. The measures we have today do not really bear any resemblance to measures used in the days of polio. There were no such "self-containment" measures we see today unless one was quite obviously infected and ill, today we have people hiding under beds in a foetal position sucking their thumbs waiting for the big bad virus to come and get'em. So not only do we have the government imposing martial law via the police outside the home, we have people imposing it on themselves with the virus as the enforcer. Now we have self appointed vigilante enforcers, the sort of people who use their Iphones to take a pic or make a video of those who they think 'violate the rules'. We are now in a situation where the bad old days of the ComBloc societies of Eastern Europe are resurrecting themselves in the West and the entire world.
What people should understand is that the Russian Revolution in 1917 to overthrow the Czar was not just one revolution but in fact two. The first one overthrew the Czar and established a provisional government, but the second one (the Bolshevik Revolution) overthrew the provisional government and brought in a purely Marxist system of government. But the Bolshevik Revolution was not just meant to take the Russian Empire, it was actually meant to take all of Europe and by default the colonies and territories those states ruled or administered. There were temporary 'revolutionary states' set up in Hungary and Bavaria but these were overthrown rather quickly, the now Soviet Union then invaded Poland (engineered by Trotsky) but was defeated. All these attempts to engineer a world government under Trotskyite ideology occurred 100 years ago, and it seems like we are getting a second attempt under the United Nations.
So in Australia under the CoV-19 containment rules be have seen religious services basically outlawed, private enterprise shutdown, freedom of association demolished. We have rules/laws that dictate you cannot be within 1.5 metres of another person, if you violate this you will be either fined $1000 or imprisoned for 6 months. Looking at this situation you would be breaking the law if you slept with your spouse, and that will be the next target; there will be no concept of privacy in a global Bolshevik state. Trotsky and Pol Pot may be dead but there plenty of others who think they are entitled to demand to take their place. The measures and unofficial curfews we have in place at the moment are meant to last 6 months, but the general inference says this will go beyond that. This is not about fighting a disease that cannot be defined, but is about containment of a population in order to establish indoctrination and an authoritarian state. Really the authoritarian state is not a sovereign state per se, but really just an administrated section of a greater world government just like the state or province of a nation.
People have always expected that if a global government were to occur that it would be done under a blatantly Marxist or otherwise leftist agenda. But it has mostly been done under conservative or right wing agendas. Either way the globalist agenda would be completed, under a leftist agenda the United Nations would implement a world government (which it was designed to do under the League of Nations) and this would be done by social government. Under a right wing agenda it would be done by economic governance. Either way these measures are just of personal preference to those implementing it, and really looking between the left and right wings of politics they both have similar aims just a different order of preference. If we were to use the example of a bird as a model we would see the left and right wings, but in order for a body to function it needs a head and a brain that is separate to the wings but yet overrides them. This is where the strategies of both the left and right wings fail. I will give this example in regards to "womens rights", the leftists said that womens rights were about human equality and the right for equal pay. The right wing said it was about economic growth and expenditure - both are valid aims without any other factors involved. However the aim of this was to take women out of the house, and this resulted in women not raising their children but delegating that to others such as maids and servants and the state. The very things that 'financial liberation' was supposed to eliminate from the lives of women. Now by default the state is the family, and factors such as raising children with certain mindsets while preserving their individuality has been left to the state which has delegated these to their employees and their personal tastes and perversions.
Hence this is the reason why atheism, earth worship (the global warming thing wasn't achieving the grand aim hence the "submit to us or the virus gonna kill ya!!!" mental indoctrination pandemic occurring), various sexual dysmorphia fads, compulsory homosexuality and other life altering trends which may have permanent or fatal consequences. Some will excuse these things as the "evolutionary progress of humanity" and that it is a natural occurrence. But the natural occurrence of these things in human beings is very, very small. It does not need to be indoctrinated into people and indeed children, there is no benefit in doing this unless you intend to use these dysfunctional behaviours against them and indeed others. These are the sort of measures you would use in an insurgency or revolution, and much like the provisional revolutionies that other threw the Czar these revolutionaries will find out they are disposable. It isn't a matter of them finding themselves suddenly disposable, they were always disposable because that it how it was planned. The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 was basically a Jewish revolution with globalist allies and agendas. The Bolshevik Revolution II of 2020 is to complete the work that was not done in 1917, the first Bolshevik Revolution was meant to take all of Europe and hence their colonies and administered territories and thus the world. The word "Bolshevik" means 'majority', this was not had in 1917 but with everybody convincing themselves that the Corona Virus or CoVid-19 or whatever they wish to call this imaginary boogeyman is out to get them... Well they might have that majority now.
Sunday 29 March 2020
Welcome to WOKEbodia! Capital is Corona
The "Corona virus" is the greatest con job this world has seen, though to be fair it can't really be an exceptional con job when it is done over idiots and used as a vehicle for global and personal means by the narcissistic and solipsistic. The actual use of the term 'corona virus' is really just a bucket term which can be adjustable at any time according to circumstances. A disease that cannot be defined cannot be cured and a virus that cannot be singularly identified by its symptoms is not a singular virus. Symptoms for this alleged 'virus' include runny noses, coughs, aches and pains, high temperatures and even a lack of symptoms. There are people who appear on TV and the internet proclaiming that they have the corona virus and yet proclaim they have no symptoms. As though this virus does not need physical effects to be considered a detriment to bodily health and functions. And upon examination this corona virus is not really a physical virus but a mental condition.
You might point to people dying all over the world and say this is proof that it is real, if you are using Italy as an example then you have to consider that Italys' population has 50% of its population over the age of 60. Any so called 'new' virus killing them is really just piggybacking on pre existing conditions that they have. Myself, I believe what is causing the deaths is a form of pneumonia. And pneumonia is hardly a 'new' virus, it is treatable and does not require martial law in order to stop it. Looking at the 'measures' to combat this 'corona virus' we see the actions taken are less and increasingly less about health and are in fact centred around power and money. If you put the population aged, let's say 40+ in a position where they will be killed off or at least die off at a greater rate then the remaining population can be coralled and controlled because they no other authority figures to turn to. Consider the HIV/AIDS virus, it in itself does not kill but weakens the immune system to the point where other virus/germ/infection conditions can. In fact most AIDS patients die from pneumonia.
No doubt there have been lead up measures to this all over the world, I live in Sydney, Australia and we have seen what is maybe not in name but certainly in practice martial law. It is the same methods as used by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge when they took over Cambodia and turned it into Kampuchea. In fact the government is seeking to improve on them.
Let's go through them;
1. Shut down religious institutions. As far as I am concerned this is utter cowardice by the churches and indeed other religions if they comply. Sadly the people who might have said "Praise Jesus" in public are being replaced and out numbered by those saying 'f*#k jesus'. Atheism is now the number 1 religion in Australia.
2. Enforce unemployment and dependency on the state.
3. Outlaw gatherings of more than 10 people (though it is said the govt plans to reduce it to 2).
4. Enforce a personal separation space between people. In Australia it is a 1.5 metre separation gap, if you do not comply you will be hit with a $1000 dollar on the spot fine or 6 months imprisonment. These are called "social exclusion" laws.
5. Random demands (and very aggressive) for identification by police officers, this was occurring in the lead up to the current measures. Indeed I was approached 6 times in 2 weeks, twice I was approached within the vicinity of churches. One time I had just left the church and the other while standing out the front of it. One time I was just entering the gates of a train station when a police officer swung his arm at me (I believe he was aiming to grab my coat collar before I went through the gates, he didn't get me and walked off as though nothing had happened).
6. Now in Sydney CBD you have completely automated pedestrian crossings. So there is no need to press a button, you just stand and wait. Why? Because the Corona virus jumps off your hands and onto the traffic light buttons and supposedly vice versa. Sydney is now like those clips you see on North Korea, except Sydney now has less pedestrian traffic and North Korea is now the bastion of liberal democracy in the world.
7. As unemployment increases so has poverty and homelessness due to people being unable to afford rent and mortgage repayments. Rumours of cities being depopulated by the government are increasing, in fact many rumours from the ridiculous, to the plausible, to the true are increasing. There is no government response to these only further legal threats, both real and implied.
8. The only employment growth there seems to be is in building/construction, roadworks, security guards and street cleaning. These are in the hands of private contractors and even then the multiple contractors may be employed for the same contracts. The employees wear either fluoro green or orange uniforms, much like armies and uniforms.
9. It is said that some "homeless" are in fact undercover police officers seeking to gauge social discontent and possibly incite it, they wear cheap clothing but have fabulous complexions and hairstyles. Whether they are police or not I cannot definitely say.
In all honesty Australia should change its name to WOKEbodia or WOKEuchea, money does mean nothing considering all the billions the government is magically pulling out in "fiscal incentives". But the question has to be asked, where is this coming from? In fact let us ask these:
*What is money
*Where does it come from
*How is it valued
And you can put in...
*What percentage of a nations economy is actual cash and not 'keyboard money'?
*How is all this expendeture to be recovered? (I'll give you a clue...inheritance will be abolished, much like religion basically has. Because all glory is to be held by the state. I assume you have heard of Karl Marx? Right?...?
Maybe you have heard of "fractional reserve lending" but do you know what it is?
Have you read the book or investigated "The Creature from Jekyll Island"? Where the likes of the Rockefellers, Rothchilds, Morgans and Stanleys engineered the collapse of the stock market in 1929 which then brought on the great depression. As stock prices collapsed shares were bought up for pennies on the dollar. Is this not happening now under the guise of the "Corona 0virus"? And it is happening under a conservative government with the likes of Scott Morrison (who should be called Pol Scot), Gladys Berejiklian and the United Nations WHO (world health organisation) appointed Brendan Murphy who is the Australian "Chief Medical Officer".
In fact it is fair to say that a new Nazi order has taken over Australia. You have a uniformed workforce in pointless employment, restrictive association laws, a target class (homeless, poor, unemployed), travel restrictions (between states), continuous propaganda on TV, radio, newspapers and internet, increasingly paranoid actions - such as all public toilets in Sydney being locked down. In fact the govt is likely to introduce further lock down laws and curfews, and has sort to impose lock down laws regarding exclusive suburbs to keep non residents out. On top of that the health department and police department seem to have a free hand in shutting businesses and streets down. Now they are seeking to shutdown soup kitchens that cater to the poor that they themselves have created. Churches, libraries (actually the libraries were targetted because of their free and anonymous internet connections) and schools shut down without a peep, welcome to the Republic of WOKE (and here I wonder about the health of the royals, especially the Queen. If she were to die and Charles was really sick then who would be the safeguard of the various constitutions?). This is the disease of wetiko.
You might point to people dying all over the world and say this is proof that it is real, if you are using Italy as an example then you have to consider that Italys' population has 50% of its population over the age of 60. Any so called 'new' virus killing them is really just piggybacking on pre existing conditions that they have. Myself, I believe what is causing the deaths is a form of pneumonia. And pneumonia is hardly a 'new' virus, it is treatable and does not require martial law in order to stop it. Looking at the 'measures' to combat this 'corona virus' we see the actions taken are less and increasingly less about health and are in fact centred around power and money. If you put the population aged, let's say 40+ in a position where they will be killed off or at least die off at a greater rate then the remaining population can be coralled and controlled because they no other authority figures to turn to. Consider the HIV/AIDS virus, it in itself does not kill but weakens the immune system to the point where other virus/germ/infection conditions can. In fact most AIDS patients die from pneumonia.
No doubt there have been lead up measures to this all over the world, I live in Sydney, Australia and we have seen what is maybe not in name but certainly in practice martial law. It is the same methods as used by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge when they took over Cambodia and turned it into Kampuchea. In fact the government is seeking to improve on them.
Let's go through them;
1. Shut down religious institutions. As far as I am concerned this is utter cowardice by the churches and indeed other religions if they comply. Sadly the people who might have said "Praise Jesus" in public are being replaced and out numbered by those saying 'f*#k jesus'. Atheism is now the number 1 religion in Australia.
2. Enforce unemployment and dependency on the state.
3. Outlaw gatherings of more than 10 people (though it is said the govt plans to reduce it to 2).
4. Enforce a personal separation space between people. In Australia it is a 1.5 metre separation gap, if you do not comply you will be hit with a $1000 dollar on the spot fine or 6 months imprisonment. These are called "social exclusion" laws.
5. Random demands (and very aggressive) for identification by police officers, this was occurring in the lead up to the current measures. Indeed I was approached 6 times in 2 weeks, twice I was approached within the vicinity of churches. One time I had just left the church and the other while standing out the front of it. One time I was just entering the gates of a train station when a police officer swung his arm at me (I believe he was aiming to grab my coat collar before I went through the gates, he didn't get me and walked off as though nothing had happened).
6. Now in Sydney CBD you have completely automated pedestrian crossings. So there is no need to press a button, you just stand and wait. Why? Because the Corona virus jumps off your hands and onto the traffic light buttons and supposedly vice versa. Sydney is now like those clips you see on North Korea, except Sydney now has less pedestrian traffic and North Korea is now the bastion of liberal democracy in the world.
7. As unemployment increases so has poverty and homelessness due to people being unable to afford rent and mortgage repayments. Rumours of cities being depopulated by the government are increasing, in fact many rumours from the ridiculous, to the plausible, to the true are increasing. There is no government response to these only further legal threats, both real and implied.
8. The only employment growth there seems to be is in building/construction, roadworks, security guards and street cleaning. These are in the hands of private contractors and even then the multiple contractors may be employed for the same contracts. The employees wear either fluoro green or orange uniforms, much like armies and uniforms.
9. It is said that some "homeless" are in fact undercover police officers seeking to gauge social discontent and possibly incite it, they wear cheap clothing but have fabulous complexions and hairstyles. Whether they are police or not I cannot definitely say.
In all honesty Australia should change its name to WOKEbodia or WOKEuchea, money does mean nothing considering all the billions the government is magically pulling out in "fiscal incentives". But the question has to be asked, where is this coming from? In fact let us ask these:
*What is money
*Where does it come from
*How is it valued
And you can put in...
*What percentage of a nations economy is actual cash and not 'keyboard money'?
*How is all this expendeture to be recovered? (I'll give you a clue...inheritance will be abolished, much like religion basically has. Because all glory is to be held by the state. I assume you have heard of Karl Marx? Right?...?
Maybe you have heard of "fractional reserve lending" but do you know what it is?
Have you read the book or investigated "The Creature from Jekyll Island"? Where the likes of the Rockefellers, Rothchilds, Morgans and Stanleys engineered the collapse of the stock market in 1929 which then brought on the great depression. As stock prices collapsed shares were bought up for pennies on the dollar. Is this not happening now under the guise of the "Corona 0virus"? And it is happening under a conservative government with the likes of Scott Morrison (who should be called Pol Scot), Gladys Berejiklian and the United Nations WHO (world health organisation) appointed Brendan Murphy who is the Australian "Chief Medical Officer".
In fact it is fair to say that a new Nazi order has taken over Australia. You have a uniformed workforce in pointless employment, restrictive association laws, a target class (homeless, poor, unemployed), travel restrictions (between states), continuous propaganda on TV, radio, newspapers and internet, increasingly paranoid actions - such as all public toilets in Sydney being locked down. In fact the govt is likely to introduce further lock down laws and curfews, and has sort to impose lock down laws regarding exclusive suburbs to keep non residents out. On top of that the health department and police department seem to have a free hand in shutting businesses and streets down. Now they are seeking to shutdown soup kitchens that cater to the poor that they themselves have created. Churches, libraries (actually the libraries were targetted because of their free and anonymous internet connections) and schools shut down without a peep, welcome to the Republic of WOKE (and here I wonder about the health of the royals, especially the Queen. If she were to die and Charles was really sick then who would be the safeguard of the various constitutions?). This is the disease of wetiko.
Friday 20 December 2019
Chapter 6 - part 2
Continuing Chapter 6
Look at things as they are now (particularly in the West), everyone feels they are 'entitled'. They may like to think they are entitled, but these people do not actually think as to why they are entitled. The fact is they 'feel' they are entitled to 'feel' that way, no logic or sense is offered by these people because they are basing their feelings on someone elses thinking as well as their own emotions resulting from that thinking.
And if they feel that they have been wronged then it is both entitlement and victimhood that is what they hold as facts instead of just indoctrinated correct 'feelings' ( but really what is the difference?). As far as they are concerned they can never be wrong because their feelings are 'correct' and can never be wrong. Again in the words of Hasan of Alamut: "Nothing is true; all is permitted". Indeed nothing is true and all is permitted because we live in a world that is without form and void. You only have to turn on a TV or a radio or just view the internet and see blatant lies. It is no longer a matter of some person or organisation putting their slant on a news story or even viewing a news story of any actual importance. We are being lied to openly in the same manner of wartime propaganda; we are being indoctrinated by vested interests such as political movements as well as commercial organisations. This occurs because people allow them to do so out of the sake of convenience. But really it is out of a sense of compliance, correctness and not wanting to cause 'trouble'.
One only has to look at the "technological achievements" of today particularly in Western societies that are European or European based (particularly Western European, Scandinavian and even Asian), and which are spreading around the world in the name of "progress". We see "interactive design" in which people design ways for man to become interactive with machines. Then we have the issue of implants where people inject themselves with RFID chips at "implant parties", again for convenience so no thinking or memory is required. Further more if people decide to get chip implants (going with Revelations) they may have a 5g chip placed in their forehead. The radiation from a 5g chip as found in cell phones can penetrate approximately 8mm, if placed in the forehead where the "3rd eye" is said to be located this would have an impact on ones' personality; if not change or erase that personality. But for those who might have any desire to think we see "Artificial Intelligence" that can override any natural thoughts they have, whether by group approval, peer pressure, doubt or indeed force.
You might be thinking that you will never encounter this or the effects of this in your lifetime, well we can see pornographic movies on the internet where binaural beats are used in the background 'music'. This is particularly used in "sissy" pornography (where men dress up in womens' clothing to engage in homosexual acts) and "BBC" pornography (where white women engage in sex with black men while the husband watches the sex as a 'cuckold').
So we have hypnotism and binaural meditation trance music being used to make people turn against their nature and adopt a lifestyle to be something they are not, and probably never were (TV advertising makes use of the same method). The participants and the viewers of this pornography are an overwhelming majority white and of Western European ancestry, it is no coincidence that these people and societies are increasingly atheist and "politically correct".
Is atheism taking over Western Europe? Well if one were to take Western media at face value, then the answer would be yes. Is it actually true? At the moment it has slightly slid on to the yes part, but it is increasing due to groupthink and this will increase due to other factors such as the dumbing down of the population. Let us look at the subject of 'memes'. These are simply pictures which are deemed to be funny or 'viral' with a 'one liner' quote added on to it. And you will find 'millennials' or 'Gen Z' or just anyone under the age of... say... 22 valuing these 'memes' as being of the same value as "War and Peace" by Tolstoy, in fact there is strategy called 'memetic warfare' regarding propaganda production. All these things that are happening are deemed "progress", certainly in the West.
Now we see in the West the 'transgender' fashion which has no age limit, everyone from 4 to 14 to 40 to 400 is susceptible to this 'infection', this is a prime example of a groupthink or wetiko disease in that it is a psychological illness spread by psychological means. There is no physical disease or DNA fault that would make you inclined to change your gender, whether it be by self 'identity' or else by injecting hormones and receiving surgery. You simply cannot change your 'gender' by such means, if you are a male who has had surgery, steroids and hypnotherapy you will never be a biological female. At best you might be able to pass as one on occasion, but if you were ever cloned the result would be a biological male.
None of these things I written about so far in this chapter can ever be considered 'normal', and everyone must not ever let this be accepted as 'progress' when it is in fact the opposite. These things go against human nature and is another example of the reversal of order. Is it worthwhile for the djinn to launch a 'counter jihad' against the West? The way things are at the moment, with people willingly participating in their own debasement and destruction, the answer has to be no. They do not have to, their plan is working fine.
Have you heard of the "Creature of Jekyll Island" or how genuine ancient occult knowledge has been replaced by sabotaged knowledge or else by fluff? Do you notice state sanctioned alcohol and pharmaceutical abuse? Are you worried by RFID chip implants, or how euthanasia is going to be a viable, accepted and expected way to end your life? Does it concern you how the Lord Jesus Christ has been cheapened to "just Jesus" and Christianity has been redefined to chiliasm? What about the Frankfurt School? All these things have been set in motion since the 1920s and even before that, modern history hasn't really explained anything to anyone. Plus the low attention spans of everyone means that history is really a variable based on feelings which have been decided by someone else. Maybe people have heard about these things but they have just conveniently "forgotten" them. Hopefully you are different.
So looking at the world today do you see how our societies were molded by past history and especially the events and actions of the 1920s and 30s? We had those who were basically insane introduce the world to the likes of psychiatry and psychology, which has continued on. It is the gift that never stops giving and it gave us the likes of Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey who became gifts who never stop giving. And we can see this in the legitimisation and acceptance of the various sexual perversions that are readily seen in pornography. It is the various forms of Marxism that have manifested and been implemented which have resulted in the likes of hippies and the green political movement and their splinter movements. They may be seen as opposing each other at times, but the best way to deal with opposition to you is to run the opposition yourself.
If you have been watching the news services during the past week or two (the date today is 19/12/2019) you might have seen how the state of New South Wales, Australia has been ravished by bushfires. The fires have been largely the result of very hot weather, but they have also been the result of poor forest management (because of green 'environmentalism'). The first round of bushfires occurred in the Ballina and Byron Bay areas which are full of hippie dropouts, immediately the greens and hippies were screaming "global warming!!!" and demanding various government funds (another example of the neverending gift).
Police investigations of the fires found they were caused by arson. Yes the hippies who have their worthless existance based around saving endangered plants and animals had no problem with setting them on fire for a government grant. They happily called up news programs to show burned koalas and wombats while demanding money. A case of the arsonist becoming the rescuer (actually the firemen who fought the bushfires are heroes as far as I am concerned and must never be lumped with these criminals, the arsonists should be tried as terrorists but unfortunately this will never happen). Needless to say we are up against truly bad, wicked and evil people.
I wrote the last paragraph less than 24 hours ago, the date today is 20/12/2019. Today two firefighters were killed in the bushfires ravaging New South Wales, but in its capital Sydney in the CBD we had a demonstration by the "Extinction Rebellion". They were protesting about coal and climate change, yes they know everything while sipping soy lattes in their inner city hi-rise apartments and their upper north shore and eastern suburbs mansions. They are nothing more than rich white kids in university and jews. These are the people who are pushing vegan diets for everyone, and they are the ones calling everyone a Nazi. Green and vegan with socialist leanings, you know who else that describes? Adolf Hitler, in fact the symbol they use (a runic type sigil which looks like the letter 'X' or two triangles on top of each other joined at their top point in a circle) is actually from a white power group in America known as "Iron Rain".
Look at things as they are now (particularly in the West), everyone feels they are 'entitled'. They may like to think they are entitled, but these people do not actually think as to why they are entitled. The fact is they 'feel' they are entitled to 'feel' that way, no logic or sense is offered by these people because they are basing their feelings on someone elses thinking as well as their own emotions resulting from that thinking.
And if they feel that they have been wronged then it is both entitlement and victimhood that is what they hold as facts instead of just indoctrinated correct 'feelings' ( but really what is the difference?). As far as they are concerned they can never be wrong because their feelings are 'correct' and can never be wrong. Again in the words of Hasan of Alamut: "Nothing is true; all is permitted". Indeed nothing is true and all is permitted because we live in a world that is without form and void. You only have to turn on a TV or a radio or just view the internet and see blatant lies. It is no longer a matter of some person or organisation putting their slant on a news story or even viewing a news story of any actual importance. We are being lied to openly in the same manner of wartime propaganda; we are being indoctrinated by vested interests such as political movements as well as commercial organisations. This occurs because people allow them to do so out of the sake of convenience. But really it is out of a sense of compliance, correctness and not wanting to cause 'trouble'.
One only has to look at the "technological achievements" of today particularly in Western societies that are European or European based (particularly Western European, Scandinavian and even Asian), and which are spreading around the world in the name of "progress". We see "interactive design" in which people design ways for man to become interactive with machines. Then we have the issue of implants where people inject themselves with RFID chips at "implant parties", again for convenience so no thinking or memory is required. Further more if people decide to get chip implants (going with Revelations) they may have a 5g chip placed in their forehead. The radiation from a 5g chip as found in cell phones can penetrate approximately 8mm, if placed in the forehead where the "3rd eye" is said to be located this would have an impact on ones' personality; if not change or erase that personality. But for those who might have any desire to think we see "Artificial Intelligence" that can override any natural thoughts they have, whether by group approval, peer pressure, doubt or indeed force.
You might be thinking that you will never encounter this or the effects of this in your lifetime, well we can see pornographic movies on the internet where binaural beats are used in the background 'music'. This is particularly used in "sissy" pornography (where men dress up in womens' clothing to engage in homosexual acts) and "BBC" pornography (where white women engage in sex with black men while the husband watches the sex as a 'cuckold').
So we have hypnotism and binaural meditation trance music being used to make people turn against their nature and adopt a lifestyle to be something they are not, and probably never were (TV advertising makes use of the same method). The participants and the viewers of this pornography are an overwhelming majority white and of Western European ancestry, it is no coincidence that these people and societies are increasingly atheist and "politically correct".
Is atheism taking over Western Europe? Well if one were to take Western media at face value, then the answer would be yes. Is it actually true? At the moment it has slightly slid on to the yes part, but it is increasing due to groupthink and this will increase due to other factors such as the dumbing down of the population. Let us look at the subject of 'memes'. These are simply pictures which are deemed to be funny or 'viral' with a 'one liner' quote added on to it. And you will find 'millennials' or 'Gen Z' or just anyone under the age of... say... 22 valuing these 'memes' as being of the same value as "War and Peace" by Tolstoy, in fact there is strategy called 'memetic warfare' regarding propaganda production. All these things that are happening are deemed "progress", certainly in the West.
Now we see in the West the 'transgender' fashion which has no age limit, everyone from 4 to 14 to 40 to 400 is susceptible to this 'infection', this is a prime example of a groupthink or wetiko disease in that it is a psychological illness spread by psychological means. There is no physical disease or DNA fault that would make you inclined to change your gender, whether it be by self 'identity' or else by injecting hormones and receiving surgery. You simply cannot change your 'gender' by such means, if you are a male who has had surgery, steroids and hypnotherapy you will never be a biological female. At best you might be able to pass as one on occasion, but if you were ever cloned the result would be a biological male.
None of these things I written about so far in this chapter can ever be considered 'normal', and everyone must not ever let this be accepted as 'progress' when it is in fact the opposite. These things go against human nature and is another example of the reversal of order. Is it worthwhile for the djinn to launch a 'counter jihad' against the West? The way things are at the moment, with people willingly participating in their own debasement and destruction, the answer has to be no. They do not have to, their plan is working fine.
Have you heard of the "Creature of Jekyll Island" or how genuine ancient occult knowledge has been replaced by sabotaged knowledge or else by fluff? Do you notice state sanctioned alcohol and pharmaceutical abuse? Are you worried by RFID chip implants, or how euthanasia is going to be a viable, accepted and expected way to end your life? Does it concern you how the Lord Jesus Christ has been cheapened to "just Jesus" and Christianity has been redefined to chiliasm? What about the Frankfurt School? All these things have been set in motion since the 1920s and even before that, modern history hasn't really explained anything to anyone. Plus the low attention spans of everyone means that history is really a variable based on feelings which have been decided by someone else. Maybe people have heard about these things but they have just conveniently "forgotten" them. Hopefully you are different.
So looking at the world today do you see how our societies were molded by past history and especially the events and actions of the 1920s and 30s? We had those who were basically insane introduce the world to the likes of psychiatry and psychology, which has continued on. It is the gift that never stops giving and it gave us the likes of Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey who became gifts who never stop giving. And we can see this in the legitimisation and acceptance of the various sexual perversions that are readily seen in pornography. It is the various forms of Marxism that have manifested and been implemented which have resulted in the likes of hippies and the green political movement and their splinter movements. They may be seen as opposing each other at times, but the best way to deal with opposition to you is to run the opposition yourself.
If you have been watching the news services during the past week or two (the date today is 19/12/2019) you might have seen how the state of New South Wales, Australia has been ravished by bushfires. The fires have been largely the result of very hot weather, but they have also been the result of poor forest management (because of green 'environmentalism'). The first round of bushfires occurred in the Ballina and Byron Bay areas which are full of hippie dropouts, immediately the greens and hippies were screaming "global warming!!!" and demanding various government funds (another example of the neverending gift).
Police investigations of the fires found they were caused by arson. Yes the hippies who have their worthless existance based around saving endangered plants and animals had no problem with setting them on fire for a government grant. They happily called up news programs to show burned koalas and wombats while demanding money. A case of the arsonist becoming the rescuer (actually the firemen who fought the bushfires are heroes as far as I am concerned and must never be lumped with these criminals, the arsonists should be tried as terrorists but unfortunately this will never happen). Needless to say we are up against truly bad, wicked and evil people.
I wrote the last paragraph less than 24 hours ago, the date today is 20/12/2019. Today two firefighters were killed in the bushfires ravaging New South Wales, but in its capital Sydney in the CBD we had a demonstration by the "Extinction Rebellion". They were protesting about coal and climate change, yes they know everything while sipping soy lattes in their inner city hi-rise apartments and their upper north shore and eastern suburbs mansions. They are nothing more than rich white kids in university and jews. These are the people who are pushing vegan diets for everyone, and they are the ones calling everyone a Nazi. Green and vegan with socialist leanings, you know who else that describes? Adolf Hitler, in fact the symbol they use (a runic type sigil which looks like the letter 'X' or two triangles on top of each other joined at their top point in a circle) is actually from a white power group in America known as "Iron Rain".
Chapter 6 - part 1
This is from a book I have written called "Taking, holding and keeping. Possession and Exorcism today."
Chapter 6
Intermission
I just decided to place an intermission here to do a recap of what I have written so far. So far I've been centred on the secular and commercial cultural aspects of the problem we are facing right now, as it would be a mistake to simply dismiss it as being an irrelevant factor. It is a relevant factor, all factors are relevant because one complements or at the least supplements the others. An army may be fighting an enemy on a single front but to be successful it has to break up its singular front into multiple fronts which each one using a different strategy. It does this knowing if one mini front is successful in breaking the enemys' line. Then the other fronts will be able to supply soldiers to continually invade the breach or else the breach will weaken various sections of the enemys' front line by making them transport their soldiers to that breach without a coherent strategy. Transportation of soldiers front various parts of a line will weaken the sections where they were stationed and quite possibly lead to another breach.
So using Christianity as an example, we have the various mini fronts in the likes of the various denominations of Christianity. Some will back up, complement and supplement the others, but some will not. And some will support a non Christian or even atheist religion in a conflict against a denomination who they see as a rival in the Christian realm. Yes we are talking about minuscule, near extinct denominations and a handful of people who would rather hand over the keys of their church to non Christians and atheists than to a Christian denomination who they see as their number one rival. Even worse they would rather burn their church than see it held by rival theology Christians. If you want to ask where and when this has happened, one only has to look at history particulary in the middle ages.
If you want something more recent then you only have to look at Northern Ireland/Ulster, it didn't start off as a sectarian war per se but was caught up in one. It amazes me that people do not or simply refuse to recognise the PIRA (Provisional Irish Republican Army) is a decidedly atheist and somewhat Marxist organisation. The PIRA has a problem with those who identify as British in Northern Ireland but has no problem with professional refugees or a gay ethnic Indian ruling and running the southern portion of Ireland (Republic of Ireland). So the propaganda of PIRA saying it wanted a celtic and catholic Ireland was just lies and garbage and yet the Christian world (if not the entire world) fell for it. These sort of situations simply have to stop regardless of denomination, Christianity is about your faith in God and not about your "identity". It is as simple as that. Islam faces the same problems as well, most notably the sunni/shiite divide and indeed such divisions will be found in all religions. But truthfully there are only two sides, those who are faithful to God and those who serve Satan. Unless we complement, supplement, back up and support each other then it will be our lines that are breached, And it will be our front that collapses and it will be our children and our future that are taken away in chains. The fact is we are losing the war and if we utterly lose the war, then that's it! The game is over! The Tree of Death will be completed and cut off from God, the separation will be eternal. This is hell from which you will not escape.
Now you know why this war has to utterly be won, all tactics are fair and if they work you win. Today we blatantly see things that were predicted over two millennia ago, in fact when looking through the ages it is probably longer. We are now seeing ancient plans (well at least ancient to us) come into fruition, what people have to realise is that there is no concept of mechanical time by the standards of the djinn because they are not physical beings per se. Yes they can assume a physical appearance when the time is appropriate by the planets but they are not physical mortal beings. A human being cannot kill a djinni by a purely physical based method as can be done to other human beings. To them one day, one week or one year is all the same, it is by the planets on a physical level and human time (as measured with clocks and calendars) on a symbolic level they can measure time. Yes they can measure an approximation of time by our life and death but this is an approximation and not guaranteed. Because what we know as time is measured symbolically, it is possible for a government to declare that sunrise occurs at 3pm and indeed enforce this by physical means (regardless of what you think).
We exist in a world that does not seem to have absolutes, certainly in the West where everything is negotiable and therefore a variable.Whether by theory or actual practice it seems that factors in any situation we may face or encounter cannot be absolute but rather variables. Concepts of right and wrong are just that....concepts and will remain that because of people as a whole engaging in moral relativism.
What we are seeing globally today is the result of the reversal of order; and this is what the djinn need in order to take this earth in this world (Malkuth in Assiah) and it is also about taking control of everything else in this world. It is indeed the ability to decide and declare that day is night, make the days of week function in the reverse. And to impose the order and method for these things to operate and be accepted. They could very well each claim and declare (as a collective in relation to human beings) themselves 'god of this world'. Ha-Shaitan is referred to as 'Prince of this world', if these things can be done by the one who holds the title of Satan. Why would it not be acceptable or proper that they will promote themselves above their current position? After all, if you went to war against God and took this earth in this world (and by default all known physical existence) would you not feel 'entitled' to do so?
Chapter 6
Intermission
I just decided to place an intermission here to do a recap of what I have written so far. So far I've been centred on the secular and commercial cultural aspects of the problem we are facing right now, as it would be a mistake to simply dismiss it as being an irrelevant factor. It is a relevant factor, all factors are relevant because one complements or at the least supplements the others. An army may be fighting an enemy on a single front but to be successful it has to break up its singular front into multiple fronts which each one using a different strategy. It does this knowing if one mini front is successful in breaking the enemys' line. Then the other fronts will be able to supply soldiers to continually invade the breach or else the breach will weaken various sections of the enemys' front line by making them transport their soldiers to that breach without a coherent strategy. Transportation of soldiers front various parts of a line will weaken the sections where they were stationed and quite possibly lead to another breach.
So using Christianity as an example, we have the various mini fronts in the likes of the various denominations of Christianity. Some will back up, complement and supplement the others, but some will not. And some will support a non Christian or even atheist religion in a conflict against a denomination who they see as a rival in the Christian realm. Yes we are talking about minuscule, near extinct denominations and a handful of people who would rather hand over the keys of their church to non Christians and atheists than to a Christian denomination who they see as their number one rival. Even worse they would rather burn their church than see it held by rival theology Christians. If you want to ask where and when this has happened, one only has to look at history particulary in the middle ages.
If you want something more recent then you only have to look at Northern Ireland/Ulster, it didn't start off as a sectarian war per se but was caught up in one. It amazes me that people do not or simply refuse to recognise the PIRA (Provisional Irish Republican Army) is a decidedly atheist and somewhat Marxist organisation. The PIRA has a problem with those who identify as British in Northern Ireland but has no problem with professional refugees or a gay ethnic Indian ruling and running the southern portion of Ireland (Republic of Ireland). So the propaganda of PIRA saying it wanted a celtic and catholic Ireland was just lies and garbage and yet the Christian world (if not the entire world) fell for it. These sort of situations simply have to stop regardless of denomination, Christianity is about your faith in God and not about your "identity". It is as simple as that. Islam faces the same problems as well, most notably the sunni/shiite divide and indeed such divisions will be found in all religions. But truthfully there are only two sides, those who are faithful to God and those who serve Satan. Unless we complement, supplement, back up and support each other then it will be our lines that are breached, And it will be our front that collapses and it will be our children and our future that are taken away in chains. The fact is we are losing the war and if we utterly lose the war, then that's it! The game is over! The Tree of Death will be completed and cut off from God, the separation will be eternal. This is hell from which you will not escape.
Now you know why this war has to utterly be won, all tactics are fair and if they work you win. Today we blatantly see things that were predicted over two millennia ago, in fact when looking through the ages it is probably longer. We are now seeing ancient plans (well at least ancient to us) come into fruition, what people have to realise is that there is no concept of mechanical time by the standards of the djinn because they are not physical beings per se. Yes they can assume a physical appearance when the time is appropriate by the planets but they are not physical mortal beings. A human being cannot kill a djinni by a purely physical based method as can be done to other human beings. To them one day, one week or one year is all the same, it is by the planets on a physical level and human time (as measured with clocks and calendars) on a symbolic level they can measure time. Yes they can measure an approximation of time by our life and death but this is an approximation and not guaranteed. Because what we know as time is measured symbolically, it is possible for a government to declare that sunrise occurs at 3pm and indeed enforce this by physical means (regardless of what you think).
We exist in a world that does not seem to have absolutes, certainly in the West where everything is negotiable and therefore a variable.Whether by theory or actual practice it seems that factors in any situation we may face or encounter cannot be absolute but rather variables. Concepts of right and wrong are just that....concepts and will remain that because of people as a whole engaging in moral relativism.
What we are seeing globally today is the result of the reversal of order; and this is what the djinn need in order to take this earth in this world (Malkuth in Assiah) and it is also about taking control of everything else in this world. It is indeed the ability to decide and declare that day is night, make the days of week function in the reverse. And to impose the order and method for these things to operate and be accepted. They could very well each claim and declare (as a collective in relation to human beings) themselves 'god of this world'. Ha-Shaitan is referred to as 'Prince of this world', if these things can be done by the one who holds the title of Satan. Why would it not be acceptable or proper that they will promote themselves above their current position? After all, if you went to war against God and took this earth in this world (and by default all known physical existence) would you not feel 'entitled' to do so?
Thursday 21 November 2019
Wednesday 13 November 2019
"THE PANENDEISM TREATISE"
Full text of "THE PANENDEISM TREATISE"
See other formats
THE PANENDEISM TREATISE
PANENDEISM ORGANIZATION PRESS
By Benjamin Sullivan & James McDermott
© 2017. Panendeism Organization certificate of publication N°- OW120875
PANENDEISM ORGANIZATION PRESS
Panendeism Organization is dedicated to exploring the vast potential of Panendeism, a world view that is both millennia old and has more recently been hailed by many of the greatest physicists as a potentially true representation of reality. From its shocking implications in science, to its affirmation of human dignity, Panendeism is a promising new focus within the parent philosophy of Deism.
Our focus is to analyze the wealth of scientific data that has been accrued over the past century and promote new and revolutionary ways of investigating and expanding potentially groundbreaking fields of research.
Above all else, we are committed to the cultivation and recognition of all humanity as one extended family in which each member is worthy of value, respect, and friendship. We affirm that all life is also worthy of our care,
respect, and admiration.
For more information about our organization and mission, please visit us on the web at www.panendeism.org .
© 2017. Panendeism Organization certificate of publication N°- OW120875 [1]
ETYMOLOGY
Panendeism (or pan-en-deism), pronounced paen'en'dei Iz'sm, is derived from the Greek pan (nav), meaning all, en (sv) meaning in, and deus (Asug), meaning god. The earliest known use of the term was in 1995 by Jim Garvin 1 , a Korean War veteran and Catholic turned Trappist monk. Garvin described his concept of deity as being similar to the "all-pervading Great Spirit" of the Native Americans, and called it "Pan-en-deism." The term “Panendeism” was officially proposed more recently by Larry Copling in 2001.
OVERVIEW
Panendeism is an ontological position that explores the interrelationship between God (The Cosmic Mind) and the known attributes of the universe. Combining aspects of Panentheism and Deism, Panendeism proposes an idea of God that both embodies the universe and is transcendent of its observable physical properties. Although examples of Panendeistic thought can be found as early as the 1st millennium BCE, it was not until nearly 3,000 years had passed, at the dawn of the 20th century, that these ideas began to gain traction as a prevailing scientific model of reality.
The first well recorded teachings that evoke the God hypothesis of Panendeism were introduced by Adi Shankara, who unified the Eastern Philosophy of Advaita Vedanta in Hinduism in the 8th century BCE. Later, in the 4th century BCE, Plato’s philosophy of “The One” or “The Good” introduced these concepts to the West and were subsequently expounded upon by Plotinus as in the 2nd century BCE. Much later, in the 17th century CE, Baruch Spinoza would define God as the only thing that exists in his “Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being,” a work that later earned him the affection of Albert Einstein, who described his own belief as being similar to Spinoza’s.
After Spinoza, German idealism continued to pave the way for Panendeism, with authors such as Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel all leaving behind fantastic works that are certainly worth reading. Other wonderful examples include the Transcendentalism of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman, as well as the 20th century Process Theism of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne.
With the dawn of the 20th century, science had at last begun to advance to a point at which the potential in several millennia of Panendeistic philosophy began to appear consistent with the objective picture of reality. Einstein’s earth shattering publication of special relativity in 1905 opened the flood gates to an entirely new scientific conception for the very basis of what we perceive as reality. The universe could no longer be seen solely in terms of Newton’s static, unchanging celestial spheres. Our understanding of the entire universe was very suddenly 'transformed' to something infinitely more perplexing, but also remarkably more insightful and potentially closer to the true reality of the Universe. Through one equation, Einstein conceived of a dynamic Universe that behaved like a sea of energy arrayed with an expanding fabric of space-time, and comprised of dynamic and interactive energy modules that could take on the form of matter, light/ radiation, or other forms, unknown: E=MC 2 .
Einstein, who would be echoed by other physicists contemplating the scientific
implications of this quantum sea in which we are immersed and of which we are composed, later mused:
“[Man] experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. The striving to free oneself from this delusion is the one issue of true religion. Not to nourish it but to try to overcome it is the way to reach the attainable measure of peace of mind. "[2]
In 1905, Max Planck, the father of quantum theory, was among the first to immediately recognize the significance of Einstein’s (later famous) publication. Indeed, much of the initial notoriety Einstein’s theory received was largely thanks to Planck’s efforts to introduce it within the scientific community. After receiving the Nobel Prize in 1918 and spending a lifetime in Quantum Physics, Planck, as its father, unabashedly said this regarding the nature of reality:
As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter. [3]
As science continued to unravel the mysteries of reality, new proponents of Panendeistic thought emerged. Niels Bohr, who in 1922, received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to atomic structure and quantum theory clearly defined Panendeism in these terms:
“We can admittedly find nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness. Yet all of us know that there is such a thing as consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or, more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics and chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, we must also consider laws of quite a different kind. ”
Erwin Schrodinger, who in 1933, received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on quantum theory, said this:
"It is not possible that this unity of knowledge, feeling and choice which you call your own should have sprung into being from nothingness at a given moment not so long ago; rather this knowledge, feeling, and choice are essentially eternal and unchangeable and numerically one in all men, nay in all sensitive beings. But not in this sense — that you are a part, a piece, of an eternal, infinite being, an aspect or modification of it . . For we should then have the same baffling question:Which part, which aspect are you? What, objectively, differentiates it from the others? No, but, inconceivable as it seems to ordinary reason, you — and all other conscious beings as such — are all in all. Hence, this life of yours. . . is, in a certain sense, the whole. . . This, as we know, is what the Brahmins express in that sacred, mystic formula... 'Tat tvam asi' — this is you. Or, again, in such words as 'I am in the east and in the west, I am below and above, I am this whole world. "
Werner Heisenberg, one of the fathers of quantum mechanics, had this to say
regarding the ultimate nature of reality:
"...The same organizing forces that have shaped nature in all her forms are also responsible for the structure of our minds... Of course, we all know that our own reality depends on the structure of our consciousness; we can objectify no more than a small part of our world. But even when we try to probe into the subjective realm, we cannot ignore the central order. ..In the final analysis, the central order, or the 'one' as it used to be called and with which we commune in the language of religion, must win out. "
David Bohm, a protege of Einstein who's often referred to as one of the most
significant theoretical physicists of the 20th century, said this:
“The field of the finite is all that we can see, hear, touch, remember, and describe. This field is basically that which is manifest, or tangible. The essential quality of the infinite, by contrast, is its subtlety, its intangibility. This quality is conveyed in the word spirit, whose root meaning is "wind, or breath. "
This suggests an invisible but pervasive energy, to which the manifest world of the finite responds. This energy, or spirit, infuses all living beings, and without it any organism must fall apart into its constituent elements. That which is truly alive in the living being is this energy of spirit, and this is never born and never dies.
And these great minds only begin to scrape the surface of names that have both revolutionized science and seen clear implications for a Panendeistic sort of world view. Among many others, Nikola Tesla, Gregory Bateson, Sir Arthur Eddington, Robert Jahn, Sir James Jeans, Henry Margenau, Carl Friedrich Von Weizsacker, Freeman Dyson, and contemporary scientists like Paul Davies and Robert Lanza, have all advocated or affirmed the ontological ideas put forth by Panendeism as both plausible and in perfect harmony with the reality that science reveals to us. Indeed, it is not unfair to say that without the ability of these brilliant minds who forsook their own human perception of reality for the scientific evidence they were presented with, we might never have arrived at the proven theories of quantum physics or relativity, both of which have radically changed the course of human progress over the past century.
Like its parent philosophy Deism, Panendeism is closely related to naturalism and advocates that arguments for the existence of Deity must be maintained through science, reason, and observation of the natural world. Also, as in Deism, Panendeism is reasonably skeptical of - or dismisses religious figureheads, prophets, and claims of divine revelation. Panendeism is more likely to readily avoid the errors of dogma, corruption, oppression, and manipulation often manifest in organized religions, simply because it is self-governed and has no founders, fathers, or leaders. Each Deist or Panendeist, past, present and future, must justify their conclusions and hypotheses by means of the 'God-given' instruments of reason and science. Purely speculative notions are encouraged, where they are presented as speculation.
Likewise, Panendeism is highly skeptical of claims relating to the suspension of natural law through mediums such as supernatural forces or beings. Panendeism does not seek to define the attributes of Deity beyond affirming that the necessary Uncaused First Cause exists and is itself the underlying substance and cause of reality. By necessity of the proposed interconnection between God and reality, Panendeism proposes and presumes that the entire universe and everything within it is both sacred and meaningful. In this way, scientific knowledge, nature, and being are all modes of spiritual connection to Deity. Each sapient being, and to some degree, every living thing, is and must be part and parcel of God.
THE 5 TENETS OF PANENDEISM
Like our progressive science, both Deism and Panendeism represent broad world views that are constantly evolving as knowledge and science progress. However, Panendeism is governed by 5 unchanging principles:
1. We affirm as a defining thesis, that the natural terrestrial world, and the greater Universe we observe are, by very definition, “real,” and acknowledge that these may well be the only semblance of God we shall ever witness with our human eyes. We assert that we, as sapient beings, are an integral part of the whole, and that human observational perception, both material and spiritual, is worthy of our interest, pursuit, and trust.
2. We affirm the primacy of human reason and science as the final arbiters of
truth and error regarding our understanding of the universe, but acknowledge
that human beings embody, by design, integrated intuition and expression that transcend the bounds of science. We propound that qualities such as consciousness, compassion, passion, introspection, interconnection, love, friendship, kindness, hope, goodwill, charity, sincerity, inspiration, music, art, and spirituality, are among these inherent and inspired natural qualities.
3. We affirm that we are, even in our own cognitive abilities, finite. We
acknowledge that human reasoning is limited, our senses and perception are
imperfect, and that we are free to do good or cause harm to others, or leave
others to do good or cause harm. We assert that any action that disrupts the
joy, peace, purpose, or balance of the beings or environment around us, shall
inevitably derogate and diminish both the quality and scope of our own joy,
peace, purpose, balance, and meaning. If such detrimental, counter-intuitive
behavior is embraced by many, we propound that all life could cease to exist in the natural, terrestrial world we inhabit.
4. We affirm that we are endowed by Deity with the inalienable liberty to govern and orchestrate our thoughts and our actions, within the bounds circumscribed by the Laws of Nature, known and unknown, and assert that the entire Universe, and we ourselves, are part and parcel of the Creator Architect- Supreme Being and Cosmic Mind we know as God.
5. We assert that God is not expected to be manifest inter personally in our lives, or through prophets or figureheads, but rather, intra-personally and perhaps in other ways too subtle to be understood or detected by our finite human senses.
Through the intrinsic presence of Deity, we are naturally drawn toward love; a
realization of life; a sense of oneness, brotherhood and sisterhood with the
natural world around us; and thus, we are compelled to live sublime and
purposeful lives. Therefore, among the transcendent purposes unique to sapient life such as human beings, is the seeking after self-understanding, and the externalization of the resulting discovery within to positively affect the material and spiritual world around us and all living things and beings whose paths cross our own, to make the world a better, kinder, and gentler place for all its inhabitants.
7 POINT CODE OF CONDUCT
Panendeism additionally sets forth a simple 7-point code of conduct:
1. Approach to understanding external reality: Free -thought (rationality,objectivity, and critical-thinking).
2. Arbiters of external truth: Primacy of science and primacy of reason.
3. The universe and everything within it is sacred: We shall endeavor to do good and not cause harm.
4. Discussing or presenting information regarding external reality: Only
scientifically validated information and proven theories should ever be
presented as fact, while suggestive evidence and hypothesis must always be
presented as speculative.
5. Exploring the nature of self, other, and being: Compassion, passion,
introspection, interconnection, love, friendship, kindness, hope, goodwill,
charity, sincerity, inspiration, music, art, and spirituality are all excellent
examples of the benevolent reason-based processes and mechanisms by which we engage in and experience the full spectrum of wonders that life has to offer us.
6. Discussing or presenting information regarding personal experiences or
self: Panendeism, as an entity of philosophy, shall forever refrain from teaching spiritual practices or mysticism, as they have been used throughout recorded history by organized religions and cults to victimize and gain power over innocent people. However, we do recognize that we live in an amazing universe and welcome individuals to freely discuss and explore their own experiences, keeping in mind that things like spirituality and self are different for each person. Anyone who promotes the contrary position or claims to have special powers, methods, or connection to God should be treated with extreme caution and is perhaps more inclined toward Panentheism than Panendeism.
We encourage exploration, but not evangelism. Personal and public exploration may include any one of a number of things, from sitting atop a mountain as the sun sets or gazing into the vastness of space on a clear night, to a pursuit of science, deep meditation, or the simplest things in life, such as being close to someone you love.
Incompatible with: Organized religion, prophets, figure heads, dogma, false-
information, oppression, and inequality.
PANENDEISM & THE PANTHEISM
Pantheism is the worship of a physical universe and mindless energy force as God, whereas Panendeism postulates that a mindful and transcendent God is the underlying reality of what we perceive as the universe. As with Panentheists, Pantheists tend to present and accept speculations as facts and follow a structure that is more akin to organized religions and dogmatic-theism.
PANENDEISM & PANDEISM
Pandeism is the worship of a physical universe and mindless energy force as a
deceased or destroyed God with a resurrection doctrine that claims God will someday evolve back into being, whereas Panendeism postulates that a mindful and transcendent God is the underlying reality of what we perceive as the universe. A great real-world analogy for this is to imagine the universe as a quantum super-computer.
In this scenario, Panendeism's God would be primarily the processor, memory, and hard drive and Pandeism's God would be the battery. This isn't to say that
Panendeists don't recognize the importance of energy, or see it as part of God, they just don't attribute the vast complexity of the universe solely to it.
PANENDEISM & PANENTHEISM
While Panendeism and Panenthiesm are fairly similar in their base assumptions, Panendeists tend to look at the universe as being purely comprised of mind, while Panentheists tend look at the universe as being a part of the body of God.
Additionally, Panendeists, being a part of the parent organization of Deism, tend to be more agnostic, speculative, and cautious when it comes to forming and presenting opinions about the true nature of reality, whereas Panentheists tend to present and accept speculations as facts and follow a structure that is more akin to organized religions and dogmatic -theism. Panentheists also tend to more commonly view their relationship with Deity as interpersonal, often engaging in prayer and other religious rituals, while Panendeists often view their relationship with God as intra personal and based upon observation of the natural world, science, and reason.
Moreover, Panendeism's rejection of religious dogma allows it the freedom and agility to remain relevant by taking into consideration and adapting to all new knowledge arising at the forefront of our progressive science.
PANENDEISM & DEISM
Panendeism is a recognized member of the Deism Alliance and part of the greater Deism family. As such, Panendeism is not a breakaway from or rejection of Deism, but a concise ontological position within Deism that focuses on the vast sea of contemporary scientific knowledge, especially physics, quantum physics, quantum mechanics, consciousness, and neuroscience. All Panendeists are therefore effectively Deists with a default variation regarding the relationship between Deity and the universe .
PANENDEIST TERMINOLOGY FOR GOD
• Superior-Mind
• Cosmic-Mind
• Cosmic Consciousness
• Divine-Mind
• Word-Soul
• Supreme Being
• Deity
• Divinity
• Great Spirit
• Creator-Architect-Supreme-Being
• Plenum
• The All
• The All-in-All
• The One
SUPPORTIVE THEORIES & MODELS
• Bose-Einstein Condensate
• Particle Wave-Duality
• The Anthropic Principal
• Synaptic Tunneling
• Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
• Pribram's Theory of Sensory Perception
• Bertrand Russell's Consciousness Model
• Michael Lockwood's Theory of Consciousness
• The Theory of Biocentrism
• Alwyn Scott's Consciousness Model
• James Culbertson's Model of Consciousness
• Orchestrated objective reduction (Orch-OR)
• Panpsychism
• Nondualism
REFERENCES
1. Albuquerque Journal, Saturday, November 11, 1995, B-10
2. Letter sent by Einstein to Robert S. Marcus, Political Director of the World
Jewish Congress, offering condolences for his son who had succumbed to polio. February 12, 1950
3. Das Wesen der Materie (The Nature of Matter), a 1944 speech in Florence, Italy.
Source: Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 1 1
Planck, Nr. 1797
4. Werner Heisenberg, 1971, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations, New York: Harper & Row
5. "The Mystic Vision" as translated in Quantum Questions: Mystical Writings of the World's Great Physicists (1984) edited by Ken Wilber
6. Werner Heisenberg, 1971, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations, New York: Harper & Row
7. Speech written by David Bohm in 1987 for the memorial service of his friend
and University of Pennsylvania classmate, Malcolm Sagenkahn.
See other formats
THE PANENDEISM TREATISE
PANENDEISM ORGANIZATION PRESS
By Benjamin Sullivan & James McDermott
© 2017. Panendeism Organization certificate of publication N°- OW120875
PANENDEISM ORGANIZATION PRESS
Panendeism Organization is dedicated to exploring the vast potential of Panendeism, a world view that is both millennia old and has more recently been hailed by many of the greatest physicists as a potentially true representation of reality. From its shocking implications in science, to its affirmation of human dignity, Panendeism is a promising new focus within the parent philosophy of Deism.
Our focus is to analyze the wealth of scientific data that has been accrued over the past century and promote new and revolutionary ways of investigating and expanding potentially groundbreaking fields of research.
Above all else, we are committed to the cultivation and recognition of all humanity as one extended family in which each member is worthy of value, respect, and friendship. We affirm that all life is also worthy of our care,
respect, and admiration.
For more information about our organization and mission, please visit us on the web at www.panendeism.org .
© 2017. Panendeism Organization certificate of publication N°- OW120875 [1]
ETYMOLOGY
Panendeism (or pan-en-deism), pronounced paen'en'dei Iz'sm, is derived from the Greek pan (nav), meaning all, en (sv) meaning in, and deus (Asug), meaning god. The earliest known use of the term was in 1995 by Jim Garvin 1 , a Korean War veteran and Catholic turned Trappist monk. Garvin described his concept of deity as being similar to the "all-pervading Great Spirit" of the Native Americans, and called it "Pan-en-deism." The term “Panendeism” was officially proposed more recently by Larry Copling in 2001.
OVERVIEW
Panendeism is an ontological position that explores the interrelationship between God (The Cosmic Mind) and the known attributes of the universe. Combining aspects of Panentheism and Deism, Panendeism proposes an idea of God that both embodies the universe and is transcendent of its observable physical properties. Although examples of Panendeistic thought can be found as early as the 1st millennium BCE, it was not until nearly 3,000 years had passed, at the dawn of the 20th century, that these ideas began to gain traction as a prevailing scientific model of reality.
The first well recorded teachings that evoke the God hypothesis of Panendeism were introduced by Adi Shankara, who unified the Eastern Philosophy of Advaita Vedanta in Hinduism in the 8th century BCE. Later, in the 4th century BCE, Plato’s philosophy of “The One” or “The Good” introduced these concepts to the West and were subsequently expounded upon by Plotinus as in the 2nd century BCE. Much later, in the 17th century CE, Baruch Spinoza would define God as the only thing that exists in his “Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being,” a work that later earned him the affection of Albert Einstein, who described his own belief as being similar to Spinoza’s.
After Spinoza, German idealism continued to pave the way for Panendeism, with authors such as Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel all leaving behind fantastic works that are certainly worth reading. Other wonderful examples include the Transcendentalism of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman, as well as the 20th century Process Theism of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne.
With the dawn of the 20th century, science had at last begun to advance to a point at which the potential in several millennia of Panendeistic philosophy began to appear consistent with the objective picture of reality. Einstein’s earth shattering publication of special relativity in 1905 opened the flood gates to an entirely new scientific conception for the very basis of what we perceive as reality. The universe could no longer be seen solely in terms of Newton’s static, unchanging celestial spheres. Our understanding of the entire universe was very suddenly 'transformed' to something infinitely more perplexing, but also remarkably more insightful and potentially closer to the true reality of the Universe. Through one equation, Einstein conceived of a dynamic Universe that behaved like a sea of energy arrayed with an expanding fabric of space-time, and comprised of dynamic and interactive energy modules that could take on the form of matter, light/ radiation, or other forms, unknown: E=MC 2 .
Einstein, who would be echoed by other physicists contemplating the scientific
implications of this quantum sea in which we are immersed and of which we are composed, later mused:
“[Man] experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. The striving to free oneself from this delusion is the one issue of true religion. Not to nourish it but to try to overcome it is the way to reach the attainable measure of peace of mind. "[2]
In 1905, Max Planck, the father of quantum theory, was among the first to immediately recognize the significance of Einstein’s (later famous) publication. Indeed, much of the initial notoriety Einstein’s theory received was largely thanks to Planck’s efforts to introduce it within the scientific community. After receiving the Nobel Prize in 1918 and spending a lifetime in Quantum Physics, Planck, as its father, unabashedly said this regarding the nature of reality:
As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter. [3]
As science continued to unravel the mysteries of reality, new proponents of Panendeistic thought emerged. Niels Bohr, who in 1922, received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to atomic structure and quantum theory clearly defined Panendeism in these terms:
“We can admittedly find nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness. Yet all of us know that there is such a thing as consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or, more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics and chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, we must also consider laws of quite a different kind. ”
Erwin Schrodinger, who in 1933, received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on quantum theory, said this:
"It is not possible that this unity of knowledge, feeling and choice which you call your own should have sprung into being from nothingness at a given moment not so long ago; rather this knowledge, feeling, and choice are essentially eternal and unchangeable and numerically one in all men, nay in all sensitive beings. But not in this sense — that you are a part, a piece, of an eternal, infinite being, an aspect or modification of it . . For we should then have the same baffling question:Which part, which aspect are you? What, objectively, differentiates it from the others? No, but, inconceivable as it seems to ordinary reason, you — and all other conscious beings as such — are all in all. Hence, this life of yours. . . is, in a certain sense, the whole. . . This, as we know, is what the Brahmins express in that sacred, mystic formula... 'Tat tvam asi' — this is you. Or, again, in such words as 'I am in the east and in the west, I am below and above, I am this whole world. "
Werner Heisenberg, one of the fathers of quantum mechanics, had this to say
regarding the ultimate nature of reality:
"...The same organizing forces that have shaped nature in all her forms are also responsible for the structure of our minds... Of course, we all know that our own reality depends on the structure of our consciousness; we can objectify no more than a small part of our world. But even when we try to probe into the subjective realm, we cannot ignore the central order. ..In the final analysis, the central order, or the 'one' as it used to be called and with which we commune in the language of religion, must win out. "
David Bohm, a protege of Einstein who's often referred to as one of the most
significant theoretical physicists of the 20th century, said this:
“The field of the finite is all that we can see, hear, touch, remember, and describe. This field is basically that which is manifest, or tangible. The essential quality of the infinite, by contrast, is its subtlety, its intangibility. This quality is conveyed in the word spirit, whose root meaning is "wind, or breath. "
This suggests an invisible but pervasive energy, to which the manifest world of the finite responds. This energy, or spirit, infuses all living beings, and without it any organism must fall apart into its constituent elements. That which is truly alive in the living being is this energy of spirit, and this is never born and never dies.
And these great minds only begin to scrape the surface of names that have both revolutionized science and seen clear implications for a Panendeistic sort of world view. Among many others, Nikola Tesla, Gregory Bateson, Sir Arthur Eddington, Robert Jahn, Sir James Jeans, Henry Margenau, Carl Friedrich Von Weizsacker, Freeman Dyson, and contemporary scientists like Paul Davies and Robert Lanza, have all advocated or affirmed the ontological ideas put forth by Panendeism as both plausible and in perfect harmony with the reality that science reveals to us. Indeed, it is not unfair to say that without the ability of these brilliant minds who forsook their own human perception of reality for the scientific evidence they were presented with, we might never have arrived at the proven theories of quantum physics or relativity, both of which have radically changed the course of human progress over the past century.
Like its parent philosophy Deism, Panendeism is closely related to naturalism and advocates that arguments for the existence of Deity must be maintained through science, reason, and observation of the natural world. Also, as in Deism, Panendeism is reasonably skeptical of - or dismisses religious figureheads, prophets, and claims of divine revelation. Panendeism is more likely to readily avoid the errors of dogma, corruption, oppression, and manipulation often manifest in organized religions, simply because it is self-governed and has no founders, fathers, or leaders. Each Deist or Panendeist, past, present and future, must justify their conclusions and hypotheses by means of the 'God-given' instruments of reason and science. Purely speculative notions are encouraged, where they are presented as speculation.
Likewise, Panendeism is highly skeptical of claims relating to the suspension of natural law through mediums such as supernatural forces or beings. Panendeism does not seek to define the attributes of Deity beyond affirming that the necessary Uncaused First Cause exists and is itself the underlying substance and cause of reality. By necessity of the proposed interconnection between God and reality, Panendeism proposes and presumes that the entire universe and everything within it is both sacred and meaningful. In this way, scientific knowledge, nature, and being are all modes of spiritual connection to Deity. Each sapient being, and to some degree, every living thing, is and must be part and parcel of God.
THE 5 TENETS OF PANENDEISM
Like our progressive science, both Deism and Panendeism represent broad world views that are constantly evolving as knowledge and science progress. However, Panendeism is governed by 5 unchanging principles:
1. We affirm as a defining thesis, that the natural terrestrial world, and the greater Universe we observe are, by very definition, “real,” and acknowledge that these may well be the only semblance of God we shall ever witness with our human eyes. We assert that we, as sapient beings, are an integral part of the whole, and that human observational perception, both material and spiritual, is worthy of our interest, pursuit, and trust.
2. We affirm the primacy of human reason and science as the final arbiters of
truth and error regarding our understanding of the universe, but acknowledge
that human beings embody, by design, integrated intuition and expression that transcend the bounds of science. We propound that qualities such as consciousness, compassion, passion, introspection, interconnection, love, friendship, kindness, hope, goodwill, charity, sincerity, inspiration, music, art, and spirituality, are among these inherent and inspired natural qualities.
3. We affirm that we are, even in our own cognitive abilities, finite. We
acknowledge that human reasoning is limited, our senses and perception are
imperfect, and that we are free to do good or cause harm to others, or leave
others to do good or cause harm. We assert that any action that disrupts the
joy, peace, purpose, or balance of the beings or environment around us, shall
inevitably derogate and diminish both the quality and scope of our own joy,
peace, purpose, balance, and meaning. If such detrimental, counter-intuitive
behavior is embraced by many, we propound that all life could cease to exist in the natural, terrestrial world we inhabit.
4. We affirm that we are endowed by Deity with the inalienable liberty to govern and orchestrate our thoughts and our actions, within the bounds circumscribed by the Laws of Nature, known and unknown, and assert that the entire Universe, and we ourselves, are part and parcel of the Creator Architect- Supreme Being and Cosmic Mind we know as God.
5. We assert that God is not expected to be manifest inter personally in our lives, or through prophets or figureheads, but rather, intra-personally and perhaps in other ways too subtle to be understood or detected by our finite human senses.
Through the intrinsic presence of Deity, we are naturally drawn toward love; a
realization of life; a sense of oneness, brotherhood and sisterhood with the
natural world around us; and thus, we are compelled to live sublime and
purposeful lives. Therefore, among the transcendent purposes unique to sapient life such as human beings, is the seeking after self-understanding, and the externalization of the resulting discovery within to positively affect the material and spiritual world around us and all living things and beings whose paths cross our own, to make the world a better, kinder, and gentler place for all its inhabitants.
7 POINT CODE OF CONDUCT
Panendeism additionally sets forth a simple 7-point code of conduct:
1. Approach to understanding external reality: Free -thought (rationality,objectivity, and critical-thinking).
2. Arbiters of external truth: Primacy of science and primacy of reason.
3. The universe and everything within it is sacred: We shall endeavor to do good and not cause harm.
4. Discussing or presenting information regarding external reality: Only
scientifically validated information and proven theories should ever be
presented as fact, while suggestive evidence and hypothesis must always be
presented as speculative.
5. Exploring the nature of self, other, and being: Compassion, passion,
introspection, interconnection, love, friendship, kindness, hope, goodwill,
charity, sincerity, inspiration, music, art, and spirituality are all excellent
examples of the benevolent reason-based processes and mechanisms by which we engage in and experience the full spectrum of wonders that life has to offer us.
6. Discussing or presenting information regarding personal experiences or
self: Panendeism, as an entity of philosophy, shall forever refrain from teaching spiritual practices or mysticism, as they have been used throughout recorded history by organized religions and cults to victimize and gain power over innocent people. However, we do recognize that we live in an amazing universe and welcome individuals to freely discuss and explore their own experiences, keeping in mind that things like spirituality and self are different for each person. Anyone who promotes the contrary position or claims to have special powers, methods, or connection to God should be treated with extreme caution and is perhaps more inclined toward Panentheism than Panendeism.
We encourage exploration, but not evangelism. Personal and public exploration may include any one of a number of things, from sitting atop a mountain as the sun sets or gazing into the vastness of space on a clear night, to a pursuit of science, deep meditation, or the simplest things in life, such as being close to someone you love.
Incompatible with: Organized religion, prophets, figure heads, dogma, false-
information, oppression, and inequality.
PANENDEISM & THE PANTHEISM
Pantheism is the worship of a physical universe and mindless energy force as God, whereas Panendeism postulates that a mindful and transcendent God is the underlying reality of what we perceive as the universe. As with Panentheists, Pantheists tend to present and accept speculations as facts and follow a structure that is more akin to organized religions and dogmatic-theism.
PANENDEISM & PANDEISM
Pandeism is the worship of a physical universe and mindless energy force as a
deceased or destroyed God with a resurrection doctrine that claims God will someday evolve back into being, whereas Panendeism postulates that a mindful and transcendent God is the underlying reality of what we perceive as the universe. A great real-world analogy for this is to imagine the universe as a quantum super-computer.
In this scenario, Panendeism's God would be primarily the processor, memory, and hard drive and Pandeism's God would be the battery. This isn't to say that
Panendeists don't recognize the importance of energy, or see it as part of God, they just don't attribute the vast complexity of the universe solely to it.
PANENDEISM & PANENTHEISM
While Panendeism and Panenthiesm are fairly similar in their base assumptions, Panendeists tend to look at the universe as being purely comprised of mind, while Panentheists tend look at the universe as being a part of the body of God.
Additionally, Panendeists, being a part of the parent organization of Deism, tend to be more agnostic, speculative, and cautious when it comes to forming and presenting opinions about the true nature of reality, whereas Panentheists tend to present and accept speculations as facts and follow a structure that is more akin to organized religions and dogmatic -theism. Panentheists also tend to more commonly view their relationship with Deity as interpersonal, often engaging in prayer and other religious rituals, while Panendeists often view their relationship with God as intra personal and based upon observation of the natural world, science, and reason.
Moreover, Panendeism's rejection of religious dogma allows it the freedom and agility to remain relevant by taking into consideration and adapting to all new knowledge arising at the forefront of our progressive science.
PANENDEISM & DEISM
Panendeism is a recognized member of the Deism Alliance and part of the greater Deism family. As such, Panendeism is not a breakaway from or rejection of Deism, but a concise ontological position within Deism that focuses on the vast sea of contemporary scientific knowledge, especially physics, quantum physics, quantum mechanics, consciousness, and neuroscience. All Panendeists are therefore effectively Deists with a default variation regarding the relationship between Deity and the universe .
PANENDEIST TERMINOLOGY FOR GOD
• Superior-Mind
• Cosmic-Mind
• Cosmic Consciousness
• Divine-Mind
• Word-Soul
• Supreme Being
• Deity
• Divinity
• Great Spirit
• Creator-Architect-Supreme-Being
• Plenum
• The All
• The All-in-All
• The One
SUPPORTIVE THEORIES & MODELS
• Bose-Einstein Condensate
• Particle Wave-Duality
• The Anthropic Principal
• Synaptic Tunneling
• Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
• Pribram's Theory of Sensory Perception
• Bertrand Russell's Consciousness Model
• Michael Lockwood's Theory of Consciousness
• The Theory of Biocentrism
• Alwyn Scott's Consciousness Model
• James Culbertson's Model of Consciousness
• Orchestrated objective reduction (Orch-OR)
• Panpsychism
• Nondualism
REFERENCES
1. Albuquerque Journal, Saturday, November 11, 1995, B-10
2. Letter sent by Einstein to Robert S. Marcus, Political Director of the World
Jewish Congress, offering condolences for his son who had succumbed to polio. February 12, 1950
3. Das Wesen der Materie (The Nature of Matter), a 1944 speech in Florence, Italy.
Source: Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 1 1
Planck, Nr. 1797
4. Werner Heisenberg, 1971, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations, New York: Harper & Row
5. "The Mystic Vision" as translated in Quantum Questions: Mystical Writings of the World's Great Physicists (1984) edited by Ken Wilber
6. Werner Heisenberg, 1971, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations, New York: Harper & Row
7. Speech written by David Bohm in 1987 for the memorial service of his friend
and University of Pennsylvania classmate, Malcolm Sagenkahn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)