Tuesday 28 July 2020

Another chapter from upcoming ebook (chapter 3.)

Chapter 3

If we do suspect there is a matter of possession of an individual because of things they say or do, then we first must examine any possible physical causes. If there is evidence that leads us to believe that the cause of an individuals’ behaviour is indeed physical then we must empirically measure that cause and the effects resulting from that cause and the condition resulting from it. The physical well being of such an individual is just as important as the mental and spiritual well being of that person. There has to be a process of elimination and deduction which has to be applied in a systematic manner. From this we might find that a physical condition has lead to a mental condition which in turn manifests as a spiritual condition.

It is simply wrong to declare that everything that is wrong in a person is because of the devil, maybe the root cause of a series of conditions and circumstances has a satanic factor but unless we go backwards in identifying and eliminating factors then we will not identify that satanic factor nor be able to deal with other factors which will remain unidentified. There should never be a case of "operation was successful but the patient is dead".

I want to empathise at this point that we are dealing with the possession of a physical body by a djinni and not the activities of dybbuks who haunt people and places; Dybbuks do not possess or 'bonejack' bodies (as a rule but as they are still djinn they might attempt this, this will most likely occur on an atheist who will then approach the person the dybbuk "clings" to in order to convey a message or have 'interaction' with that person). Possession of a body may be an on going matter or a temporary/momentarily one, during my time as a theistic Satanist I had a few occasions where strangers would approach me and give me money for no reason. I very much doubt they understood or remembered those moments, that is because they did not control any aspect of their physical being. Most likely they were atheists and were not entitled to any protection especially if they openly renounced God and did not care to acknowledge anything to do with Satan.

Does atheism invite possession? I think it is better to say that it advertises that a body is available to be possessed, but does not guarantee it. So now let us look at possible causes, the results of which may be mistakenly identified as "possession".

* Brain tumours - These may interfere with segments of the brain which control speech, memory and judgment.
* Pathogens - Virii and microbes may travel in the bloodstream and enter into the brain killing brain matter or developing cysts or else develop conditions which interfere with the brain; Syphilis is an example.
* Circulation problems - If there is an interference of blood flow it may deny oxygen to the brain.
* Neurological disorders - Disturbance in relation to the nerves may manifest in various 'fits'; epilepsy would be an example.
* Allergies - Some people can become hypersensitive to common chemicals which have no effect on 99.9% of other people, reactions to these chemicals can be devastating or fatal. Substances such as lead or the likes of a 'toxic house syndrome' might be mistaken as possession or mental illness by those unaffected by those chemicals and substances.
* Drugs - Both legal and illegal and including those of varying classification. With legal drugs we are dealing with the likes of pharmaceutical prescription drugs and these may include the likes of sedatives and tranquilisers. In addition there is the issue of multiple prescriptions from multiple doctors concerning multiple illnesses. These days it is of no surprise to find someone taking pills for 'anxiety' while at the same time taking pills for a heart condition. On top of that we have the situation where pharmaceutical companies may alter ingredients and recipes for their prescription drugs without the knowledge or understanding of the doctors and patients of these alterations.
In regards to illegal drugs the users of them may be prone to psychosis and paranoia. LSD, methamphetamines (ice) and even marijuana have long term affects resulting from long term use. Street drugs may be altered or 'cut' with a variety of substances without any regard for the users of those drugs, they may be cut with things like baking soda, cleaning products or other pharmaceuticals.
As to substances that are of an uncertain status such as imitation street drugs, these substances are purely artificial and comprise of varying chemical compounds which have been altered so as not to be of the exact same chemical compound as illegal drugs. These 'drugs' imitate the effects of LSD, marijuana, amphetamines among others. We also have to consider and take in that people may be combining various drugs (whether legal or illegal) and that includes alcohol.

* Psychiatric diagnosed illnesses - These are the classic mental illnesses such as manic depression (now generally referred to as bi-polar), schizophrenia and paranoia. Although these are separate conditions you will find that some of those who have these conditions will have the classic symptoms of more than one condition simultaneously (an example being paranoid schizophrenia).
* Various psychological conditions - Myself I think that a lot of these conditions are the result of a victimhood mindset as well as crooked mental health professionals seeking to increase their list of 'clients'. The usual treatment for these ‘conditions’ is usually tranquilisers and sedatives like Prozac and Xanax.
* Sexual abuse - Children and indeed adults who are subjected to repeated sexual abuse may be traumatised to the extent that they may have 'out of body' experiences or else develop separate personalities.
* Near death experience - Something of this nature may lead someone to examine and question their life, and indeed reject the current status quo and indeed their lifestyle or even their persona.
* Isolation - Whether it is because of a shipwreck, solitary confinement in prison, having to reside in a remote location or else lacking the social skills to interact with other people. Then it would not be unreasonable to expect that ones imagination would come into constant use or indeed overuse.
* Gaslighting - People may choose to engage in psychological warfare against someone in order to cause doubt, anxiety and to even question their own sanity. One could include hypnosis in this category.
* Attention seeking - Yes this happens and as we have seen and will continue to see that people will engage in all manner of activities in order to get attention.
* Compulsive liars - Those whom for some unknown reason feel the need to act out as though they are possessed, they may be attention seekers but then again they may not.

* Fraudulent beliefs - We have seen cults based not on any spiritual belief but rather were created in order to defraud its members. Once the fraud was uncovered the members of such cults had no other alternative belief and usually ended up atheist, or else involved in other cults (which may be Satanist or occult based).
* Politically based spiritualism - We can see this in the likes of left wing churches which are essentially Marxist, or else we can see it in the likes of the American black "Nation of Islam" or the "World Church Of The Creator" which is for whites only. These creeds are physically based and not spiritual, left wing churches have a huge percentage of homosexual members. The "Nation of Islam" and the "World Church of The Creator" cater to those of a certain skin colour. They are both atheist and apostate as they do not believe in a spiritual creator and in that void they have redefined God to suit their physically based agenda. And in fact view their 'god' as a collective consciousness based either on skin colour, ethnicity or bloodline etc.; In addition they have redefined their 'Satan' to being those who collectively are not of their skin colour, ethnicity, bloodline, ideological beliefs or gender identity etc.
* Mistaken beliefs - This can occur when one takes wholeheartedly accepts beliefs at face value, in addition there is the issue of trolls who corrupt and pervert various teachings that can be found on the internet. Their reasons for doing so may be varied.
* Occult activity -  A person might be deemed possessed if it is known that they engage in occult activity and they like to boast about it, even though the 'occult activity' might be of a trivial or fantasy role playing game nature. Such judgments are usually made by those with no occult knowledge or those who rely on rumours and misconceptions. However we must take into consideration that people may engage in unknown occult activity which they keep secret.
* Sexual abuse - Children who have been subjected to sexual abuse by the likes of priests, other clergy and those within a religion can end up as atheists or else adopting anti-Abrahamic beliefs.

The fact is that there are people who will stick to the Lucifer/Moloch program because it gives them benefits such as money and power and flow on effects (paedophilia being one). You will find that the pro Satan human traitors consist of haters of God, sociopaths, psychopaths, those of various sexual perversions, opportunists, moral relativists, solipsists and other garbage.

So we have two wings of indoctrination; the first being the excusing and encouragement of various destructive and suicidal activities by people who can be best described as anti-social. The second being acceptance and indifference by everyone else which implies a ‘moral relativism’. This is basically a case of “it doesn’t worry me so why should I care?” Indeed we only have to take a look at the members of government and social influencers/celebrities (though “social justice warriors” might be a more inclusive term for the varieties involved) with various mental ‘disturbances’ or ‘syndromes’ who quite frankly are stark raving mad. These are the sort of people that if their time was not occupied with “activities” would be screaming at telegraph poles and arguing with seagulls. Any society at any given time may contain these sorts of people.

But it is the continual excusing, encouragement and justification of their behaviour that turns the “may” into a definite “will”. And this will increase; because it has to, much like HIV/AIDS or Ebola the end result is the death of the human host who in their lifetime may have infected countless others. However we are dealing with indoctrination which targets the mental and spiritual facilities of the human being and anything that flows on from it is just a bonus as far as the propagandists are concerned. In relation to ‘spiritual propaganda’ we are dealing with what can be best described as “wetiko”. I think the simplest and best way to describe wetiko is as a psychological germ that causes a psychological illness and is spread by psychological means.

This is pretty much a form of PSYOPS or psychological warfare, much like that seen from World War 1 onwards (and before that in a very minor level). There have been various conflicts with various armies looking to turn and recruit civilians within those war zones to remaining loyal to the state, or serving the invading/occupying army or at least be indifferent to it. You can call it groupthink, hivemind, animal magnetism, folie a plusieurs and probably a few other terms as well. We are not dealing with a war purely over land in which people just ‘happen to be there’. No, we now have a war in which the people are the commodity who ‘just happen to live on land’ (but as we see more and more people jammed into cities and stacked upon each other in the likes of units and apartment blocks we would have to say they are occupying ‘air space’ like insects and birds. And if they are deemed annoying or ‘aesthetically displeasing’, they will be eliminated as such.) It is along the lines of attacking and raiding nations in order to get material gain and slaves.
Enslavement can also take the forms of mental, physical and spiritual, but the propagation of enslavement is instilled by indoctrination which is aimed at both slave and slave holder.

Looking at the physical, mental, spiritual and indoctrination factors it can be seen that an originating cause in one factor will then manifest in another if not all factors. Every one of these factors must be investigated and an honest examination as to whether any of these causes have or still are in effect must be dealt with. If it is something like sexual abuse, the "sweep it under the carpet" routine can not apply. The portrayal of an abused child as a drug user, mentally ill, or even possessed must be extinguished and the perpetrators of such abuse must be punished.

Fraudulent and corrupt people, politically correct psychologists and 'counsellors', 'life coaches', role playing attention seekers, sociopaths, narcissists, cults and various opportunists must be exposed and dealt with or else the issue of "possession" will continue to grow.

While the list I wrote above may be extensive, the issues I mentioned must be addressed and dealt with as soon as possible. But this may not be possible due to the status of the person concerned who is suspected of being possessed. Doubt and confusion over the status of the person concerned will lead to the wasting of time in regards treatment whether the issue is of possession or not. In that case we have to prioritise the investigation of the issues from most likely to least likely. I myself would be looking at getting any physical causes checked out through medical examination then investigating mental issues and seeing if there is a genetic factor in regards to inheriting a mental illness from parents, grandparents, etc.

But the most important thing one has to do before even considering anything of this nature is to have themselves checked out and an honest appraisal of any condition that they themselves may be prone to. Self projection must be avoided absolutely! I cannot emphasise this enough. We must see this objectively and without any emotion, there is absolutely no room for personal bias or superstitions. Unless one is prepared to be cool, calm, collected, impersonal and methodical then one should not engage in anything of this nature. However time may be of an essence here and it may require an amount of cajoling and trickery in order to get the person suspected of being possessed in a situation where they can be medically examined.

If after any examination as well as a systematic elimination of possible causes it is found that the person has a medical condition then it should be treated as a medical condition - not as something that needs to be exorcised. There are churches that do healing services as part of their practice and they should be used to complement any medical treatments that the person concerned is undertaking until THEY decide to cease with a particular treatment whichever one that may be. If the person is not possessed then it is their body - not yours! And you have no right to tell them how they live or die.

Anyway let's assume that you have had the suspect person examined in a multitude of ways but no medical evidence has turned up, but they still display behaviour that is disturbing. It is not a matter of rubbing your hands together and thinking "Yay...I'm going to be fighting demons!"
That is in fact the last thing you would want

Monday 27 July 2020

A chapter from my upcoming ebook

I will present a chapter from my work in progress. Comments are welcome...

Chapter 2
Have you heard of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEM)? Or maybe the Church of Euthanasia (COE)? No they are not joke movements or April Fools gags. They in fact do exist and their basis came from the environmentalist movements of the 1970s, which in turn branched off from the hippie movements of the 1960s. Marxism, elitism and sexual perversion are the core ingredients of these types of movements, but people seem to think they are each separate movements which are unrelated to each other. Then again most people have never heard of them and will just palm it off as an internet invention, but VHEM and COE came into being as separate organisations in 1991 and 1992 respectively. So they cannot be written off as an internet invention exclusively but they have used the internet as a way to deliver propaganda. And that's only what I know of, we do not know if there are any other death cults or individual members propagating their deeds under the guise of 'spiritual mental health workers' or doing it by trolling. But history has shown there have been death cults as in the example of self proclaimed 'reverend' Jim Jones with the mass murder and suicide at 'Jonestown' in Guyana (South America) in 1977.

History has shown there have been similar situations where gullible people has been swept up into cult type situations which were supposedly of a spiritual basis but were nothing more than psychology power cults which were indeed based on atheism, apostasy and criminality. The Order of the Solar Temple and Heavens Gate are just two further examples of psychological mind control cults which ended in death for its members and yet were supposedly of a spiritual basis. But what constitutes spirituality these days? Indeed what constitutes a human being for that matter? We have various self proclaimed 'media personalities' and 'experts' handing out their various musings as established fact, which is accepted and repeated by those who live their existence by the media.

The level of complacent stupidity is astounding. I remember in school being taught 'evolution' and that by some sort of miracle somehow chimps turned into human beings. Supposedly all human life can from Africa and this is accepted as an educational and scientific fact. No evidence whatsoever and based on a few bones found in random locations on the African continent, which have been carbon dated so therefore it must be true. Despite the fact that carbon dating can only reasonably date bones and other once living matter up to approximately 3000 years, techniques in radioactive dating are said to estimate up to 6000 years. Even if that is accepted the same sorts of politically motivated and appointed scientists will vehemently exclaim that the universe is four and a half billion years old (4,500,000,000) and that the science is settled!!!

They have no evidence whatsoever and can only offer countless theories in which terms and formula are constantly redefined.

However the "out of Africa" theory is also propagated by the NoI or "Nation of Islam" which is a black supremacist cult in the United States of America. The NoI believes that all white people were created by an evil black scientist named "Yakub" (yes the Biblical and Koranic Jacob) and that all black people collectively are 'Allah' or 'god'. This is definitely not Islam; it is apostasy because it is fair to say it is atheist. But try to get on TV to say that, it would never happen. You would see both black supremacists and evolutionary scientists combining to first stop you from being acknowledged by any media or "no platforming". Then you would be facing an endless series of lawsuits designed to bankrupt you (known as lawfare). Ultimately these types of people want to see you in prison or homeless on the street, and they want to see you utterly destitute and dead.

This is what motivates these people, and state educational facilities have become factories which manufacture these sorts of people. And everyday there is always the screaming and finger point at anyone who disagrees with these sorts of people along with the claim of "YOU'RE RACIST!" Now on top of that you are accused of being homophobic, transphobic, antisemitic, islamophobic etc. and whatever buzzwords are fashionable or politically correct.

However you have to understand that this is not a recent phenomena, there was a long lead up into what we are seeing and unfortunately experiencing today. Have you heard of the Urantia Book? Or Oahspe? What about the occult orders of the Golden Dawn and Ordo Templis Orientis (OTO)? Maybe Aleister Crowley, Jack Parsons and Thelema? You've certainly heard of L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology. Have you heard of terms such as the "Maitreya" or the "Cosmic Christ"? Do you know about Theosophy or ever heard of Alice Bailey?

As the musings of Charles Darwin and his evolution thesis quackery have become embedded into human consciousness today through state education, the concepts and beliefs from the people and books I just mentioned have done so in a very, very subtle way. So if you didn't come from apes then you came from aliens, and if you don't believe either you must have 'mental illness'. Indeed if we look at the period between World War 1 and World War 2 we see where the likes of psychiatry and psychology set up their foundation for today. From this we now see how these fractions complement and supplement each other in order to make a greater whole. Let us briefly examine the various 'new age' factors from back then and see where they go in this jigsaw puzzle.

Aetherius Society
Formed in 1955
Components: UFO/Alien beliefs, various fragments of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Theosophy. Incorporates varying beliefs in karma, yoga, altruism, reincarnation, environmentalism, channeling and evolution.

Unarius Academy of Science
Formed in 1954
Components: UFO/Alien beliefs, channeling, reincarnation and evolution.

Nation of Islam
Formed in 1930
Components: UFO/Alien beliefs, Black supremacy, various fragments and reinterpretations of Christianity and Islam. Since 2010 the Nation of Islam has incorporated the subject of Dianetics from Scientology.

Formed in 1952
Components: UFO/Alien beliefs, is essentially atheist because its definition of God is the "eighth dynamic" which is not defined. Is based around mental health but has a disdain for psychiatry and psychology, something to note - L. Ron Hubbard was associated with John "Jack" Parsons who was in the O.T.O and a practitioner of Thelema.

Urantia Book
Published in 1955
Components: UFO/Alien beliefs, this is a book that was composed of supposedly 20 years of records of an involuntary channeller. To explain further you need to look the life of William Samuel Sadler who was an 'usher' in a mental hospital/sanatorium at the age of 15. He then went on to be a psychiatrist and the Urantia Book is the result of notes taken while a patient (known as the 'sleeping subject') channelled this information while sleeping or otherwise unconscious. The Urantia Book is just over 2000 pages long and delves into multiple galaxies which compose the "greater galaxy" in which are multiple inhabited planets. The writing down/recording of these channelled messages came about from meeting between members of what can be called "rich white upper class" members of society and mental patients. Indeed William Samuel Sadler married Lena Kellogg (yes the Corn Flakes family) who also became a psychiatrist. An interesting thing to note is that they see the Lord Jesus Christ returning not under that name but as a “Michael of Nebulon”. Compare that to the Jehovahs Witnesses who believe that the Lord Jesus Christ was really the Archangel Michael.

Published in 1882 then republished (and reedited) in 1891. The book is supposedly of "automatic writing" (or more accurately typing), and can be said to be a stepping point from which various forms of channeling came from (or at least an example of).
It took in various pagan theologies, has a form of evolution in which veganism plays a dominant part. I also note some talismans from Oahspe which are similar (if not the same) to those used in Black magic and demonic spirit working. 

So far with these organisations we have seen the alien/UFO tenet of their beliefs as being a central part. We see that the subject of evolution is a factor as well, but with the alien/UFO part we see that it is not so much to do with little green men and flying saucers; instead it is to do with 'spiritual' evolution. There is also splitting and grafting bits and pieces from various religions as well as the reinterpreting of central beliefs and dogma. But the most striking in all this is the use of channeling which has an equal value in these groups (and their splinter groups, imitators, deviations, etc).
Back to the present, we see the likes of evolution being propagated as spiritual and physical 'progress' and this does include atheism (defined as proof of no single identifiable creator entity) in relation to God. And the physical evolution progress includes people (especially white women) who produce mixed race children; it also includes children who are reaching puberty at earlier ages (try food additives) and men who identify as "transgender". Yet those who advocate this 'progress' have no non-white members in their family, feed their children exclusively organic food and would expel anyone from the family if it was suspected they were gay.

These are the sort of people who believe in preserving their bloodline as an exclusive and elite entity much like royal bloodlines. Really when you look at this situation this is how the Egyptian gods of ancient times functioned. They were depicted with animal heads to disguise the fact that when the holder of a god status died they would be replaced by one of their children. If this seems to you to be a plot from a bad science fiction show or a vision of some dystopia world, well it is and you are the background and cameo actors. God created mankind in his image but now we are being remolded in someone elses'.

I cannot say that every person who got involved in these sorts of religions/organisation/beliefs is utterly evil, they may have joined because they had unanswered questions and thought they could find an answer in these types of groups. Maybe they wanted to believe in UFOs, aliens and occult practices. Or maybe the church took them for granted so they were fed any old slop, after all I became a theistic Satanist because I wanted to believe in magic and I didn't care where it came from. I left Satanism and returned to it because I couldn't get a decent explanation about God and was sick of being taken for granted and served slop. 

This is how I know and recognise the motivations of people joining these types of groups, but I also recognise how they are attacking mainstream religions and especially Christianity. A reversal of order is taking place; the concrete has been laid but hasn't yet dried. But it will unless we can disrupt its elements and stop them supplementing each other.
This is a war being waged on all spiritual, mental and physical levels, and it's obvious to say sex is a good motivator. Let me introduce you to these two perverted monsters, Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey.

Wilhelm Reich: Even as a child he had fantasies of having sex with servants and his mother (his mother committed suicide after Reich told his father she was having an affair). Reich then partnered up with Sigmund Freud and Isidor Sadger in "psychoanalysing" of female mental patients, he married one named Annie Pink (he was married twice and had numerous affairs which usually ended with abortion) and they both became doctors and psychoanalysts (much like William Samuel Sadler and Lena Kellog).
He was a member of the communist party and he linked psychoanalysis, Marxism, child sex and sexual revolution so blatantly that even communist groups avoided publishing his essays. One of his works was "The Mass Psychology of Fascism" in addition to his promoting child sex, abortion and molesting his patients or else having affairs and just plain sex with them. Reich moved to the United States of America where he established the Orgonomic Infant Research Center (OIRC) in 1950, although Reich didn't sexually assault children his "therapists" did. The story of Wilhelm Reich is worthy of being that of a bad guy in a James Bond 007 movie, but you should research it yourself. He died in prison in 1957.

Alfred Kinsey: A bisexual man in an open marriage who had an interest in children, made numerous sexual studies in which the majority were prisoners or ex-prisoners, or else were prostitutes and altered records to claim that homosexuals were just "single". He was the author of the Kinsey reports and developed the Kinsey scale in which the number zero (0) means that you are exclusively heterosexual while the number six (6) means you are exclusively homosexual. This was a forerunner for the numerous "genders" we have today and Kinseys' "research" was used in the "sexual revolution" in the 1960s. Kinsey was also an atheist and this vile bastard died in 1956.
When you look at all the forms of "sexual liberation" today it is fair to say that the work of Reich and Kinsey played a part in their formation, most notably in the 'sexual revolution' of the 1960s. Indeed the flow on effects to this day can be seen in the likes of pornography, abortion, third wave feminism and general sexual narcissism. But another (and probably the worst) flow on effect is the countless number of children who grow up never knowing who their father is, and most likely never will. Yet unbelievably among academics, feminists, and intellectuals these two are considered revolutionaries and have a cult like status. Much like the leaders of the Marxist era in Eastern Europe and the third world during the time of the Soviet Union such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Ceausescu, Castro, and of course Che Guevara and Trotsky who are still worshiped today at the altar of atheism (note: Che Guevara supposedly practiced Condomble, a type of voodoo but I have no evidence on that).

Remember there were two revolutions in Russia, the first one overthrew the Czar and established a provisional government. The second one was the Bolshevik revolution which would be better called the Jewish revolution which overthrew the provisional government and was meant to take all of Europe. The chaos caused by the like of Leon Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg (all Jewish) and others like Reich (again Jewish) was about establishing a nominal religious caste supremacy on an ethnic basis. It continues on today, aided and abetted by governments around the world. Don't worry I will expose the Jewish Sabbatean movement in further chapters.

You probably are thinking right now "well... where do the demon or djinn or whatever you want call them come into it?!?”

Well let's look at the metaphysical workings of the times. You had the "New Thought" era in the late 1800s and the UFO and Alien cults which set themselves up in the 1950s. Remember the people of that time had never seen the likes of warfare from WWI or WWII before, so everything was turned on its head. During that time people did not find solace in established religions and turned to the likes of clairvoyants, mediums, and the spiritist/spiritualism realm in order to find out what happened to missing relatives in war zones and so on.

Todays' people do not care or just seem to think life was simple and easy back then, it wasn't. There were two world wars and the very real possibility of further wars, revolutions and insurgencies, basic and somewhat expensive medical treatments, poor anaesthetics and painkillers compared to today, the great depression, etc. Along with religions which expected compliance and never expected to be challenged, so they took everyone for granted. People lived and survived through that period. And the knowledge of what they experienced and learned has been made available and passed on to further generations, and its influence in modern life has existed in various forms. 

The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Aleister Crowley, the Rosicrucian AMORC organisation, Thelema, Wicca, have you heard of these? Wicca wasn't invented yesterday nor is it anything to do with the Druids, it is merely the experiences of Gerald Gardner made into a system by Aleister Crowley. What about Thelema? Try a combination of ancient Egyptian magic and yoga again by Aleister Crowley. Ever noticed the cross used by the Church of Scientology? The one which looks like a crucifix with a St.Andrews' type cross at the centre join, it's the same cross used by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Did you know L. Ron Hubbard was supposedly in AMORC? (No big deal so was I) What about Karl Marx? He was just an atheist... right!? No he wasn't, I learned in my Satanist days that Karl Marx was indeed one of us.

I know you were expecting me to give you instant solutions to the issues of possession and exorcism, but unless you fully understand the problem and its history then you will never be fully confident that you have eradicated that problem on a permanent basis. So we are not just dealing with a few people possessed by a few demons, we are dealing with mass possession by various parties working to a common aim whether or not they realise or know it.

The human vehicles for setting up the conditions and transporting possession are atheism, various designer mental conditions/syndromes/illnesses, various politically correct forms of indoctrination, psychology and psychiatry, etc. These are only minor assaults compared to spiritual possession, really they are just a 'softening up' of a target before the main offensive. But the minor assaults accumulating are in themselves a momentary major offensive, but with no established end goal. Or the goal is unknown to those who launch and fight them; it doesn't matter because they are disposable. This is a satanic offensive and atheists are just cannon fodder. There is no contract between atheists and the Satanic realm, the enemy of my enemy is not a friend but just another enemy in this case.

Here are a few things for you; the Urantia book teaches that children do not possess souls until the ages of five or six. Post-birth abortion advocates currently advocate “that children are not self conscious until the ages of five or six” as the excuse of justifying child murder. Professor Peter Singer is one of them and I do not doubt that this comes from the Urantia Book. I also point the finger at William Samuel Sadler in regards to the “sleeping subject”. A mental hospital full of neglected and abandoned people would have provided a perfect opportunity for someone in his position to perform human experiments. Especially in relation to occult matters, the patients could have been subject to ceremonies and rituals in order to get them possessed. And from there information would have been gained from the djinni or djinn doing the possession. William Samuel Sadler was nothing more than the Josef Mengele of the spiritual world.

The Nation of Islam believes all white people are devils on both an individual and collective basis.

The “Reverend” and founder of the Church of Euthanasia (Chris Korda) is a transsexual.

The Ancient Mystical Order of the Rosy Cross (AMORC) or Rosicrucianism as it is commonly known has no relationship with Christianity. In fact Rosicrucianism, Enochian Magic and Thelema all claim ancestry from ancient Egyptian magic and practices. Freemasonry calls its 'god' Jahbulon, which is a syncretisation of three different entities. They are Jah (the God aspect of the Kabbalah Tree of Life, from the sephira of Chokmah. Bul, to supposedly to mean Baal. However it is the name Bael which I think is more correct; Baal simply means "lord" while Bael is the name of a djinni (or demon if you like). On is meant to name Osiris, so we have Jah-Bul-On or Jahbulon. The name is made in the same way other 'gods' were syncretised in ancient Egypt, most probably the result of marriages between the families of title holders. And another part to the jigsaw is that Moses was an Egyptian prince and would have been taught the magical practices of back then.

Today we have the likes of psychiatry, psychology, and social justice being touted as secular instruments of 'logic' and 'reason' and 'progress'. However from what you have just read do you hold that to be true?


Wednesday 1 July 2020

My argument to prove God exists (IIf)

6.) Non-Theists

When you mention the issue of non-theists the first thing people will think of is usually Buddhism, and thats if they have ever actually thought about it at all.

Actually the term 'non-theist' isnt actually the proper term, if we examine those who supposedly come under this umbrella term we will see that they are not non-theist but actually non-Deist. To say that one is non-theist is to say that one does not hold or adhere to any form of theology pertaining to any religion they hold or adhere to. This is wrong.

If we name some religions that come under (quite mistakenly) 'non-theist' such as Buddhism, Jainism, Taoism, and various 'ancestor worship' practices we will find that there is a theology that accompanies them. The difference between these religions and Abrahamic ones (and their derivatives) is the 'personification' of the Creator or God. I will now refer to these 'non-theists' as non-deists.

But non-theism does occur between religions and within religions, for example a Sunni may see a Shiite as a non-theist because they do not hold the same theology as themself, thus the Shiite by calling themself a Muslim is committing apostasy.

It is not only an issue between sects but also within sects, a hassidic jew will see a liberal jew as a non-theist apostate, a Catholic will see a Protestant as a non-theist apostate. A Baptist will see an Anglican as non-theist, a Traditional Catholic (pre Vatican II) would actually see Pope Francis as non-theist and most likely (with reasonable cause) as an apostate.

However with the non-Deist religions this also occurs, some Buddhists see the Dalai Llama as the chief of Buddhism while others do not, some Jains do believe there are gods (who are only of a minor standing) while others do not. So some non-Deists do factor in gods and demons into their religion while others may seem to be utterly atheist. It is not that they believe their is no higher power, it is their definition of that higher power which cannot be directly translated into an Abrahamic equivalent or understanding.

It is a matter of transliteration rather than translation, a Buddhist will speak of cycles of time while a Christian will speak of revelation and prophecy. Likewise, a Christian will speak of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ while a Buddhist will say how a cycle of time or 'circumstances' have a personal relationship to themself. So the only real difference between the two is the personification or non-personification and definition of the higher power, or spirit, or God.

If you want an example of non-theism in a Deist context then you should examine the Unitarian church and the UU church which can cater for various people of various beliefs- theist, deist, atheist and combinations of each. So really if you don't adhere to an absolute theist belief then you can hold a Deist belief with complimentary theology.

The only real problem with non-Deist religions/faiths/creeds to that they may be infiltrated by atheist dogma. This may be possible as non-Deism make allow for the veneration of the likes of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and so on. But the Buddhists and Taoists have had first hand experience in China with enforced atheism, so in that respect Theists and Deists have more in common than bickering over largely trivial theology.

End of section 2