Part4
Idolatry
Toward the end of the first century the first epistle of John was written to combat the growing menace of Gnosticism. This little book is outstanding in all Christian literature for its teachings of love and purity and fellowship with God. The letter ends with the simple counsel, "Little children, keep yourselves from idols." Obviously the idols John meant were the false teachings against which he had been warning them.
Idolatry may be the worship of material objects; it may be the worship of some manifestation of God in place of God Himself; or it may be the worship of a false conception of God in place of the true. The idols of modern civilization are different from the idols of ancient paganism, and Christian idols may be more deceptive than heathen. One form of idol worship is the adulation of the human personality. A human being may express a high quality of spiritual goodness – or godliness – but he is not the creator of that goodness. Jesus, the Master, declared, "I can of mine own self do nothing" (John 5:30); "The Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works" (John 14:10).
Jesus and Christ
Jesus was not understood by many of the people of his time, especially his enemies. It is important to understand the dual nature of Christ Jesus, otherwise some of his statements about himself seem contradictory and hard to understand. Christian Science dispels the mystery. It points out that Jesus was the name of the human man who was born, brought up, carried out his mission, and at last disappeared to material sense. The name was common among Hebrew boys and men.
But this man Jesus was different from all other men who have ever walked the earth. To state it simply, he knew more about God than any man before or since; he lived what he knew, and he proved the practical power of spiritual understanding in overcoming every type of human trouble – sin, danger, disease, and even death itself. His friends and associates soon began to perceive that here, right in their midst, was a truly Godlike character. While it reached its highest expression in and through the man Jesus, it was not for him exclusively. Others began to share the divine understanding; their lives, too, became imbued and inspired with the divine nature, enabling them also to do great works of healing. For centuries the Jewish people had expected some such manifestation of godliness among them; earlier writers foretold its appearing as the Messiah, the Christ, the Coming One, Immanuel, or God with us. So when Jesus began to teach and heal, many devout Jews recognized that he was indeed bringing what they had been waiting for.
Christ, as defined in Science and Health (p. 583), is "The divine manifestation of God, which comes to the flesh to destroy incarnate error." Jesus' work, in revealing the power and presence of God on earth, was incomparable. He stands alone. So the word Christ was attached to him as a title. It stands for the Godlike nature which animated him, and must not be confused with Jesus as the name of the human person.
Dual Nature
Keeping in mind this dual nature, we see how inaccurate it is to say that Christ was born on Christmas Day, or that Christ was crucified and died. It was Jesus who was born and later crucified and rose from the dead; the Christ, or true spiritual nature, was quite untouched by these material changes, just as the quantity two remains unchanged when you erase the figure 2 from the blackboard.
The quantity two is a mental conception; the figure 2 is a material symbol. The symbol is subject to change or erasure; the quantity is always the same because it is a mental conception.
Sometimes Jesus spoke of himself as the son of man, meaning Jesus the son of Mary. At other times he called himself the Son of God, referring to the Christ or spiritual manifestation of God. Some of his later followers became confused on this point. He had said, "I and my Father are one" (John 10:30).
Mrs. Eddy, in the textbook, explains that this means one in quality, not in quantity, "as a drop of water is one with the ocean" or "a "ray of light one with the sun" (see Science and Health 361:15-17).
But the early Christians fell into the same error of which the Jews accused Jesus, the error of believing the man Jesus to be equal with God. After three hundred years it was definitely declared to be the creed of the Christian church that Jesus was God. This led to the idolatrous worship of the human personality and praying to Jesus as God.
One Mind versus Minds Many
The bedrock of true religion is the First Commandment – one God, infinite and good. One God means one Mind. Human belief would divide the one infinite Mind into many finite minds, distribute one to each person, encase it in a body of flesh, separate it completely from the one supreme intelligence, and let it go on from there operating strictly on its own, progressing or retrogressing in good or evil, as the case might be, according to whatever standard or rule it sets up for itself.
The belief of a mind and reality apart from God is the one basic error. This error is responsible for all the troubles of mankind. The belief is that there are many minds, one to each person. Each so-called human mind turns in upon itself, tries to prove itself self-sufficient, develops its own will, and takes pride in its achievements. It calls itself "I" – spelled with a capital letter. This human egotism swells into a great seeming, and yet it is basically unreal and erroneous. The call of Christian Science is to uncover this falsity, denounce it and cast it out, and return to the simple basic facts as set forth in the First Commandment of Moses and demonstrated by Jesus the Christ with great power and signs following: one God, one Mind, one Principle, infinite, good, present, understandable, and demonstrable. The reflection or expression of the true God is seen in the real man and universe.
Spiritual Leadership
Mrs. Eddy's discovery of Christian Science was the revelation to her of the truth of God and man: one Mind expressing itself in an infinitude of spiritual ideas. It included the uncovering of the claims of evil: many minds, knowing both evil and good, and the belief that there is real substance-matter outside the infinitude of Spirit. Finally, it included the demonstration that the understanding of these facts will cure disease, dispel sin, and harmonize human existence.
The Discoverer of Christian Science is also the Founder of our church. The members of this church are governed by the divinely inspired rules in the Church Manual. The purpose of this organization is to restore to Christianity the lost element of healing; to heal and transform, but not to deify the human personality. Having seen how the worship of human personality had entered the early Christian church as a great mental and moral cloud, depriving Christians of spiritual understanding and power to heal, she resolved to keep it out of Christian Science. She declares: "Person is not in the question of Christian Science. Principle, instead of person, is next to our hearts, on our lips, and in our lives" (Miscellaneous Writings, p. 135).
She consistently exhorted her followers not to pursue her personality but to find her in her writings. While she demanded strictly that her place as Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science and author of its textbook should be recognized and acknowledged, this was not because of any desire for personal glory but because she understood that mortal mind would make its attack upon her discovery by first trying to discredit her as the discoverer. The discovery must stand because it is true; the discoverer must be acknowledged because she was God's instrument.
Mrs. Eddy is no longer with us in person, but her revelation of man as the perfect expression of God remains to lead her followers on to clearer vision and unerring demonstration. There are no personal leaders in Christian Science churches, but there is no lack of leadership. The revealed Principle and rule of true being is studied and obeyed by students of Christian Science and so provides spiritual leadership for all the churches and their members, leadership that is wise, positive, and effective.
A stranger going to a Christian Science church need have no concern as to whether or not he is getting in with the right people; he is getting in with the right Principle. He need not wonder who runs the church, for the true Church is spiritual, and Christian Scientists work to understand God's government and submit to it. "Again I repeat, person is not in the question of Christian Science" (Miscellaneous Writings, p. 135).
Showing posts with label zionist apostate xtians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zionist apostate xtians. Show all posts
Sunday, 4 August 2019
Wednesday, 6 July 2016
The curse of chiliasm
The curse of chiliasm
What is chiliasm? It is a jewish heresy that has become ingrained into Christianity, originally it was a prophecy regarding the endtimes. However as judaism is for jews only (by maternal bloodline) we can say that the prophecy was for jews only and only concerned the ancient Israelite world of the time. That prophecy came true in 70AD when the Romans destroyed the 2nd Temple in Jerusalem and destroyed the geneology records and that should be the end of the subject about that particular prophecy, but as we see it is reinfecting the dying body of Christianity much in the same way as HIV.
It is now being propagated by the likes of Zionist Apostate Xtians (I refuse to call these parasites Christian as there is nothing remotely Christian about them; I call them ZAX) as well as nutjob cults who are all headed by some loon who thinks he is Jesus and the followers regard them as such. It is also in the interests of the state of Israel and jewish zionists in general to ensure this propagation for political and financial ends instead of religious ones. Either by stupidity, gulliability or just plain corruption the ZAX have adopted this expired jewish heresy and seek to make it a current viable prophecy in Christianity, they propagate the idea that it is the purpose of Christians to serve the state of Israel, to serve zionism and to serve jews. ZAX seek to redefine Christianity from a faith that believes in Jesus Christ into one that serves jews, zionists and Israel (a type of unholy trinity really...) despite the fact that these three entities are largely atheist and that any spiritual aspect in them is pantheist. Modern judaism cannot be said to be an Abrahamic faith or a Mosaic faith as those who call themselves jews are not descendants of Abraham, Moses or even their tribes or even those of ancient Israel.
Todays jews are infact descendants of converts such as the askhenazim who are descendants of georgian and chechen converts, the same applies to sephardim who are descendants of Berber and Iberian converts. You also have various subsaharan africans claiming to be jews, as well as cochini (Indian) jews and even self proclaimed jews in China. These grubs are not semitic in the slightest but are just filth looking for easy money, a free trip to Israel, an Israeli passport and a springboard to Europe.
The only jews who have some claim to Israel are the Falashas and Musawis, the Falashas are Ethiopian jews who have a miniscule claim due to being descendants of the kingdom of the Queen of Sheba but the line of descendance is so remote that it no longer counts. The Musawi on the other hand are indeed recognised as having a right to live in Israel, but only by the Palestine Liberation Organisation charter that recognises them as Palestinians of the Judaist faith. However neither the jewish state of Israel nor ZAX recognises them as ethnic arabs who practice the judaist faith but instead has deemed them to be sephardic jews even though there is no bloodline connection. To claim that sephardic jews and Musawis are the same people is the same as saying Spanish and Italians are the same people because they look kinda similiar and use the same alphabet. As bigoted as this is, the ZAX will claim that it is a holy duty of all Christians to believe this because the jews said so (despite the fact they are not descendants of ancient Israelites or even believe in God, and if they do its not the same one everyone else believes in).
So let us examine the two key figures of ZAX chiliasm as well see it today (at this point I want to give credit to Brother Nathanael whose YouTube clips about zionist xtians are certainly worth watching), those two figures are John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Scofield. Their innane and opportunistic rantings are the backbone of ZAXism today which are being peddled by John Hagee.
John Nelson Darby
This guy started off in the Church of Ireland but later left to become involved in the Plymouth Brethren and from there he founded the Exclusive Brethren. His spin was his personal take on dispensationalism and futurism which is now held as 'the rapture' but pre-tribulation rapture theology was what he peddled with the Plymouth Brethren. His crankery increased with the invention of the telegraph which he saw as an invention of Cain and a harbinger of Armageddon and a definite sign that the end of the world was coming.
I'll just paste in this bit from the wikipedia page about Darby....
Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy.
So here we have Darby stating that for whatever reason that prophecy from the Old Testament regarding jews must be given priority because that is what God wants according to their (brethren) understanding. Is Darby saying that he and his stooges/captives know what God is going to do before God does? This sort of megalomania is quite evident when one examines the Exclusive Brethren.
At best this can be described as heresy or else it is better described as a personality cult which passes for xtian.
Cyrus Scofield
The author of the Scofield Reference Bible which is the indoctrination book of ZAX, although ZAX would like to portray Scofield as an enlightened progressive scholar the fact is the truth is quite opposite.
Cyrus Scofield was actually:
A drunk
A bigamist - he deserted his 1st wife and 2 children, the wife sued for divorce on grounds of desertion but Scofield actually remarried before the divorce was finalised.
And we have this as well from wikipedia....
In 1871, Scofield was elected to the Kansas House of Representatives, first from Atchison for one year and then from Nemaha County for a second. In 1873 he worked for the election of John J. Ingalls as senator from Kansas, and when Ingalls won, the new senator had Scofield appointed U. S. District Attorney for Kansas—at 29, the youngest in the country. Nevertheless, that same year Scofield was forced to resign "under a cloud of scandal" because of questionable financial transactions, that may have included accepting bribes from railroads, stealing political contributions intended for Ingalls, and securing bank promissory notes by forging signatures. It is possible Scofield was jailed on forgery charges, although there is no extant evidence in the public records.
If anything Cyrus Scofield was nothing more than a street hustler with expensive tastes and in fact both Darby and Scofield were lawyers by profession. They were just grubs looking to peddle their spin to jews and indeed anyone unfortunate enough to cross their paths. They are certainly not to be admired or respected. The sort of people they were can be seen today in the likes of John Hagee who is just another opportunist who likes the jetset lifestyle.
Now let us deal with the issue of Messianic Judaism, although people think of the term 'messianic jews' and simply think they are jews who have converted to Christianity this certainly isnt the case. If you convert to Christianity then that makes you a Christian and not a jew of some sort in relation to religious terms. Are there jews who have converted to Christianity? Yes and we see that with Brother Nathanael who identifies himself as an Orthodox Christian and not as a 'messianic jew' or any sort of jew.
Messianic Judaism is for jews only, they dont seek to recruit ZAX and at best ZAX might be regarded as associates or in reality just plain brown nosing stooges. One should look at the Messianic Judaism setup as a punk movement within Judaism, in it Jesus Christ isnt regarded as an aspect of God or having a God aspect; Rather he is a figurehead or totem like Sid Vicious was within the punk movement. Jesus Christ is respected by these jews not because of who and what he was but rather because he was a jew anti-hero who got the goyim to worship him as mainstream judaism aims to do for all jews in regards to the goyim (yes...thats non jews...in other words you and me). Messianic Judaism has remodelled Jesus Christ into some sort of punk Buddha. The ZAX are not in on the joke so they are the butt of it and indeed so is anyone else who falls for their spin.
So lets say a ZAX (or anybody else for that matter) wants to become a 'kosher christian'; How would they go about it?
Well first they would have to convert and be accepted into mainstream Judaism, they would have to study for 1-3 years. They would get instant acceptance depending on what they can do for zionism/global jewry (such as politicians, celebrities, etc), if they are poor or else bums they will be discouraged from trying to convert and told they can serve jewry by becoming or remaining a ZAX. If they do convert and do decide to become a Messianic Judaist then they will finally realise the joke but wont be able to do anything about it because they have invested so much time and money into this venture that they have alienated non jewish friends and face the real risk of leaving bankrupt.
They can only continue on in this new tribe in a cloud of self deceit much in the same way they were when they were ZAX. In my opinion this could explain the number of neurosies within the jewish community. I suppose this is always possible when one realises that ones history has been a lie.
Now one has to ask where mainstream modern judaism comes into this, well let us look at the situation. We have a group of people who call themselves jews who claim to be descendants of the ancient Israelites and anything that has to do with them.
But as we have things like DNA testing and the internet where there is a free flow of all sorts of information, we are seeing these ancient Israelite claims repeatedly challenged and increasingly refuted. The fact is that todays jews are not descendants of Abraham, Moses, or any ancient Israelites - they are descendants of converts and cannot call themselves 'the seed of Abraham' and they cannot call themselves 'Gods chosen people'.
With the overwhelming amount of jews who are either atheist or pantheist it cannot be said that they worship the God as worshiped by Abraham or Moses. What we have is not people who adjust themselves to comply to a religion but rather we have a religion which is being constantly remolded to comply to people. Todays judaism is not based on the Torah but instead is based on the Talmud, this is the same Talmud that condones pedophilia, calls non jews filth, calls the Virgin Mary a slut and says that Jesus Christ is in hell in a pool of boiling shit.
The fact is that judaism has had no prophets since the time of Jesus Christ, the only 'jews' who have attempted to convey prophecy on behalf of judaism are pagan converts and all they have done is inject vague prophecies from other religions into judaism to give the appearance of being the continuous line of Abraham, Moses and ancient Israel. An example of this is the issue of the AntiChrist in Christianity or the Dajjal of Islam, the jews came up with Armilus as their equivalent. But this has come after the prophecies of the AntiChrist/Dajjal despite the fact that these jews claim to be a direct line of descent from the ancient Israelites and have a continuous line of the gift of prophecy.
So where does chiliasm come into all this? Well considering that chiliasm is indeed an ancient Israelite prophecy and that it only applied to ancient Judaists and that the 'doomsday' aspect occurred in 70AD with the destruction of the 2nd Temple and destruction of the geneology records. But seeing as the jews had their Messiah - that being the Lord Jesus Christ crucified by the Romans, then the prophecy could not be fulfilled as it was recieved. So todays jews who are the descendants of pagan converts are now seeking to bring forth that prophecy to be fulfilled as it was recieved. And this is being percieved as certainly possible with events and circumstances as they are today.
With ZAX, messianic jews, the increase of atheism and various new age type pantheist thinking, the acceptance of anti-Christian type philosophies which require a religious devotion and a general tone of apathy as well; Then this 2nd shot at chiliasm may certainly be possible.
Overview
We seem to be dealing with a singular aspect on a multi-headed monster, whatever reasons the likes of 'christian zionism' or really better called 'Zionist Apostate Xtianity' was invented for its current purpose is to serve the zionist state of Israel and nothing else. I sometimes wonder and have to ask why these people dont join the likes of British Israelism, it seems that ZAX have a need to be servile. But all they actually achieve is being so vile, if they are not to be called ZAX then the appropriate word for them would be cucks. If there are no jews to serve under the name of atheist zionism then they would be willing slaves to the likes of the black American group called the Nation of Islam. These people hate themselves with pride in being debased, quite frankly these loathsome creatures are HIV to everything that is remotely European.
I'll just add this on:
1. There is a miniscule and dying minority of Judaists who do believe in the concept of God as was taught by Moses, these people should not refer to themselves as jews but rather as those who believe in the 'Mosaic faith'.
2. Musawis should be recognised for what they are - semitic Palestinians who believe in the Mosaic faith, they are not sephardim. The PLO charter of 1967 recognises them as such.
3. If Christian churches want to peddle the expired jewish prophecy of chiliasm then they should no longer be classified as Christian but instead must be referred to as chiliastic.
4. ZAX must be expelled from churches as they do engage in and propagate apostasy.
5. Judaism can no longer be accepted as an Abrahamic faith because it is overrun with atheists and pantheists.
6. There are physical (maternal bloodline) jews and there are 'spiritual' jews, the former should never be recognised as being of the Mosaic faith (unless they practice as Moses instructed) and the latter should be recognised as ZAX.
References
Brother Nathanael vids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VajOaLaxfss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgmAHyYSg68
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdvxfuTA0PE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJt2MWYKXqY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmJNekA3qlo
This info on my blog
http://antibaal.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/the-curse-of-chiliasm.html
These jews see themselves as the only 'people' and see this world as their own.
You, me and all non jews are not people as far as they are concerned because the Talmud says so
Anyway.... Ive done a couple of clips on chiliasm myself and will add them as I finish them.
The curse of chiliasm - part 3
The curse of chiliasm - part 4
The curse of chiliasm - part 5
What is chiliasm? It is a jewish heresy that has become ingrained into Christianity, originally it was a prophecy regarding the endtimes. However as judaism is for jews only (by maternal bloodline) we can say that the prophecy was for jews only and only concerned the ancient Israelite world of the time. That prophecy came true in 70AD when the Romans destroyed the 2nd Temple in Jerusalem and destroyed the geneology records and that should be the end of the subject about that particular prophecy, but as we see it is reinfecting the dying body of Christianity much in the same way as HIV.
It is now being propagated by the likes of Zionist Apostate Xtians (I refuse to call these parasites Christian as there is nothing remotely Christian about them; I call them ZAX) as well as nutjob cults who are all headed by some loon who thinks he is Jesus and the followers regard them as such. It is also in the interests of the state of Israel and jewish zionists in general to ensure this propagation for political and financial ends instead of religious ones. Either by stupidity, gulliability or just plain corruption the ZAX have adopted this expired jewish heresy and seek to make it a current viable prophecy in Christianity, they propagate the idea that it is the purpose of Christians to serve the state of Israel, to serve zionism and to serve jews. ZAX seek to redefine Christianity from a faith that believes in Jesus Christ into one that serves jews, zionists and Israel (a type of unholy trinity really...) despite the fact that these three entities are largely atheist and that any spiritual aspect in them is pantheist. Modern judaism cannot be said to be an Abrahamic faith or a Mosaic faith as those who call themselves jews are not descendants of Abraham, Moses or even their tribes or even those of ancient Israel.
Todays jews are infact descendants of converts such as the askhenazim who are descendants of georgian and chechen converts, the same applies to sephardim who are descendants of Berber and Iberian converts. You also have various subsaharan africans claiming to be jews, as well as cochini (Indian) jews and even self proclaimed jews in China. These grubs are not semitic in the slightest but are just filth looking for easy money, a free trip to Israel, an Israeli passport and a springboard to Europe.
The only jews who have some claim to Israel are the Falashas and Musawis, the Falashas are Ethiopian jews who have a miniscule claim due to being descendants of the kingdom of the Queen of Sheba but the line of descendance is so remote that it no longer counts. The Musawi on the other hand are indeed recognised as having a right to live in Israel, but only by the Palestine Liberation Organisation charter that recognises them as Palestinians of the Judaist faith. However neither the jewish state of Israel nor ZAX recognises them as ethnic arabs who practice the judaist faith but instead has deemed them to be sephardic jews even though there is no bloodline connection. To claim that sephardic jews and Musawis are the same people is the same as saying Spanish and Italians are the same people because they look kinda similiar and use the same alphabet. As bigoted as this is, the ZAX will claim that it is a holy duty of all Christians to believe this because the jews said so (despite the fact they are not descendants of ancient Israelites or even believe in God, and if they do its not the same one everyone else believes in).
So let us examine the two key figures of ZAX chiliasm as well see it today (at this point I want to give credit to Brother Nathanael whose YouTube clips about zionist xtians are certainly worth watching), those two figures are John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Scofield. Their innane and opportunistic rantings are the backbone of ZAXism today which are being peddled by John Hagee.
John Nelson Darby
This guy started off in the Church of Ireland but later left to become involved in the Plymouth Brethren and from there he founded the Exclusive Brethren. His spin was his personal take on dispensationalism and futurism which is now held as 'the rapture' but pre-tribulation rapture theology was what he peddled with the Plymouth Brethren. His crankery increased with the invention of the telegraph which he saw as an invention of Cain and a harbinger of Armageddon and a definite sign that the end of the world was coming.
I'll just paste in this bit from the wikipedia page about Darby....
Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy.
So here we have Darby stating that for whatever reason that prophecy from the Old Testament regarding jews must be given priority because that is what God wants according to their (brethren) understanding. Is Darby saying that he and his stooges/captives know what God is going to do before God does? This sort of megalomania is quite evident when one examines the Exclusive Brethren.
At best this can be described as heresy or else it is better described as a personality cult which passes for xtian.
Cyrus Scofield
The author of the Scofield Reference Bible which is the indoctrination book of ZAX, although ZAX would like to portray Scofield as an enlightened progressive scholar the fact is the truth is quite opposite.
Cyrus Scofield was actually:
A drunk
A bigamist - he deserted his 1st wife and 2 children, the wife sued for divorce on grounds of desertion but Scofield actually remarried before the divorce was finalised.
And we have this as well from wikipedia....
In 1871, Scofield was elected to the Kansas House of Representatives, first from Atchison for one year and then from Nemaha County for a second. In 1873 he worked for the election of John J. Ingalls as senator from Kansas, and when Ingalls won, the new senator had Scofield appointed U. S. District Attorney for Kansas—at 29, the youngest in the country. Nevertheless, that same year Scofield was forced to resign "under a cloud of scandal" because of questionable financial transactions, that may have included accepting bribes from railroads, stealing political contributions intended for Ingalls, and securing bank promissory notes by forging signatures. It is possible Scofield was jailed on forgery charges, although there is no extant evidence in the public records.
If anything Cyrus Scofield was nothing more than a street hustler with expensive tastes and in fact both Darby and Scofield were lawyers by profession. They were just grubs looking to peddle their spin to jews and indeed anyone unfortunate enough to cross their paths. They are certainly not to be admired or respected. The sort of people they were can be seen today in the likes of John Hagee who is just another opportunist who likes the jetset lifestyle.
Now let us deal with the issue of Messianic Judaism, although people think of the term 'messianic jews' and simply think they are jews who have converted to Christianity this certainly isnt the case. If you convert to Christianity then that makes you a Christian and not a jew of some sort in relation to religious terms. Are there jews who have converted to Christianity? Yes and we see that with Brother Nathanael who identifies himself as an Orthodox Christian and not as a 'messianic jew' or any sort of jew.
Messianic Judaism is for jews only, they dont seek to recruit ZAX and at best ZAX might be regarded as associates or in reality just plain brown nosing stooges. One should look at the Messianic Judaism setup as a punk movement within Judaism, in it Jesus Christ isnt regarded as an aspect of God or having a God aspect; Rather he is a figurehead or totem like Sid Vicious was within the punk movement. Jesus Christ is respected by these jews not because of who and what he was but rather because he was a jew anti-hero who got the goyim to worship him as mainstream judaism aims to do for all jews in regards to the goyim (yes...thats non jews...in other words you and me). Messianic Judaism has remodelled Jesus Christ into some sort of punk Buddha. The ZAX are not in on the joke so they are the butt of it and indeed so is anyone else who falls for their spin.
So lets say a ZAX (or anybody else for that matter) wants to become a 'kosher christian'; How would they go about it?
Well first they would have to convert and be accepted into mainstream Judaism, they would have to study for 1-3 years. They would get instant acceptance depending on what they can do for zionism/global jewry (such as politicians, celebrities, etc), if they are poor or else bums they will be discouraged from trying to convert and told they can serve jewry by becoming or remaining a ZAX. If they do convert and do decide to become a Messianic Judaist then they will finally realise the joke but wont be able to do anything about it because they have invested so much time and money into this venture that they have alienated non jewish friends and face the real risk of leaving bankrupt.
They can only continue on in this new tribe in a cloud of self deceit much in the same way they were when they were ZAX. In my opinion this could explain the number of neurosies within the jewish community. I suppose this is always possible when one realises that ones history has been a lie.
Now one has to ask where mainstream modern judaism comes into this, well let us look at the situation. We have a group of people who call themselves jews who claim to be descendants of the ancient Israelites and anything that has to do with them.
But as we have things like DNA testing and the internet where there is a free flow of all sorts of information, we are seeing these ancient Israelite claims repeatedly challenged and increasingly refuted. The fact is that todays jews are not descendants of Abraham, Moses, or any ancient Israelites - they are descendants of converts and cannot call themselves 'the seed of Abraham' and they cannot call themselves 'Gods chosen people'.
With the overwhelming amount of jews who are either atheist or pantheist it cannot be said that they worship the God as worshiped by Abraham or Moses. What we have is not people who adjust themselves to comply to a religion but rather we have a religion which is being constantly remolded to comply to people. Todays judaism is not based on the Torah but instead is based on the Talmud, this is the same Talmud that condones pedophilia, calls non jews filth, calls the Virgin Mary a slut and says that Jesus Christ is in hell in a pool of boiling shit.
The fact is that judaism has had no prophets since the time of Jesus Christ, the only 'jews' who have attempted to convey prophecy on behalf of judaism are pagan converts and all they have done is inject vague prophecies from other religions into judaism to give the appearance of being the continuous line of Abraham, Moses and ancient Israel. An example of this is the issue of the AntiChrist in Christianity or the Dajjal of Islam, the jews came up with Armilus as their equivalent. But this has come after the prophecies of the AntiChrist/Dajjal despite the fact that these jews claim to be a direct line of descent from the ancient Israelites and have a continuous line of the gift of prophecy.
So where does chiliasm come into all this? Well considering that chiliasm is indeed an ancient Israelite prophecy and that it only applied to ancient Judaists and that the 'doomsday' aspect occurred in 70AD with the destruction of the 2nd Temple and destruction of the geneology records. But seeing as the jews had their Messiah - that being the Lord Jesus Christ crucified by the Romans, then the prophecy could not be fulfilled as it was recieved. So todays jews who are the descendants of pagan converts are now seeking to bring forth that prophecy to be fulfilled as it was recieved. And this is being percieved as certainly possible with events and circumstances as they are today.
With ZAX, messianic jews, the increase of atheism and various new age type pantheist thinking, the acceptance of anti-Christian type philosophies which require a religious devotion and a general tone of apathy as well; Then this 2nd shot at chiliasm may certainly be possible.
Overview
We seem to be dealing with a singular aspect on a multi-headed monster, whatever reasons the likes of 'christian zionism' or really better called 'Zionist Apostate Xtianity' was invented for its current purpose is to serve the zionist state of Israel and nothing else. I sometimes wonder and have to ask why these people dont join the likes of British Israelism, it seems that ZAX have a need to be servile. But all they actually achieve is being so vile, if they are not to be called ZAX then the appropriate word for them would be cucks. If there are no jews to serve under the name of atheist zionism then they would be willing slaves to the likes of the black American group called the Nation of Islam. These people hate themselves with pride in being debased, quite frankly these loathsome creatures are HIV to everything that is remotely European.
I'll just add this on:
1. There is a miniscule and dying minority of Judaists who do believe in the concept of God as was taught by Moses, these people should not refer to themselves as jews but rather as those who believe in the 'Mosaic faith'.
2. Musawis should be recognised for what they are - semitic Palestinians who believe in the Mosaic faith, they are not sephardim. The PLO charter of 1967 recognises them as such.
3. If Christian churches want to peddle the expired jewish prophecy of chiliasm then they should no longer be classified as Christian but instead must be referred to as chiliastic.
4. ZAX must be expelled from churches as they do engage in and propagate apostasy.
5. Judaism can no longer be accepted as an Abrahamic faith because it is overrun with atheists and pantheists.
6. There are physical (maternal bloodline) jews and there are 'spiritual' jews, the former should never be recognised as being of the Mosaic faith (unless they practice as Moses instructed) and the latter should be recognised as ZAX.
References
Brother Nathanael vids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VajOaLaxfss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgmAHyYSg68
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdvxfuTA0PE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJt2MWYKXqY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmJNekA3qlo
This info on my blog
http://antibaal.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/the-curse-of-chiliasm.html
These jews see themselves as the only 'people' and see this world as their own.
Anyway.... Ive done a couple of clips on chiliasm myself and will add them as I finish them.
The curse of chiliasm - part 1
The curse of chiliasm - part 2
The curse of chiliasm - part 3
The curse of chiliasm - part 4
The curse of chiliasm - part 5
Friday, 1 July 2016
The Last Pope: A useful idiot
Without any doubt this earth in this world has entered into a new era which cannot maintain the status quo. We see telltale signs with current events, its not just things such as terrorism or the doings of politicians and celebrities which are touted as priorities on the media. The continuous constant fracturings occuring in all aspects of life in our societies and subsocieties has produced a 'reality' without any absolutes, it is just as Hassan of Alamut said when nothing is true then all is permitted.
And thus it is, there are no absolute rights and wrongs or cases of true and false. Now there is just butchers and cattle, masters and slaves, the haves and the have nots. And the situation the 'winner' has to their advantage may only be temporal depending on who their allies are, this is the result of moral relativism. Corruption and gangsterism is now the order of the day and all are under its rule whether practical or titular, it affects the highest to the lowest in all fractured societies and all fractions within them. Atheism, maltheism, misotheism, hypocrisy and solipsism are now the acceptable religions because the Tree of Death has become completed, Tebhel and Cheled have been taken by the house of Satan, Malkuth in Assiah is now Lilith in Tohu.
Although people would like to see it in a matter of politics, economics and social networking because in doing so it maybe somewhat comprehended by them in order to survive within that system, the fact is that it is a matter of religion, faith and God. On top of that it is also a matter of dealing with the enemies of God, this is the Tree of Death where the virtues and vices of the Tree of Life has been reversed and are being applied. We see the results of this everyday, people would be able to understand this if not for the infiltration and sabotage of the religions and faiths which have been corrupted to the extent that has made its fanbase become practicing atheists. One might be tempted to call them apostates, but the only thing that prevents one from calling them that is the fact that they donot recognise the apostasy they practice.
There are many problems, there are many monsters in this picture. There are so many monsters who are motivated by so many differing desires that one cannot slay them in a single heroic effort, but there no dishonour in slaying them one at a time.
Which brings me to this monster, a useful idiot without concept of honour or dignity and whose only faith is stupidity and whose only creed is hypocrisy. His words and acts are a declaration of war against the only God, the only God as revealed by Abraham. His deeds and indeed every breath he takes are acts of war against Christianity and the belief in the Lord Jesus Christ. He is the personification of a human soul draining leech; His name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio otherwise known as Pope Francis.
I will just refer to him as Bergoglio as all the Popes before him were of a much finer calibre than he could ever possibly hope to be despite whatever flaws they had. With Bergoglio we are dealing with a moral relativist who will hold diametrically opposed views as being simultaneously true, he will preach a message in one country and then fly into another and preach the complete opposite. His vision of a wide church which can actually be said to be a one world church means that he has invited everyone and anyone in. He has consistantly negotiated the Roman Catholic faith and compromised its principles which we see in the way he has invited atheists into his fold, the results of which can be seen in his moral relativism. An example of this is where he has invited homosexuals into the church while supposedly adhering to traditional family values. Under Bergoglio the church has reportedly sought to increase the number of exorcists within its ranks and yet he never talks about occult matters and is quite content with redefining these issues in a secular context which can only be resolved in a secular context.
In doing so he can justify and implement his selective memory, by doing so he can avoid dealing with the prophecy of St. Malachy and his followers can avoid asking questions relating to this. The prophecy of St. Malachy is that from the time that St. Malachy recieved the prophecy that there would be 112 more Popes before the Catholic church fell and the 112th Pope would be the last Pope. The 112th Pope from the time of Malachy is Bergoglio and the acts, words, and hypocrisy of Bergoglio indicate that the prophecy is true and will be fulfilled. If he wants to repudiate this then he will have to declare St. Malachy a liar which then begs the question that if he was a liar then how did he become a saint? If Bergoglio were to declare that St. Malachy is a liar then the sainthood of all the saints would have to be reviewed. If it is declared that it is the line of succession that has been the cause of confusion regarding this matter then the issue regarding Cardinal Siri also known as Pope Gregory the XVII would also have to be reviewed. This specifically refers to the 1958 conclave in which Cardinal Siri was allegedly elected Pope after the death of Pope Pius XII.
Bergoglio seeks to invite all Christian churches to 'meld' into the Catholic faith, he is deemed to be the defacto head of the Catholic world and views non-Catholic churches to be merely rebels or having lost their way. He sees the way to do this is on political or corporate terms not on a spiritual basis, the Roman Catholic church is portrayed as the corporate office and the non Roman Catholic churches are portrayed as independant franchises who are operating as rogues and who need to be brought back to the fold and control of the head office. As it stands the independant churches that cannot be bought or forced to return to the fold would have to be declared different religions via technicallity, and to do this there has to be a greater claim of or else renouncement of the tenets of Christianity. One side has to redefine Christianity to such an extent that it can no longer be defined as Christian on a technical basis. We see now that the Roman Catholic church is subject to claims that it is no longer a Christian faith but rather one of Maryology due to what seems to be the veneration and worship of the Virgin Mary over that of the Lord Jesus Christ.
With Roman catholics now seeming more refering to Bergoglio as the 'holy father' and Bergoglio refering to the church as a feminine mother type entity we are seeing the Virgin Mary being seen as a personification of the Roman Catholic church and the Lord Jesus Christ is now deemed a 'child' of the church and Bergoglio is the father. What we are seeing is a reversal of order and any self proclaimed Christian church engaging in this sort of behaviour can no longer be called Christian because the Lord Jesus Christ is deemed to be subject to the authority of the Vatican or at least equal to it. As Bergoglio is declared the 'holy father', the church is declared by Bergoglio to be the feminine entity, as Jesus Christ is now 'just a man' and the Holy Spirit is seldom mentioned or else deemed to be an assistant of the church; Then the issue of God gets pushed out of any concern to what the actual church stands for, instead by default it seems the 'god' of the Vatican hierachy is a type of pantheism and not the God of the Lord Jesus Christ or any current or previous Bible prophet in either the New or Old Testaments. With the pantheism we can no longer say that the Roman Catholic churches that adhere to the direct word of Bergoglio are Christian. Bergoglio have written and published prayers which are held as perfect by his followers, in fact we are not seeing members of a Christian faith but fanatics of a personality cult.
If Bergoglio believes himself to be the highest entity of the Roman Catholic church (if not indeed all churches) then what are the positions of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary? On what basis are they to be worshipped and venerated? Are they declared to be higher and above the church? No, whatever their origins they are now the property of the church and this explains why Bergoglio and his ilk seek to take possession of non Roman Catholic churches. They and their members are deemed to be criminals not only because they wont submit to Bergoglio and the Vatican apparatchiks, but also because they are engaged in trademark and copyright violations.
But ultimately Bergoglio sees himself as the highest authority on this earth, you may ask how does he view other non Christian religions? Well my offhand opinion would be that he regards them as unattended business gone bad and this is why he seeks to draw them all in.... under his control. Although you might point the finger and say Bergoglio is a solipsist, myself I wouldnt go that far - at least not yet. If he did have a 'god on earth' complex he wouldnt feel the need to try and draw other religions in to absorb them or else be absorbed, it would be hard for him to find fault in those other religions when those other religions would easily find fault in the way that he leads the Roman Catholic church. They would point and say that his religion goes against the original teachings of Jesus Christ with things such as Maryology and the papacy which deems the Pope to be a proxy (if not overriding) authority for God on this earth, which is the exact description of what the Pope and Vatican claim that position to be... god on this earth.
Looking at the 2 other (kind of) Abrahamic faiths, those being Judaism and Islam; Bergoglio needs to find a serial unity in order to draw them in. He can no longer offer anything from a Christian perspective both in fact and to actually compromise, he has to redefine Jesus Christ in order to make him acceptable to both religions and yet make it as a unifying centrepiece.
Hence the Roman Catholic church can no longer call itself a Christian church but should call itself what it really is - a chiliastic church.
Chiliasm is Bergoglios' solution, with chiliasm Bergoglio can tell his cult captives to continue to worship Jesus and Mary.
He can tell the Jews that his cult worships Jesus and Mary not because of anything to do with God, but rather to them both being Jews. He can then tell the Muslims that the worship of Jesus and Mary in his cult is not really worship but a fetish because the Christ aspect of Jesus no longer has any bearing and thus at best he can only be a prophet. Mary is just being honoured for being the mother of Jesus and nothing else and if in doubt they should ask the Jews and the Jews will confirm this. It is a serial line of Judaism-Christianity-Islam, so officially nothing has changed, but technically these 3 'faiths' have been united under chiliasm. So as these 3 religions have separated from each other to the extent that it seems impossible to believe they came from a common ancestor, Bergoglio will be the hero of the hour doing everything he can to unite them. He will portray himself as the most unselfish person to ever walk the earth, he is so self sacrificing that he will even give up and end the papacy to do it. From that his name will be praised as the last Pope, as a Muslim saint and as a warrior for Tiqqun Olam. And people will pray to an undefined god in order to bless him.
Bergoglios' chiliasm can cater to everyone as it will certainly be accepted by xtian zionists, Jesus without the Christ aspect will be accepted by Buddhists and the fetish aspect will be accepted by Hindus and all schismatic sects from all global religions. It will be accepted by atheists with pronouncements that Jesus is just a man like everyone else, he will be everything to everyone but yet mean nothing to no one. Then the issue of UFOs and alien life can and probably will come into it and with Bergoglios' machinations he can make Jesus a key centrepoint of the various religions by using texts such as the Urantia book to justify his views on any current situation. He can claim that demons are just misunderstood aliens, claim that the chaos that results from the public appearance and interaction of demons/aliens with the global human public is just the tribulation and on top of that if any rapture were to occur he can just say that the disappeared people were taken by aliens to live with them on their own planets.
One might ask where does the concept of God come into all of this? And again the pantheist 'god' answers this, without any set absolute value this 'god' can cater to anyone in the manner that they wish to see it. To an atheist it will be the impersonal aspect of space, cycles and time, in the same way a Buddhist or Jain would percieve it. To everyone else it might be something that is personal to them and them alone, one could venture and say that this would lead to a mass solipsism and this would lead to an utter chaos. In such a world there could truly not be any judgment of right and wrong because how would such things be judged? No one could say that there is an absolute god in such a world because everyone would have a 1/7000000000th of a say in how this god would act and a singular absolute god in this context would be a contradiction of terms. The multitude of personal absolute truths being held as true while being diametrically opposed or at the very least just opposed to each other results in moral relativism and a case of 'whats true to you is true to you and whats true to me is true to me'. The end result of this will be nothing is true, all is permitted; Welcome to Lilith in Tohu.
We have to ask the reasons that would motivate someone like Bergoglio to gamble everything for one chance for what?
A world unifying religion? You have the likes of the Bahais unifying all faiths because their tenets can be expandable to adjust for these faiths and they dont have dogma per se. The Roman Catholic faith is riddled with dogma and seemingly none of it is to do with purely spiritual matters but rather to do with governance of the church, the clergy and the congregations.
If the church would invite questions from non catholics to clarify and answer them, then in theory all faiths would find they have more in common than what opportunist spokesmen from those faith are telling their members. But the vatican is its own nation and it can never be questioned and certainly not compelled to answer all questions but maybe a select few. In fact Bergoglio doesnt actually issue press releases but instead this is the dominion of the vatican press office, and yet another question is if Bergoglio is the head of the vatican state then on what authority or indeed non authority does the vatican press office issue press releases on his personal behalf? And why do they do it?
Is it a matter of official protocol or is it something else? Examining what Bergoglio has said and continues to say at differing times, saying things that are contradictory and yet held as being simultaneously true one has to question the mental faculties of Bergoglio as they should be done to any head of state or any head of religion whether they be practical or titular. I've come up with the following possibilities:
1. These are just his personal idiosyncracies and in no way reflect his mental state
2. He is displaying the symptoms of senility/alzheimers/dementia
3. He has a mental illness of some sort
4. He has a physical condition which requires him to use narcotics which reflects in his actions
5. He is just a body being used by various demons in a routine based on planetary and/or zodiacal hours
6. He is just an arsehole
I have never met or examined any medical records pertaining to Bergoglio so I wont make any judgment or pronounciation on his current state. All I will do is comment on the points:
1. Quite possible
2. Another possibility but he does seem to be able to function enough to do public appearances and meet with other heads of state. But we can only observe what the media cares to make public
3. Again possible but this would most likely have been a lifelong condition and would have prevented him from being considered for the position of pope
4. Again possible
5. Again possible as his persona seems to change with his contradictory announcements
6. Again possible
I think what would be more telling in relation to these points would be the knowledge of his assistants, what they do and who they are.
And thus it is, there are no absolute rights and wrongs or cases of true and false. Now there is just butchers and cattle, masters and slaves, the haves and the have nots. And the situation the 'winner' has to their advantage may only be temporal depending on who their allies are, this is the result of moral relativism. Corruption and gangsterism is now the order of the day and all are under its rule whether practical or titular, it affects the highest to the lowest in all fractured societies and all fractions within them. Atheism, maltheism, misotheism, hypocrisy and solipsism are now the acceptable religions because the Tree of Death has become completed, Tebhel and Cheled have been taken by the house of Satan, Malkuth in Assiah is now Lilith in Tohu.
Although people would like to see it in a matter of politics, economics and social networking because in doing so it maybe somewhat comprehended by them in order to survive within that system, the fact is that it is a matter of religion, faith and God. On top of that it is also a matter of dealing with the enemies of God, this is the Tree of Death where the virtues and vices of the Tree of Life has been reversed and are being applied. We see the results of this everyday, people would be able to understand this if not for the infiltration and sabotage of the religions and faiths which have been corrupted to the extent that has made its fanbase become practicing atheists. One might be tempted to call them apostates, but the only thing that prevents one from calling them that is the fact that they donot recognise the apostasy they practice.
There are many problems, there are many monsters in this picture. There are so many monsters who are motivated by so many differing desires that one cannot slay them in a single heroic effort, but there no dishonour in slaying them one at a time.
Which brings me to this monster, a useful idiot without concept of honour or dignity and whose only faith is stupidity and whose only creed is hypocrisy. His words and acts are a declaration of war against the only God, the only God as revealed by Abraham. His deeds and indeed every breath he takes are acts of war against Christianity and the belief in the Lord Jesus Christ. He is the personification of a human soul draining leech; His name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio otherwise known as Pope Francis.
I will just refer to him as Bergoglio as all the Popes before him were of a much finer calibre than he could ever possibly hope to be despite whatever flaws they had. With Bergoglio we are dealing with a moral relativist who will hold diametrically opposed views as being simultaneously true, he will preach a message in one country and then fly into another and preach the complete opposite. His vision of a wide church which can actually be said to be a one world church means that he has invited everyone and anyone in. He has consistantly negotiated the Roman Catholic faith and compromised its principles which we see in the way he has invited atheists into his fold, the results of which can be seen in his moral relativism. An example of this is where he has invited homosexuals into the church while supposedly adhering to traditional family values. Under Bergoglio the church has reportedly sought to increase the number of exorcists within its ranks and yet he never talks about occult matters and is quite content with redefining these issues in a secular context which can only be resolved in a secular context.
In doing so he can justify and implement his selective memory, by doing so he can avoid dealing with the prophecy of St. Malachy and his followers can avoid asking questions relating to this. The prophecy of St. Malachy is that from the time that St. Malachy recieved the prophecy that there would be 112 more Popes before the Catholic church fell and the 112th Pope would be the last Pope. The 112th Pope from the time of Malachy is Bergoglio and the acts, words, and hypocrisy of Bergoglio indicate that the prophecy is true and will be fulfilled. If he wants to repudiate this then he will have to declare St. Malachy a liar which then begs the question that if he was a liar then how did he become a saint? If Bergoglio were to declare that St. Malachy is a liar then the sainthood of all the saints would have to be reviewed. If it is declared that it is the line of succession that has been the cause of confusion regarding this matter then the issue regarding Cardinal Siri also known as Pope Gregory the XVII would also have to be reviewed. This specifically refers to the 1958 conclave in which Cardinal Siri was allegedly elected Pope after the death of Pope Pius XII.
Bergoglio seeks to invite all Christian churches to 'meld' into the Catholic faith, he is deemed to be the defacto head of the Catholic world and views non-Catholic churches to be merely rebels or having lost their way. He sees the way to do this is on political or corporate terms not on a spiritual basis, the Roman Catholic church is portrayed as the corporate office and the non Roman Catholic churches are portrayed as independant franchises who are operating as rogues and who need to be brought back to the fold and control of the head office. As it stands the independant churches that cannot be bought or forced to return to the fold would have to be declared different religions via technicallity, and to do this there has to be a greater claim of or else renouncement of the tenets of Christianity. One side has to redefine Christianity to such an extent that it can no longer be defined as Christian on a technical basis. We see now that the Roman Catholic church is subject to claims that it is no longer a Christian faith but rather one of Maryology due to what seems to be the veneration and worship of the Virgin Mary over that of the Lord Jesus Christ.
With Roman catholics now seeming more refering to Bergoglio as the 'holy father' and Bergoglio refering to the church as a feminine mother type entity we are seeing the Virgin Mary being seen as a personification of the Roman Catholic church and the Lord Jesus Christ is now deemed a 'child' of the church and Bergoglio is the father. What we are seeing is a reversal of order and any self proclaimed Christian church engaging in this sort of behaviour can no longer be called Christian because the Lord Jesus Christ is deemed to be subject to the authority of the Vatican or at least equal to it. As Bergoglio is declared the 'holy father', the church is declared by Bergoglio to be the feminine entity, as Jesus Christ is now 'just a man' and the Holy Spirit is seldom mentioned or else deemed to be an assistant of the church; Then the issue of God gets pushed out of any concern to what the actual church stands for, instead by default it seems the 'god' of the Vatican hierachy is a type of pantheism and not the God of the Lord Jesus Christ or any current or previous Bible prophet in either the New or Old Testaments. With the pantheism we can no longer say that the Roman Catholic churches that adhere to the direct word of Bergoglio are Christian. Bergoglio have written and published prayers which are held as perfect by his followers, in fact we are not seeing members of a Christian faith but fanatics of a personality cult.
If Bergoglio believes himself to be the highest entity of the Roman Catholic church (if not indeed all churches) then what are the positions of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary? On what basis are they to be worshipped and venerated? Are they declared to be higher and above the church? No, whatever their origins they are now the property of the church and this explains why Bergoglio and his ilk seek to take possession of non Roman Catholic churches. They and their members are deemed to be criminals not only because they wont submit to Bergoglio and the Vatican apparatchiks, but also because they are engaged in trademark and copyright violations.
But ultimately Bergoglio sees himself as the highest authority on this earth, you may ask how does he view other non Christian religions? Well my offhand opinion would be that he regards them as unattended business gone bad and this is why he seeks to draw them all in.... under his control. Although you might point the finger and say Bergoglio is a solipsist, myself I wouldnt go that far - at least not yet. If he did have a 'god on earth' complex he wouldnt feel the need to try and draw other religions in to absorb them or else be absorbed, it would be hard for him to find fault in those other religions when those other religions would easily find fault in the way that he leads the Roman Catholic church. They would point and say that his religion goes against the original teachings of Jesus Christ with things such as Maryology and the papacy which deems the Pope to be a proxy (if not overriding) authority for God on this earth, which is the exact description of what the Pope and Vatican claim that position to be... god on this earth.
Looking at the 2 other (kind of) Abrahamic faiths, those being Judaism and Islam; Bergoglio needs to find a serial unity in order to draw them in. He can no longer offer anything from a Christian perspective both in fact and to actually compromise, he has to redefine Jesus Christ in order to make him acceptable to both religions and yet make it as a unifying centrepiece.
Hence the Roman Catholic church can no longer call itself a Christian church but should call itself what it really is - a chiliastic church.
Chiliasm is Bergoglios' solution, with chiliasm Bergoglio can tell his cult captives to continue to worship Jesus and Mary.
He can tell the Jews that his cult worships Jesus and Mary not because of anything to do with God, but rather to them both being Jews. He can then tell the Muslims that the worship of Jesus and Mary in his cult is not really worship but a fetish because the Christ aspect of Jesus no longer has any bearing and thus at best he can only be a prophet. Mary is just being honoured for being the mother of Jesus and nothing else and if in doubt they should ask the Jews and the Jews will confirm this. It is a serial line of Judaism-Christianity-Islam, so officially nothing has changed, but technically these 3 'faiths' have been united under chiliasm. So as these 3 religions have separated from each other to the extent that it seems impossible to believe they came from a common ancestor, Bergoglio will be the hero of the hour doing everything he can to unite them. He will portray himself as the most unselfish person to ever walk the earth, he is so self sacrificing that he will even give up and end the papacy to do it. From that his name will be praised as the last Pope, as a Muslim saint and as a warrior for Tiqqun Olam. And people will pray to an undefined god in order to bless him.
Bergoglios' chiliasm can cater to everyone as it will certainly be accepted by xtian zionists, Jesus without the Christ aspect will be accepted by Buddhists and the fetish aspect will be accepted by Hindus and all schismatic sects from all global religions. It will be accepted by atheists with pronouncements that Jesus is just a man like everyone else, he will be everything to everyone but yet mean nothing to no one. Then the issue of UFOs and alien life can and probably will come into it and with Bergoglios' machinations he can make Jesus a key centrepoint of the various religions by using texts such as the Urantia book to justify his views on any current situation. He can claim that demons are just misunderstood aliens, claim that the chaos that results from the public appearance and interaction of demons/aliens with the global human public is just the tribulation and on top of that if any rapture were to occur he can just say that the disappeared people were taken by aliens to live with them on their own planets.
One might ask where does the concept of God come into all of this? And again the pantheist 'god' answers this, without any set absolute value this 'god' can cater to anyone in the manner that they wish to see it. To an atheist it will be the impersonal aspect of space, cycles and time, in the same way a Buddhist or Jain would percieve it. To everyone else it might be something that is personal to them and them alone, one could venture and say that this would lead to a mass solipsism and this would lead to an utter chaos. In such a world there could truly not be any judgment of right and wrong because how would such things be judged? No one could say that there is an absolute god in such a world because everyone would have a 1/7000000000th of a say in how this god would act and a singular absolute god in this context would be a contradiction of terms. The multitude of personal absolute truths being held as true while being diametrically opposed or at the very least just opposed to each other results in moral relativism and a case of 'whats true to you is true to you and whats true to me is true to me'. The end result of this will be nothing is true, all is permitted; Welcome to Lilith in Tohu.
We have to ask the reasons that would motivate someone like Bergoglio to gamble everything for one chance for what?
A world unifying religion? You have the likes of the Bahais unifying all faiths because their tenets can be expandable to adjust for these faiths and they dont have dogma per se. The Roman Catholic faith is riddled with dogma and seemingly none of it is to do with purely spiritual matters but rather to do with governance of the church, the clergy and the congregations.
If the church would invite questions from non catholics to clarify and answer them, then in theory all faiths would find they have more in common than what opportunist spokesmen from those faith are telling their members. But the vatican is its own nation and it can never be questioned and certainly not compelled to answer all questions but maybe a select few. In fact Bergoglio doesnt actually issue press releases but instead this is the dominion of the vatican press office, and yet another question is if Bergoglio is the head of the vatican state then on what authority or indeed non authority does the vatican press office issue press releases on his personal behalf? And why do they do it?
Is it a matter of official protocol or is it something else? Examining what Bergoglio has said and continues to say at differing times, saying things that are contradictory and yet held as being simultaneously true one has to question the mental faculties of Bergoglio as they should be done to any head of state or any head of religion whether they be practical or titular. I've come up with the following possibilities:
1. These are just his personal idiosyncracies and in no way reflect his mental state
2. He is displaying the symptoms of senility/alzheimers/dementia
3. He has a mental illness of some sort
4. He has a physical condition which requires him to use narcotics which reflects in his actions
5. He is just a body being used by various demons in a routine based on planetary and/or zodiacal hours
6. He is just an arsehole
I have never met or examined any medical records pertaining to Bergoglio so I wont make any judgment or pronounciation on his current state. All I will do is comment on the points:
1. Quite possible
2. Another possibility but he does seem to be able to function enough to do public appearances and meet with other heads of state. But we can only observe what the media cares to make public
3. Again possible but this would most likely have been a lifelong condition and would have prevented him from being considered for the position of pope
4. Again possible
5. Again possible as his persona seems to change with his contradictory announcements
6. Again possible
I think what would be more telling in relation to these points would be the knowledge of his assistants, what they do and who they are.
Thursday, 8 January 2015
Political correctness and cucks
I noted a Brother Nathaniel vid where he says that christian zionist churches do not have crucifixes on them or within their grounds. I have noticed this too, there is an increasing number of churches who seem to not have any.
Why? I dont know, but it seems to be along the lines of political correctness. Is it being done so as not to offend muslims? Possibly, but if the idea is not to offend muslims by removing crosses and by doing this the muslims will come to the church, then this is ridiculous.
Why would muslims convert to a religion that removes the symbol of the central part of their faith? Why would you sign up to a cowardly faith for? You have 'christian apologetics' but what are they actually apologising for? While some muslims are chronic complainers but not all, the chronic complainers are always backed up by white marxists who are by default atheist. It is marxism that is the driving force behind the removal of crucifixes from churches and the watering down of faith and the redefining of tenets. And marxism by default is the holding of atheist whites and atheist jews.
But in the end the connection is obvious as marxism and zionism were founded by atheist jews.
Why? I dont know, but it seems to be along the lines of political correctness. Is it being done so as not to offend muslims? Possibly, but if the idea is not to offend muslims by removing crosses and by doing this the muslims will come to the church, then this is ridiculous.
Why would muslims convert to a religion that removes the symbol of the central part of their faith? Why would you sign up to a cowardly faith for? You have 'christian apologetics' but what are they actually apologising for? While some muslims are chronic complainers but not all, the chronic complainers are always backed up by white marxists who are by default atheist. It is marxism that is the driving force behind the removal of crucifixes from churches and the watering down of faith and the redefining of tenets. And marxism by default is the holding of atheist whites and atheist jews.
But in the end the connection is obvious as marxism and zionism were founded by atheist jews.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)