Sunday, 14 June 2020
Saturday, 13 June 2020
My argument to prove God exists (I)
I am starting a series to show proof that God exists, although there may be many examples of cases on the internet to show proof or at least a just cause to believe there is a God I am looking beyond the usual philosophical realm. So what I will be doing is taking a look at all factors, factoring in probabilities much in the same way as gambling odds etc. Once I cannot continue further (or simply run out of ideas) I will place all that I have come up with on a MS Word document or PDF for you to download and hopefully inspire you to type down your concepts to display for others.
And hopefully we can cure atheism which is the most horrid, evil mental illness known to mankind.
Praise be upon the only God whose unity is one by all without exception. Amen
The Argument From Anthropology
(this is probably not strictly anthropology in relation to the accepted purely scientific understanding)
Although with society today we see the likes of identity politics, in that people will categorise themselves into categories not of their own choosing or creation. But rather that of the political and social establishments of the day which are not concrete, but rather temporary. They do this to be politically correct and socially compliant even though they may not personally approve of the groupthink or hivemind of these categories and their actions.
It is fair to say that all humans have a complex and individual personality, but it would be absurd to say that such a complexity could have emerged from nothing and with no cause. The atheist would claim that personalities are formed through environment, circumstances, experience and DNA, but if that was truly the complete case then personalities could be manufactured according to the states' needs and wants. And if that was the case would the individual personality simply approve of its use by the state and be in full agreeance with it? If the answer uniformly is "yes" then we are seeing slavery and moral relativism as factors. While we cannot erase the factor of fear in relation to politics (of violence and other physical harm) or social (abandonment and isolation) realms, the reality is that moral relativism cannot be enforced. Yes you can force people to obey, but you cannot force them to approve.
Whether they are bribed or whether they are terrorised they will mostly hold the same opinion, there is an individuality within them that is not a result of mental and physical circumstances, but spiritual. Whether you wish to call that factor spirit or soul it is not self made and the only reasonably logical explanation to me is that it is the result of a higher entity. Some may say that our individuality is a result of our parents along with environment, circumstances and experience but if that was the case we would be clones of our parents and indeed to an extent everyone else in our society. And indeed it would be the groupthink/hivemind society which would be continuously replicating because everyone would be predisposed to replicate their parents. There would have been no great thinkers or doers because the level of education or free thought would have never risen. Nor would the level of aspiration or even imagination, people would still believe the Earth is flat (if they had the concept of a planet) and the inventions we take for granted in modern life would never have been invented.
If the atheists and evolutionists had their way we would be still living in caves...but under their control. In fact we would be little better than baboons and feral dogs.
As we have seen in history (and indeed today) people can be compelled to act against their own beliefs, opinions, and wishes due to physical acts (whether it be of bribery or terror) but control of ones' thoughts as an individual being can never be enforced or known to be enforced. But we are seeing attempts at that with various pharmaceuticals and police looking for "thought crime". It is not the individuals' belief that is being curtailed but rather their ability to act on their individual belief.
It can be said that the human personality (that being the result of spiritual, mental and physical factors) would need to be made by an entity or being with the same and actually greater, complex personality which would have factored in autonomy. As we are created in the image of God and have the ability to aspire we would have to look at examples of a 'greater whole' of the personality of God that we can comprehend.
An example can be found on the 'Tree of Life' which gives us 10 aspects of God, there are 10 sections (or sephiroth) and each individual section is overlooked by an aspect of God. The reference to the Tree of Life can be found in Kabbalah teachings, and there are four worlds regarding the Tree of Life in the Kabbalah
They are;
Atziluth (Emanation)
Briah (Creation)
Yetzirah (Formation)
Assiah (the world of action, what we refer to as the physical)
But Assiah has Tebhel (Immanent) and Cheled (Transcendental)
There is no doubt that we are born with unique personalities, though we may have them altered or changed by the likes of environment and the people we associate with. Or else things such as mental illness, drug addiction and even peer pressure or coercion. The fact is we are born with a unique personality which existed before we were exposed to various elements which we may of interacted with. The uniqueness of the personality comes from our soul, regardless of our external appearance we will hold true what we 'feel is right' or else what our 'gut instinct' says. We all hold some thought of intuition but whether we enact on it or not is another matter depending on circumstance, but circumstances regarding our physical and mental factors can be altered.
The circumstances of spiritual factors regarding our soul cannot, even if you look at atheism you will see people hating God. The atheist will proclaim that God does not exist and yet have a hatred for this great being, this can be only said and seen in a personal relationship. To hate God makes as much sense as hating Mickey Mouse.
And yet atheists will accept Mickey Mouse as an animate being because to them Mickey Mouse can exist in psychological, aesthetical, emotional and even physical (like some guy in Disneyland dressed up in an outfit, although it cannot be THE Mickey Mouse it is a suitable proxy). But all these facets of Mickey Mouse can only be symbolic, this is because these facets do not come from or are even created by a single independant animated entity. If you examine it, the existance of Mickey Mouse came into being through the emanation, creation, and formation in the mind of Walt Disney before it 'came' into the physical realm. You also have to factor in consultants and staff who helped fine tune the final but yet evolving product.
You might argue that the existance of God came about through a simular measure, to that I would say that the existance of religion and denominations can be said to have come about through similar measures. But you cannot forget about the consultants and staff required to propagate and 'sell' the religion or denomination. A church without clergy and parishioners could not open, but a church without the support staff (whether paid or voluntary) could not survive. There would be no one to help or aid the clergy, parishioners, or maintain the church and its grounds. A belief in the existance of and in God does not require actors or an audience or stagehands or even a theatre. It does not require these things because God is infinitely greater than mankind and its inventions (whether they are psychological, aesthetical, emotional or physical).
Mankind may have a concept of something, it may visualise how that concept may look like, and it may even draw up plans on how this concept will come into the physical realm. But the reality is that these plans fail or distort from the original concept. Essentially they are plans from other plans which were from other plans. Mankind cannot create nature, yes it may corrupt, distort, imitate and re-invent nature but it cannot create nature. Mankind has yet to create a new species with an amount of chromosomes that no other species has, this shows that only a greater entity could have brought the concept of the universe into physical reality. A greater entity with greater intelligence and greater experience. Even if all the thinking abilities and intelligence of all humans were to be collectively contained within a single brain, mankind would be no better off than it is today.
Unless mankind realises that itself is a creation, indeed a self replicating creation like other mammals then it will ignore the very thing that differentiates us from the other mammals besides our physical attributes. And that thing is our soul, if we had no soul then we all would be sociopaths. And if that was the case then you and I would not be here as history would have gone extinct and disappeared some time ago.
Existance does have an "order of things" and we can see this in nature, it is mankind that is increasingly collectively seeking to alter this. In fact what we are seeing today is the collective attempt to install a new collective 'god' under the title of "humanity" and applying labels to its methods such as 'evolution' and 'progress'. But words like 'evolution' and 'progress' have been redefined into different contexts much like the word 'racism'. What is written in an English language dictionary may not be the same as taught in a university because the context has changed, their definitions may come from a political dictionary or a psychological dictionary and even then the definitions may be differing in each subject due to the vested interests. Much like the different denominations in the various religions will push their own specific beliefs, if these beliefs were not so separately specific then there would be no need for separate denominations.
A demonstration is the word "transsexual", what is its definition? Is it someone who "identifies" as the opposite gender? Is it someone who has had surgery to 'be as' the opposite gender? Or is it something different? People can make as many lofty pronouncements and definitions as they want, but at the end of the day you cannot change your sex/gender. You can have surgery, hormones and various forms of 'counseling' to help you identify as the opposite gender, but if a clone was made from your DNA it would be the same gender as you were born. In the same way that whatever lifestyle you choose to live or else are caught up in, you will have a sense of right and wrong that cannot be altered.
However that does not mean that 'mankind' will not try to 're-invent' itself, but this is not actually the case. When people scream and wail "for humanity!!!" they are only reflecting an extreme minority of human beings at any given time. As for 're-inventing'? You can only re-invent what you, yourself have actually invented. That is everything from concept to physical reality, everything from emanation to creation to formation to physical action (whether it be producing a product or implementing a method). It is easier to redefine language than to re-invent that of the physical, and that is what we are seeing today. We have no right and wrong, instead we have moral relativism which is not about "the greater good of humanity" but rather a comfort blanket for solipsists.
People whether they be of various racial groupings, ethnicities, or bloodlines will be judged to be civilised, uncivilised, or 'evolving'. However this is not likely to be a judgment based on their intelligence but rather their material gain, a city full of skyscrapers will be deemed to be more civilised than a village full of huts. Even though the city will be overpopulated, have high levels of crime and suicide in addition to isolation with the mandatory loneliness. The city will be deemed more successful and more civilised than the village, but it is the village from which the basis of civilisation came from. In regards to religion the more people that are adherants of that religion, the more prone that religion is to dissent, apostasy, fragmentation and splintering. In relation to God the best mindset is K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid), short, sharp answers will give people something understandable to work with as they begin their own quest or own research. I started this project to present an argument that there is a God. I do not care about how many aspects it has, how many people view God or don't view it. I suppose one of my main motivations to write this are the repeated worn out arguments used by those faithful to God in the hope of converting others to their particular faith.
To that I say:
No.1 - You are serving God, not your sect.
No.2 - Don't do something because others are doing it. I especially see this among Christians handing out CHICK Tracts on the street, don't bother because everybody has seen then, they convince no one because they are the sort of comics written for 5 year olds and you come across as arrogant because it makes it look like you think everyone is as stupid as you.
You can do better than this, did God give you a brain? THEN USE IT!
*i think im done with anthropology*
And hopefully we can cure atheism which is the most horrid, evil mental illness known to mankind.
Praise be upon the only God whose unity is one by all without exception. Amen
The Argument From Anthropology
(this is probably not strictly anthropology in relation to the accepted purely scientific understanding)
Although with society today we see the likes of identity politics, in that people will categorise themselves into categories not of their own choosing or creation. But rather that of the political and social establishments of the day which are not concrete, but rather temporary. They do this to be politically correct and socially compliant even though they may not personally approve of the groupthink or hivemind of these categories and their actions.
It is fair to say that all humans have a complex and individual personality, but it would be absurd to say that such a complexity could have emerged from nothing and with no cause. The atheist would claim that personalities are formed through environment, circumstances, experience and DNA, but if that was truly the complete case then personalities could be manufactured according to the states' needs and wants. And if that was the case would the individual personality simply approve of its use by the state and be in full agreeance with it? If the answer uniformly is "yes" then we are seeing slavery and moral relativism as factors. While we cannot erase the factor of fear in relation to politics (of violence and other physical harm) or social (abandonment and isolation) realms, the reality is that moral relativism cannot be enforced. Yes you can force people to obey, but you cannot force them to approve.
Whether they are bribed or whether they are terrorised they will mostly hold the same opinion, there is an individuality within them that is not a result of mental and physical circumstances, but spiritual. Whether you wish to call that factor spirit or soul it is not self made and the only reasonably logical explanation to me is that it is the result of a higher entity. Some may say that our individuality is a result of our parents along with environment, circumstances and experience but if that was the case we would be clones of our parents and indeed to an extent everyone else in our society. And indeed it would be the groupthink/hivemind society which would be continuously replicating because everyone would be predisposed to replicate their parents. There would have been no great thinkers or doers because the level of education or free thought would have never risen. Nor would the level of aspiration or even imagination, people would still believe the Earth is flat (if they had the concept of a planet) and the inventions we take for granted in modern life would never have been invented.
If the atheists and evolutionists had their way we would be still living in caves...but under their control. In fact we would be little better than baboons and feral dogs.
As we have seen in history (and indeed today) people can be compelled to act against their own beliefs, opinions, and wishes due to physical acts (whether it be of bribery or terror) but control of ones' thoughts as an individual being can never be enforced or known to be enforced. But we are seeing attempts at that with various pharmaceuticals and police looking for "thought crime". It is not the individuals' belief that is being curtailed but rather their ability to act on their individual belief.
It can be said that the human personality (that being the result of spiritual, mental and physical factors) would need to be made by an entity or being with the same and actually greater, complex personality which would have factored in autonomy. As we are created in the image of God and have the ability to aspire we would have to look at examples of a 'greater whole' of the personality of God that we can comprehend.
An example can be found on the 'Tree of Life' which gives us 10 aspects of God, there are 10 sections (or sephiroth) and each individual section is overlooked by an aspect of God. The reference to the Tree of Life can be found in Kabbalah teachings, and there are four worlds regarding the Tree of Life in the Kabbalah
They are;
Atziluth (Emanation)
Briah (Creation)
Yetzirah (Formation)
Assiah (the world of action, what we refer to as the physical)
But Assiah has Tebhel (Immanent) and Cheled (Transcendental)
There is no doubt that we are born with unique personalities, though we may have them altered or changed by the likes of environment and the people we associate with. Or else things such as mental illness, drug addiction and even peer pressure or coercion. The fact is we are born with a unique personality which existed before we were exposed to various elements which we may of interacted with. The uniqueness of the personality comes from our soul, regardless of our external appearance we will hold true what we 'feel is right' or else what our 'gut instinct' says. We all hold some thought of intuition but whether we enact on it or not is another matter depending on circumstance, but circumstances regarding our physical and mental factors can be altered.
The circumstances of spiritual factors regarding our soul cannot, even if you look at atheism you will see people hating God. The atheist will proclaim that God does not exist and yet have a hatred for this great being, this can be only said and seen in a personal relationship. To hate God makes as much sense as hating Mickey Mouse.
And yet atheists will accept Mickey Mouse as an animate being because to them Mickey Mouse can exist in psychological, aesthetical, emotional and even physical (like some guy in Disneyland dressed up in an outfit, although it cannot be THE Mickey Mouse it is a suitable proxy). But all these facets of Mickey Mouse can only be symbolic, this is because these facets do not come from or are even created by a single independant animated entity. If you examine it, the existance of Mickey Mouse came into being through the emanation, creation, and formation in the mind of Walt Disney before it 'came' into the physical realm. You also have to factor in consultants and staff who helped fine tune the final but yet evolving product.
You might argue that the existance of God came about through a simular measure, to that I would say that the existance of religion and denominations can be said to have come about through similar measures. But you cannot forget about the consultants and staff required to propagate and 'sell' the religion or denomination. A church without clergy and parishioners could not open, but a church without the support staff (whether paid or voluntary) could not survive. There would be no one to help or aid the clergy, parishioners, or maintain the church and its grounds. A belief in the existance of and in God does not require actors or an audience or stagehands or even a theatre. It does not require these things because God is infinitely greater than mankind and its inventions (whether they are psychological, aesthetical, emotional or physical).
Mankind may have a concept of something, it may visualise how that concept may look like, and it may even draw up plans on how this concept will come into the physical realm. But the reality is that these plans fail or distort from the original concept. Essentially they are plans from other plans which were from other plans. Mankind cannot create nature, yes it may corrupt, distort, imitate and re-invent nature but it cannot create nature. Mankind has yet to create a new species with an amount of chromosomes that no other species has, this shows that only a greater entity could have brought the concept of the universe into physical reality. A greater entity with greater intelligence and greater experience. Even if all the thinking abilities and intelligence of all humans were to be collectively contained within a single brain, mankind would be no better off than it is today.
Unless mankind realises that itself is a creation, indeed a self replicating creation like other mammals then it will ignore the very thing that differentiates us from the other mammals besides our physical attributes. And that thing is our soul, if we had no soul then we all would be sociopaths. And if that was the case then you and I would not be here as history would have gone extinct and disappeared some time ago.
Existance does have an "order of things" and we can see this in nature, it is mankind that is increasingly collectively seeking to alter this. In fact what we are seeing today is the collective attempt to install a new collective 'god' under the title of "humanity" and applying labels to its methods such as 'evolution' and 'progress'. But words like 'evolution' and 'progress' have been redefined into different contexts much like the word 'racism'. What is written in an English language dictionary may not be the same as taught in a university because the context has changed, their definitions may come from a political dictionary or a psychological dictionary and even then the definitions may be differing in each subject due to the vested interests. Much like the different denominations in the various religions will push their own specific beliefs, if these beliefs were not so separately specific then there would be no need for separate denominations.
A demonstration is the word "transsexual", what is its definition? Is it someone who "identifies" as the opposite gender? Is it someone who has had surgery to 'be as' the opposite gender? Or is it something different? People can make as many lofty pronouncements and definitions as they want, but at the end of the day you cannot change your sex/gender. You can have surgery, hormones and various forms of 'counseling' to help you identify as the opposite gender, but if a clone was made from your DNA it would be the same gender as you were born. In the same way that whatever lifestyle you choose to live or else are caught up in, you will have a sense of right and wrong that cannot be altered.
However that does not mean that 'mankind' will not try to 're-invent' itself, but this is not actually the case. When people scream and wail "for humanity!!!" they are only reflecting an extreme minority of human beings at any given time. As for 're-inventing'? You can only re-invent what you, yourself have actually invented. That is everything from concept to physical reality, everything from emanation to creation to formation to physical action (whether it be producing a product or implementing a method). It is easier to redefine language than to re-invent that of the physical, and that is what we are seeing today. We have no right and wrong, instead we have moral relativism which is not about "the greater good of humanity" but rather a comfort blanket for solipsists.
People whether they be of various racial groupings, ethnicities, or bloodlines will be judged to be civilised, uncivilised, or 'evolving'. However this is not likely to be a judgment based on their intelligence but rather their material gain, a city full of skyscrapers will be deemed to be more civilised than a village full of huts. Even though the city will be overpopulated, have high levels of crime and suicide in addition to isolation with the mandatory loneliness. The city will be deemed more successful and more civilised than the village, but it is the village from which the basis of civilisation came from. In regards to religion the more people that are adherants of that religion, the more prone that religion is to dissent, apostasy, fragmentation and splintering. In relation to God the best mindset is K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid), short, sharp answers will give people something understandable to work with as they begin their own quest or own research. I started this project to present an argument that there is a God. I do not care about how many aspects it has, how many people view God or don't view it. I suppose one of my main motivations to write this are the repeated worn out arguments used by those faithful to God in the hope of converting others to their particular faith.
To that I say:
No.1 - You are serving God, not your sect.
No.2 - Don't do something because others are doing it. I especially see this among Christians handing out CHICK Tracts on the street, don't bother because everybody has seen then, they convince no one because they are the sort of comics written for 5 year olds and you come across as arrogant because it makes it look like you think everyone is as stupid as you.
You can do better than this, did God give you a brain? THEN USE IT!
*i think im done with anthropology*
|
Friday, 12 June 2020
Tuesday, 9 June 2020
My video on COVID-19
I stand by what I say, Australia and especially the state of New South Wales are essentially police states. This is what fascism looks like and it's spreading throughout the Westernised world and COVID-19 is the boogyman in the room that the government will "protect" you from if you surrender your rights to a Pol Pot type police force.
I intend to continue with this
I intend to continue with this
COVID-19 NSW/Australia
Tuesday, 28 April 2020
CoV-19... global pandemic or global government? -P2
I was in Martin Place (Sydney CBD) today outside the Channel 7 TV studio and they have one of those light displays in which a continuous list of headlines is displayed. Among todays' listing was "CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK IMPACTS MENTAL HEALTH", so we have what is supposed to be a physical illness now drawing in mental health. This would suggest that any "cure" would have to compose of physical and mental elements, but there is one component that would make it 'complete' - the spiritual.
I suppose you could say there is a spiritual component or more correctly an anti-spiritual component, it is called atheism which has been indoctrinated into children via the education system along with the likes of transgenderism and other forms of political correctness. This has been the case for the past 15 years in New South Wales schools, and this has been done by Marxist teachers who have planted themselves in the schools. This is part of a tactic known as "Storming the institutions", and atheism is taught in opposition to religious classes under the title "Ethics" which is the indoctrination of moral relativism.
So lets examine what we have...
Religion effectively being abolished
A sense of paranoia that needs 'mental health professionals'
Medical dishonesty and corruption
An entrenched and protected bureaucracy
Select protected businesses at the expense of others
Removal of established rights
Destruction of independent free enterprise
Government delegating responsibilities to select private/corporate enterprise
An education system which indoctrinates atheism to children
Essentially this is a cocktail of Marxism and Fascism which is served up by Fabianism. But has it been seen before? Yes it has but it didn't fully succeed, it like the coronavirus piggybacked on civil disturbance. It was known as the Bolshevik revolution and the original aim of that revolution was to take the entire world. It was firstly to take Europe and by default its colonies, trust territories, protectorates and so on. After that the abolition of religion but especially Christianity, as history shows Russia and its territories became the Soviet Union and religion was abolished. But it didn't just end at Russia, Hungary briefly became a soviet republic under Bela Kun as did the German kingdom state of Bavaria.
Some people will look at what I just mentioned and say it doesn't matter because it was 100 years ago, but lets look at other things that occurred between 1917 and 1932 such as mainstreaming of psychiatry and its associated pharmaceuticals. We should also thrown in the Wall Street crash which can be clearly explained in the book - The Creature of Jekyll island.
I suppose you could say there is a spiritual component or more correctly an anti-spiritual component, it is called atheism which has been indoctrinated into children via the education system along with the likes of transgenderism and other forms of political correctness. This has been the case for the past 15 years in New South Wales schools, and this has been done by Marxist teachers who have planted themselves in the schools. This is part of a tactic known as "Storming the institutions", and atheism is taught in opposition to religious classes under the title "Ethics" which is the indoctrination of moral relativism.
So lets examine what we have...
Religion effectively being abolished
A sense of paranoia that needs 'mental health professionals'
Medical dishonesty and corruption
An entrenched and protected bureaucracy
Select protected businesses at the expense of others
Removal of established rights
Destruction of independent free enterprise
Government delegating responsibilities to select private/corporate enterprise
An education system which indoctrinates atheism to children
Essentially this is a cocktail of Marxism and Fascism which is served up by Fabianism. But has it been seen before? Yes it has but it didn't fully succeed, it like the coronavirus piggybacked on civil disturbance. It was known as the Bolshevik revolution and the original aim of that revolution was to take the entire world. It was firstly to take Europe and by default its colonies, trust territories, protectorates and so on. After that the abolition of religion but especially Christianity, as history shows Russia and its territories became the Soviet Union and religion was abolished. But it didn't just end at Russia, Hungary briefly became a soviet republic under Bela Kun as did the German kingdom state of Bavaria.
Some people will look at what I just mentioned and say it doesn't matter because it was 100 years ago, but lets look at other things that occurred between 1917 and 1932 such as mainstreaming of psychiatry and its associated pharmaceuticals. We should also thrown in the Wall Street crash which can be clearly explained in the book - The Creature of Jekyll island.
CoV-19... global pandemic or global government? -P1
I am in Sydney, Australia and I am seeing basically the Book of Revelation occuring here. Despite this situation supposedly being a "medical" condition it has been largely replied to in a martial way. Sydney is now overrun with state police, federal police, state sheriffs (from the court system), council rangers and there has been an increase in private security guards.
As for doctors, nurses and other health workers being on the street? There has been extremely few to none. But what I have noticed is that the state and federal governments give out proclamations which counter (if not diametrically oppose) each other. It seems we are being ruled by a moral relativist ideology, "what true for you is true for you and whats true to me is true to me." Maybe this old saying by Hasan of Alamut (founder of the Assassins movement) is more relevant - "Nothing is true; all is permitted". And this is what we have today.
Indeed on Australian TV we were told that there were 8 varieties of the CoVID-19 virus, now we are told there are 30 varieties. We are told it is also 'evolving' to somehow make itself resistant to vaccines and other medicines.
We were told if you got it you died, it reminds me of the HIV/AIDS hysteria of the 1980s. The paranoia among the population has become so ingrained even the public toilets in the Sydney CBD have been shutdown. Why? Because the virus is waiting for you to go into the toilet (these are unisex single cubicles) so it can infect you! The Sydney CBD also has an army of people continually washing and sweeping the streets because "virus gonna get ya!", despite the fact that CoVID-19 is an aerial virus. But what sort of virus is it? More people will die from common colds and flu than from this 'designer' disease.
In Australia church services have been abolished which also abolished Easter and the April 25 Anzac Day (veteran remembrance day) what effectively abolished and what took its place was a parody. As far as both state and federal governments were concerned it was to be commemorated by standing in your driveway at dawn, much in the same way you wait for a taxi or a pizza. Church services and Easter weren't worthy of a mention. There is no guaranteed date to when this will end and what people have to consider is that there is no guarantee that the rights and freedoms that have been taken away will ever return.
So Australia is being put on a war footing because of a disease that actually cannot be defined, and as it cannot be defined it cannot be cured. You should also note that when CoVID-19 became known among the general population one of the first things done by the government (as a whole) was to recruit and send out hundreds of thousands of "mental care professionals". When was the last time you called a psychiatrist or psychologist or social worker the last time you coughed?
In fact CoVID-19 has no special symptoms that differentiate it from a cold or flu, in fact in most cases it has no symptoms. I remember a TV segment in which a girl claimed to have CoVID-19 despite having no symptoms but she "knew" she had it and it was accepted by everyone.
So is it a genuine virus? Or is it a variant of another virus which allows more lethal viruses to piggyback upon it which actually cause fatalities? Myself I think it is actually pneumonia that is killing people, infants and the elderly are the most prone to this and make most of the fatalities. You might ask why the medical fraternity is not explaining all that is happening in simple logical terms, I will answer that by saying that you are not dealing with an independent grouping of doctors. No you are dealing with the World Health Organisation (W.H.O.) which is an agency of the United Nations (U.N.) and is largely made up of bureaucrats, one worlders, and other hangers on. For people like these as well as celebrity types among others, the CoV-19 is a never ending, well paying mealticket.
You can add in closure of independent private enterprise, this being done with "social distancing" policing. Unless your customers are at least 1.5 metres away from each other you will be fined. Depending on who you have spying on your business you can be busted if they are not in a space of 4 square metres alone. The punishment is fines (a typical business will be hit $1500 for a violation) and indeed this does seem to be more about shutting down independent private enterprise and lining the states' pockets. If people choose to buy milk in a supermarket (corporate) then why is it deemed an 'essential' business and yet a coffee shop will be hit for providing the same service. And yet a coffee shop can cater for social distancing whereas a supermarket cannot or will not.
As for doctors, nurses and other health workers being on the street? There has been extremely few to none. But what I have noticed is that the state and federal governments give out proclamations which counter (if not diametrically oppose) each other. It seems we are being ruled by a moral relativist ideology, "what true for you is true for you and whats true to me is true to me." Maybe this old saying by Hasan of Alamut (founder of the Assassins movement) is more relevant - "Nothing is true; all is permitted". And this is what we have today.
Indeed on Australian TV we were told that there were 8 varieties of the CoVID-19 virus, now we are told there are 30 varieties. We are told it is also 'evolving' to somehow make itself resistant to vaccines and other medicines.
We were told if you got it you died, it reminds me of the HIV/AIDS hysteria of the 1980s. The paranoia among the population has become so ingrained even the public toilets in the Sydney CBD have been shutdown. Why? Because the virus is waiting for you to go into the toilet (these are unisex single cubicles) so it can infect you! The Sydney CBD also has an army of people continually washing and sweeping the streets because "virus gonna get ya!", despite the fact that CoVID-19 is an aerial virus. But what sort of virus is it? More people will die from common colds and flu than from this 'designer' disease.
In Australia church services have been abolished which also abolished Easter and the April 25 Anzac Day (veteran remembrance day) what effectively abolished and what took its place was a parody. As far as both state and federal governments were concerned it was to be commemorated by standing in your driveway at dawn, much in the same way you wait for a taxi or a pizza. Church services and Easter weren't worthy of a mention. There is no guaranteed date to when this will end and what people have to consider is that there is no guarantee that the rights and freedoms that have been taken away will ever return.
So Australia is being put on a war footing because of a disease that actually cannot be defined, and as it cannot be defined it cannot be cured. You should also note that when CoVID-19 became known among the general population one of the first things done by the government (as a whole) was to recruit and send out hundreds of thousands of "mental care professionals". When was the last time you called a psychiatrist or psychologist or social worker the last time you coughed?
In fact CoVID-19 has no special symptoms that differentiate it from a cold or flu, in fact in most cases it has no symptoms. I remember a TV segment in which a girl claimed to have CoVID-19 despite having no symptoms but she "knew" she had it and it was accepted by everyone.
So is it a genuine virus? Or is it a variant of another virus which allows more lethal viruses to piggyback upon it which actually cause fatalities? Myself I think it is actually pneumonia that is killing people, infants and the elderly are the most prone to this and make most of the fatalities. You might ask why the medical fraternity is not explaining all that is happening in simple logical terms, I will answer that by saying that you are not dealing with an independent grouping of doctors. No you are dealing with the World Health Organisation (W.H.O.) which is an agency of the United Nations (U.N.) and is largely made up of bureaucrats, one worlders, and other hangers on. For people like these as well as celebrity types among others, the CoV-19 is a never ending, well paying mealticket.
You can add in closure of independent private enterprise, this being done with "social distancing" policing. Unless your customers are at least 1.5 metres away from each other you will be fined. Depending on who you have spying on your business you can be busted if they are not in a space of 4 square metres alone. The punishment is fines (a typical business will be hit $1500 for a violation) and indeed this does seem to be more about shutting down independent private enterprise and lining the states' pockets. If people choose to buy milk in a supermarket (corporate) then why is it deemed an 'essential' business and yet a coffee shop will be hit for providing the same service. And yet a coffee shop can cater for social distancing whereas a supermarket cannot or will not.
Wednesday, 15 April 2020
The Second Bolshevik Revolution - part 3
The Second Bolshevik Revolution - part 3
You know the old 'frog in the pot' routine? Take a frog and put it in a pot of cold water, then put it on a stove and slowly heat it up. The frog will boil to death without realising it. This routine is quite evident in Sydney Australia and is a direct rip off the former Soviet economies. We have people employed in stupid, useless and pointless jobs, we have people continually sweeping streets (both with brooms and mechanical street sweepers), people employed doing roadworks which seem to have no beginning, no end, and no purpose, constant patrolling of streets by police officers, council rangers, military personal and an explosion in the employment of private security guards. We have council employees who are assigned to mow the same patch of grass for 8 hours a day. This is simply soul deading employment in order to maintain appearances, we can also throw in public transportation where there are constant streams of trains and buses without passengers. All just to keep up appearances.
Yes this is the sort of employment that was used by communist regimes to 'keep up appearances' but a major difference is that this form of employment is being given to private contractors, so essentially we have a public and private partnership in maintaining this farce. Although I have never agreed with Antifa on most points I have to on this. Australia has essentially become an authoritarian state, indeed a fascist state if we are to judge on an economy scale alone. I am yet to figure out how constant patrolling by security agencies and government employees fights disease. The only thing that it seems to fight is freedom of association, and I am still waiting for actual physical evidence that this CoVID-19 virus exists (what happened to the previous term "Corona"?). We are told that there are 30 strains of this virus at large along with being told that it is "evolving" and constantly changing to resist various antibiotics and vaccines which are yet to be invented. These are obvious lies and yet people continually force feed themselves this utterly corrupt pap.
Donald Trump is absolutely right in pointing the finger at the World Health Organisation and its duplicity. Remember the W.H.O. is simply an appendage of the United Nations, and as the U.N. is all for a world government then by default so is the W.H.O. Without a doubt this is the Second Bolshevik Revolution, the first world countries will fall and the third world countries which they prop up will be compelled to follow. Its as simple as that.
If you want to research more on this situation I suggest you look up the subject of "Wetiko", this will certainly open your mind and your eyes up. Are we dealing with a psychological germ that causes a psychological illness and is spread by psychological means?
Now we are having "relaxation" of various conditions of lockdown, yes tomorrow we have granted the ability to have a visitor to our home. Oh how generous! However it is subject to the condition that we only have one visitor at any given time, so this isn't a guaranteed right and is subject to cancellation at any given time. This is dictatorship by whim, must like you have in 3rd world banana republics or in the likes of ancient Rome. However as Australia is composed of states the implementation can vary, from the more lenient to absolute intolerance.
Speaking of ancient Rome we are being led to believe that sporting competitions can resume, yes it's time for the 'beer and circuses'. The emphasis is on rugby league and New Zealand is part of the main competition. As there are still border closures between states and nations then New Zealand cannot participate in the competition. The solution? Abolish borders between Australia and New Zealand... I shit you not. And people will go along with it because sport is more important than national sovereignty. People here will sell their nation, their society, indeed everything for temporary and pointless entertainment.
You can look at my "Kabbalah and health" clips if you like
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrRk5Tpt-kx1CgvuZKYPPIbNwLFP8JyPt
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrRk5Tpt-kx1CgvuZKYPPIbNwLFP8JyPt
You know the old 'frog in the pot' routine? Take a frog and put it in a pot of cold water, then put it on a stove and slowly heat it up. The frog will boil to death without realising it. This routine is quite evident in Sydney Australia and is a direct rip off the former Soviet economies. We have people employed in stupid, useless and pointless jobs, we have people continually sweeping streets (both with brooms and mechanical street sweepers), people employed doing roadworks which seem to have no beginning, no end, and no purpose, constant patrolling of streets by police officers, council rangers, military personal and an explosion in the employment of private security guards. We have council employees who are assigned to mow the same patch of grass for 8 hours a day. This is simply soul deading employment in order to maintain appearances, we can also throw in public transportation where there are constant streams of trains and buses without passengers. All just to keep up appearances.
Yes this is the sort of employment that was used by communist regimes to 'keep up appearances' but a major difference is that this form of employment is being given to private contractors, so essentially we have a public and private partnership in maintaining this farce. Although I have never agreed with Antifa on most points I have to on this. Australia has essentially become an authoritarian state, indeed a fascist state if we are to judge on an economy scale alone. I am yet to figure out how constant patrolling by security agencies and government employees fights disease. The only thing that it seems to fight is freedom of association, and I am still waiting for actual physical evidence that this CoVID-19 virus exists (what happened to the previous term "Corona"?). We are told that there are 30 strains of this virus at large along with being told that it is "evolving" and constantly changing to resist various antibiotics and vaccines which are yet to be invented. These are obvious lies and yet people continually force feed themselves this utterly corrupt pap.
Donald Trump is absolutely right in pointing the finger at the World Health Organisation and its duplicity. Remember the W.H.O. is simply an appendage of the United Nations, and as the U.N. is all for a world government then by default so is the W.H.O. Without a doubt this is the Second Bolshevik Revolution, the first world countries will fall and the third world countries which they prop up will be compelled to follow. Its as simple as that.
If you want to research more on this situation I suggest you look up the subject of "Wetiko", this will certainly open your mind and your eyes up. Are we dealing with a psychological germ that causes a psychological illness and is spread by psychological means?
Now we are having "relaxation" of various conditions of lockdown, yes tomorrow we have granted the ability to have a visitor to our home. Oh how generous! However it is subject to the condition that we only have one visitor at any given time, so this isn't a guaranteed right and is subject to cancellation at any given time. This is dictatorship by whim, must like you have in 3rd world banana republics or in the likes of ancient Rome. However as Australia is composed of states the implementation can vary, from the more lenient to absolute intolerance.
Speaking of ancient Rome we are being led to believe that sporting competitions can resume, yes it's time for the 'beer and circuses'. The emphasis is on rugby league and New Zealand is part of the main competition. As there are still border closures between states and nations then New Zealand cannot participate in the competition. The solution? Abolish borders between Australia and New Zealand... I shit you not. And people will go along with it because sport is more important than national sovereignty. People here will sell their nation, their society, indeed everything for temporary and pointless entertainment.
You can look at my "Kabbalah and health" clips if you like
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrRk5Tpt-kx1CgvuZKYPPIbNwLFP8JyPt
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrRk5Tpt-kx1CgvuZKYPPIbNwLFP8JyPt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)