I went to spellsofmagic.com to post about magic to show what its really about instead of worshipping pixies and elves and expecting to get everything they want.
Needless to say I wasnt appreciated by the moderators, I especially got hassled by a moderator named Brysing.
Now if you havent been to that site, well to sum it up it is overrun by dumbass kids and the mentally ill. So this moderator called Brysing starts hassling me and trying to bait me to have me violate the forum rules. He states he is an atheist but yet somehow believes in magic and this struck me as rather strange. Brysing doesnt actually write magic spells but just comments on what others write.
The most telling thing is that this guy is about 80 years old and you have to ask 'why is he here?' So I did some cyber sleuthing and discovered to my surprise (actually it wasnt I suspected this guy from day 1).... hes a convicted pedophile.
So it goes like this.....
Brysing was an entertainer in Britain who went under the stagename 'Paul Morrell' which led to a newsite which gives this...
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/sick-and-at-large-1-2257147
As well as this.....
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/we-re-watching-you-1-2257299
So lets look at Brysings' profile on SoM
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/profile.html?profile=104596
And from his profile we look at his photo album which gives us
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/view_pic.html?profile=104596&file=%2fpics%2f96%2f104596%2fmini_1303369322.jpg
So have I done enough to make a case that Brysing the moderator from spellsofmagic.com is actually Brian Uttley the pedophile?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that child molesters and rapists have become so common in England that no one gives a shit anymore.
I have emailed people in Leeds (where he is) about him hanging out on the spellsofmagic site but no one has bothered to email me back as to whether Im right or wrong.
I even PMed some members on the spellsofmagic site about what I wrote here, I picked them from a thread which complained about perverts on the site trying to arrange hookups with them.
I got a reply from the biggest bellyacher on that thread with a 'how dare you say that!'
But I also note that people have complained on the thread very recently that the mods do nothing about complaints about perverts.
So Im wondering........
1. Is this site setup as a tinder for pedos?
2. Is it a honeytrap to catch them?
3. Or is the owner so morally bankrupt that he will allow pedos to trawl it, he has an online store that has 9K different trinkets to sell to kids. So he wont do anything because it is bad for business.
Some more links on Brian Uttley
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/main-topics/local-stories/rapist-wins-appeal-over-his-rights-1-2525382
http://echr.ketse.com/doc/36946.03-en-20051129/view/
.................................................. ...
This is the crap I get for warning people
Re: Pedophile moderator from H2OfanRikki
Do not spread rumors like this.
The person who wrote this knows nothing of the website or magick.
I make nothing of this, especially from someone with no photo or bio.
Good Day..
In reply to:
Brysing the moderator is actually a convicted pedophile
http://downloadpolitics.com/entry.php?663-The-pedophile-Brysing
Links in the blog confirm this
His actual name is Brian Uttley and he was a stage performer under the name Paul Morrell
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
UPDATE:
Brian Uttley the pedophile is said to have died approximately a month ago. The scumbags at spellsofmagic.com posted tributes to him, but I have yet to find any funeral notice or obiturary concerning him.
He might not be dead after all.....
Information about a new satanic trinity formed by bael, moloch and mammon and how atheism serves that end. Written by an ex satanist (me - leon xiv) See me on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnqUEbnfbt61iecCRL6mHOw And you can download my E-Books (free!) Taking, Holding, Keeping - Possession and Exorcism Today https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1072574 Creed of Assiah https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/392310
Showing posts with label atheist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheist. Show all posts
Sunday, 11 October 2015
Sunday, 5 July 2015
Questions for atheists
Care to answer these?......
#1 - If no supernatural Creator exists, how did the universe originate?
What was the nature of the enviroment that the 'big bang' emanated from?
#2 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, why is the earth suitable for the existence of life? Why isnt there life on other planets?
#3 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, how did life originate? Did life come from inanimate objects?
#4 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, what caused the repeated disappearance of more primitive forms of life and the appearance of new more advanced forms of life?
[For example, at the beginning of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic.]
#5 - If no God exists who can work miracles and communicate with men, how did the ancient Israelites come to believe that their ancestors experienced the Exodus and the Revelation at Mt. Sinai?
#6 - If God did not give the 10 commandments at Mt. Sinai, why is it that societies that have adhered to them have been relatively stable and why is it that the judges, magistrates and politicians of the new self appointed patrician caste have sabotaged them? Is this not an act of war against God?
#7 - If we have no soul, why do we feel conscious of ourselves?
#8 - If we have no free will, why do we feel that we are making free choices?
#9 - If no God exists, why are we obligated to be nice other people? Why do we feel the need to? Is it that we are mere animals who just seek material gain from others?
#10 – If we live in a purely material world then how do we account for the many supernatural experiences that people have, such as encounters with God, ghosts, spirits, etc (obviously, exactly what all of these encounters actually are are all interpreted by different people in different ways but the fact remains that people encounter things that do not fit a purely naturalistic world view). Are we really to conclude that all of these people are delusional, deceptive, or mad? Or could it be that people are having real encounters with real supernatural beings not explainable through purely scientific mediums?
#11 - Where does all of the incredibly complex information come from that is stored within DNA? Information doesn’t just appear by itself. Someone has to put it there.
#12 - Atheists are mostly found to be employed in the academic/government fields. What is it about the atheist personality that attracts them to these fields? And why have these fields been overrun by political correctness?
#13 - Where does all the matter in the universe come from?
#14 - What is the source of math and logic? The existence of this remarkably fine-tuned universe aside, how is it that we have these "languages of reality" to so elegantly describe and interact with it?
#15 - What type of government does atheistic philosophy translate into?
How does it understand the relationship between man and government?
What type of government structures flow from an atheistic world view?
Does it merely rely on someone else's system of thought, like the assumptions of naturalistic science?
#16 - Believers are often accused of being simple-minded,superstitious, or irrational.
Why is it so irrational for us to believe that the universe had a beginning because it actually was created; the laws of physics are so fine-tuned because it had a designer; people are preoccupied with good and evil because they are real things; we long for purpose and meaning because they exist to be had; life from non-life really is miraculous; consciousness and freewill seem real because they are; people are incurably religious because there is actually something real in religion.
If there really is no meaning or purpose to life, no objective good or evil, and the existence of "truth" itself is open to debate, by what standard will you condemn the beliefs of believers?
#17 - How does an atheist assign meaning to human activity? Is all meaning subjective, or do some activities have self-evident and objective worth and meaning. If so, what are these activities, and how to you arrive at their value?
#18 - Are humans of more intrinsic value than animals? Why or why not?
#19 - How does an atheist determine what is moral or immoral, right or wrong. Is there any objective standard or principles?
#20 - If you claim that Jesus was a myth then what alternative explanation do you offer to the New Testament documentation and the tradition of the church, and what support do you have for your theory? Is it because of the miracles that you doubt the Scriptures?
#21 - Why is it that despite all the lauded scientific 'achievements' that there is an interest in the occult and magic which is increasing?
#22 - Many people believe that the moon and other planets have an effect on the psyche. Although this may be called astrology the fact is that the moon has effects on the likes of ocean tides. Do you call this a superstition under the name of astrology or a scientific fact?
#23 - The problem of abiogenesis (the origin of the first lifeform) is one of the thorniest and most intractable issues in chemistry. Our increasing knowledge of microbiology and earth history has only added to the complexity of what needs to be explained. The simplest life is equivalent to modern bacteria, which is loaded with complex activity, information, and molecular "machines." The fossil record does not give evidence that there was a "prebiotic soup," or that there were any biological precursors to the first organisms, or that the atmosphere was the ideal mix to yield the necessary molecules, or that there was the expected long period of time between when the Earth could support life and when it actually appeared.
Evolutionists regularly segregate the abiogenesis problem from the issue of evolution because (1) it is a challenge they'd rather not be saddled with, or (2) it is the most logical point for possible divine intervention.
However, for the atheist there is no escaping this issue; they are obliged to seek out some purely natural explanation.
a). What hope for an explanation do you have? Are you satisfied to have problems like this that are unanswered, or even unanswerable?
b). In telling the tale of life on earth science writers often unconsciously use the word "miracle" for the appearance of the first organisms. Is this doubt on their behalf as to what they would like to prove as to the creation of existance?
c). What kind of evidence is needed before we are to actually accept that something like this really is a miracle?
#24 - The past several decades have added profoundly to our knowledge of chemistry, physics, and cosmology.
It has become increasingly clear that we live in a universe finely tuned for the support of complex life.
This fact is so universally acknowledged that even secular scientists have coined the term "Anthropic Principle" to describe it.
How is it that we live in such an exquisitely fine-tuned universe?
Even assuming that the universe could have popped out of nothingness, why should it have been such an orderly and hospitable one? Is there a scientific, testable answer for this question that does not simply appeal to imagination?
#25 - Atheism, by definition, holds that there is no God and nothing beyond this world of matter, space, time, and energy. Consistent with this viewpoint come a large number of necessary truths and the problems relating to them. Atheism is not made rational merely by the rejection of the evidences for God; it has its own wares to sell and difficulties to overcome.
a.) What Is the Evidence Against the Existence of God?
b.) If everyone on earth became an atheist how would the world be better off?
c.) Does not atheism have to rely on a system of coercion to enforce non belief?
d.) Most nations that have a system of government under a monarchy do so because of strong religious connection. The USA is referred to as 'One nation under God'. Is it a atheist aim to abolish royal families and the sovereignty of nations like the Maoists have achieved in Nepal and replace all sovereign nations with a world government?
e.) Why are atheists always at the forefront of marxist tainted 'causes' such as global warming, unrestricted immigration, gay marriage and other latte type neo-liberal causes?
f.) Why have atheists, pagans and satanists been infiltrating 'white supremacist' organisations and attempting to turn racial issues into solely religious issues? Examples being the anti-3rd world immigration issue is now an anti-muslim issue. The same could be said for leftist 'anti-zionist' causes that attack Jews solely on the basis of their religious beliefs and nothing else.
#26 - Why is it that atheists only target their approach to the young (20 and under) instead of those of their own age? Is it because people who are 40+ are not worth 'educating'? Or is it that gullible teenagers have bodies worth 'indoctrinating'?
#27 - If evolution is true, why is everything so determined that we can study it?
#28 - Is it possible to study something that is always changing, like evolution?
#29 - If you believe that there is no god, how do you explain the concept of synchronicity. Do you dispute it because of the law of large numbers says otherwise? Maybe you just have faith in this axiom and it is really not an accurate description of reality.
#1 - If no supernatural Creator exists, how did the universe originate?
What was the nature of the enviroment that the 'big bang' emanated from?
#2 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, why is the earth suitable for the existence of life? Why isnt there life on other planets?
#3 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, how did life originate? Did life come from inanimate objects?
#4 - If no supernatural universal Designer exists, what caused the repeated disappearance of more primitive forms of life and the appearance of new more advanced forms of life?
[For example, at the beginning of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic.]
#5 - If no God exists who can work miracles and communicate with men, how did the ancient Israelites come to believe that their ancestors experienced the Exodus and the Revelation at Mt. Sinai?
#6 - If God did not give the 10 commandments at Mt. Sinai, why is it that societies that have adhered to them have been relatively stable and why is it that the judges, magistrates and politicians of the new self appointed patrician caste have sabotaged them? Is this not an act of war against God?
#7 - If we have no soul, why do we feel conscious of ourselves?
#8 - If we have no free will, why do we feel that we are making free choices?
#9 - If no God exists, why are we obligated to be nice other people? Why do we feel the need to? Is it that we are mere animals who just seek material gain from others?
#10 – If we live in a purely material world then how do we account for the many supernatural experiences that people have, such as encounters with God, ghosts, spirits, etc (obviously, exactly what all of these encounters actually are are all interpreted by different people in different ways but the fact remains that people encounter things that do not fit a purely naturalistic world view). Are we really to conclude that all of these people are delusional, deceptive, or mad? Or could it be that people are having real encounters with real supernatural beings not explainable through purely scientific mediums?
#11 - Where does all of the incredibly complex information come from that is stored within DNA? Information doesn’t just appear by itself. Someone has to put it there.
#12 - Atheists are mostly found to be employed in the academic/government fields. What is it about the atheist personality that attracts them to these fields? And why have these fields been overrun by political correctness?
#13 - Where does all the matter in the universe come from?
#14 - What is the source of math and logic? The existence of this remarkably fine-tuned universe aside, how is it that we have these "languages of reality" to so elegantly describe and interact with it?
#15 - What type of government does atheistic philosophy translate into?
How does it understand the relationship between man and government?
What type of government structures flow from an atheistic world view?
Does it merely rely on someone else's system of thought, like the assumptions of naturalistic science?
#16 - Believers are often accused of being simple-minded,superstitious, or irrational.
Why is it so irrational for us to believe that the universe had a beginning because it actually was created; the laws of physics are so fine-tuned because it had a designer; people are preoccupied with good and evil because they are real things; we long for purpose and meaning because they exist to be had; life from non-life really is miraculous; consciousness and freewill seem real because they are; people are incurably religious because there is actually something real in religion.
If there really is no meaning or purpose to life, no objective good or evil, and the existence of "truth" itself is open to debate, by what standard will you condemn the beliefs of believers?
#17 - How does an atheist assign meaning to human activity? Is all meaning subjective, or do some activities have self-evident and objective worth and meaning. If so, what are these activities, and how to you arrive at their value?
#18 - Are humans of more intrinsic value than animals? Why or why not?
#19 - How does an atheist determine what is moral or immoral, right or wrong. Is there any objective standard or principles?
#20 - If you claim that Jesus was a myth then what alternative explanation do you offer to the New Testament documentation and the tradition of the church, and what support do you have for your theory? Is it because of the miracles that you doubt the Scriptures?
#21 - Why is it that despite all the lauded scientific 'achievements' that there is an interest in the occult and magic which is increasing?
#22 - Many people believe that the moon and other planets have an effect on the psyche. Although this may be called astrology the fact is that the moon has effects on the likes of ocean tides. Do you call this a superstition under the name of astrology or a scientific fact?
#23 - The problem of abiogenesis (the origin of the first lifeform) is one of the thorniest and most intractable issues in chemistry. Our increasing knowledge of microbiology and earth history has only added to the complexity of what needs to be explained. The simplest life is equivalent to modern bacteria, which is loaded with complex activity, information, and molecular "machines." The fossil record does not give evidence that there was a "prebiotic soup," or that there were any biological precursors to the first organisms, or that the atmosphere was the ideal mix to yield the necessary molecules, or that there was the expected long period of time between when the Earth could support life and when it actually appeared.
Evolutionists regularly segregate the abiogenesis problem from the issue of evolution because (1) it is a challenge they'd rather not be saddled with, or (2) it is the most logical point for possible divine intervention.
However, for the atheist there is no escaping this issue; they are obliged to seek out some purely natural explanation.
a). What hope for an explanation do you have? Are you satisfied to have problems like this that are unanswered, or even unanswerable?
b). In telling the tale of life on earth science writers often unconsciously use the word "miracle" for the appearance of the first organisms. Is this doubt on their behalf as to what they would like to prove as to the creation of existance?
c). What kind of evidence is needed before we are to actually accept that something like this really is a miracle?
#24 - The past several decades have added profoundly to our knowledge of chemistry, physics, and cosmology.
It has become increasingly clear that we live in a universe finely tuned for the support of complex life.
This fact is so universally acknowledged that even secular scientists have coined the term "Anthropic Principle" to describe it.
How is it that we live in such an exquisitely fine-tuned universe?
Even assuming that the universe could have popped out of nothingness, why should it have been such an orderly and hospitable one? Is there a scientific, testable answer for this question that does not simply appeal to imagination?
#25 - Atheism, by definition, holds that there is no God and nothing beyond this world of matter, space, time, and energy. Consistent with this viewpoint come a large number of necessary truths and the problems relating to them. Atheism is not made rational merely by the rejection of the evidences for God; it has its own wares to sell and difficulties to overcome.
a.) What Is the Evidence Against the Existence of God?
b.) If everyone on earth became an atheist how would the world be better off?
c.) Does not atheism have to rely on a system of coercion to enforce non belief?
d.) Most nations that have a system of government under a monarchy do so because of strong religious connection. The USA is referred to as 'One nation under God'. Is it a atheist aim to abolish royal families and the sovereignty of nations like the Maoists have achieved in Nepal and replace all sovereign nations with a world government?
e.) Why are atheists always at the forefront of marxist tainted 'causes' such as global warming, unrestricted immigration, gay marriage and other latte type neo-liberal causes?
f.) Why have atheists, pagans and satanists been infiltrating 'white supremacist' organisations and attempting to turn racial issues into solely religious issues? Examples being the anti-3rd world immigration issue is now an anti-muslim issue. The same could be said for leftist 'anti-zionist' causes that attack Jews solely on the basis of their religious beliefs and nothing else.
#26 - Why is it that atheists only target their approach to the young (20 and under) instead of those of their own age? Is it because people who are 40+ are not worth 'educating'? Or is it that gullible teenagers have bodies worth 'indoctrinating'?
#27 - If evolution is true, why is everything so determined that we can study it?
#28 - Is it possible to study something that is always changing, like evolution?
#29 - If you believe that there is no god, how do you explain the concept of synchronicity. Do you dispute it because of the law of large numbers says otherwise? Maybe you just have faith in this axiom and it is really not an accurate description of reality.
Monday, 8 December 2014
2. If the above happens, then the Tree of Life in Assiah would be
missing a sephira. In that case the Tree of Life in Assiah would not be
able to stand unless a new earth was created for it, or else another
earth was relegated to its place (there are seven earths).
But a fake god and a fake messiah won’t be strong enough on their own to bring about a new earth. And thus this is why the disholy trinity are content to let atheists serve them by default, all the disholy trinity need do is introduce realms of battle and the atheists will do the rest unthinkingly because they have absolute zeal in hating God.
A new Tikkun Olam: Tikkun Olam means to restore the world, or more specifically this world and indeed all creation in this world (Assiah). The need for this came after the ‘breaking of the vessels’. Although this is a term that is referred to in Kabbalistic/Judaist works, the same principle can apply across all religions to do good and moral works. However with the large rate of atheism in Judaism especially in white countries and an inability or unwillingness by Judaist communities to expel them. Whatever bona fide Tikkun Olam works the faithful may do are poisoned by the atheists within the synagogue because of their moral relativism. The only thing that atheist askhenazi jews work for is to implement a caste system to preserve and improve their bloodline, and thus they can be found at the forefront of left wing anti-white causes.
But a fake god and a fake messiah won’t be strong enough on their own to bring about a new earth. And thus this is why the disholy trinity are content to let atheists serve them by default, all the disholy trinity need do is introduce realms of battle and the atheists will do the rest unthinkingly because they have absolute zeal in hating God.
A new Tikkun Olam: Tikkun Olam means to restore the world, or more specifically this world and indeed all creation in this world (Assiah). The need for this came after the ‘breaking of the vessels’. Although this is a term that is referred to in Kabbalistic/Judaist works, the same principle can apply across all religions to do good and moral works. However with the large rate of atheism in Judaism especially in white countries and an inability or unwillingness by Judaist communities to expel them. Whatever bona fide Tikkun Olam works the faithful may do are poisoned by the atheists within the synagogue because of their moral relativism. The only thing that atheist askhenazi jews work for is to implement a caste system to preserve and improve their bloodline, and thus they can be found at the forefront of left wing anti-white causes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)