As this world goes into freefall with the stupid directing the flow of traffic in society, we have to examine how this came about and why the Tree of Death is now the tree of the kabbalah in Assiah instead of the Tree of Life. With the Tree of Death the virtues and vices of the Tree of Life are reversed and as we are in Assiah (the world of action) they are being applied in realtime.
We can see this everyday, your right to discriminate about the company you keep is outlawed by 'anti discrimination' laws, you have the catchcry of 'antisemitism' concerning any dispute between a 'jew' and a gentile even though 99.9% of jews are not semites. Queers getting married even though marriage was never meant to be applied to them, pedophiles now being renamed as 'minor attracted adults' and so on.
We are seeing a reversal of order in realtime, a lot of people blame the jews but todays' jews are not descendants of Moses and 95% of these people do not practice any faith resembling that of ancient Judaism (Mosaic faith) but are divided between atheists, pantheists and tribal bloodline 'christians' (as well as other religions). Ultra orthodox judaists should be the only ones who can call themselves jews, the others should just call themselves tribal gypsies because apart from being of a 'jewish' mother they have no real connection to anything remotely semitic.
But I cannot just say that Judaism has this problem, apostasy has spread to Christianity and Islam. In Christianity we have 'christian zionism' where the fools who follow it believe in blessing jews and israel (even though they hate Jesus) as a priority over worshipping Christ Jesus of Bethlehem and Nazareth. And in Islam we have the wahhabi apostasy where abandoning wahhabism is worthy of losing your head (but being atheist is neither here or there, as long as you identify as a wahhabi then its OK).
So we have the 3 primary Abrahamic faiths are under attack from within, you may be wondering how all this came about? Well.... I'm not 2K years old and havent seen everything thats happened, I can only give you my deduction and opinion so here it is.
What is commonly known as Sabbateanism is a maltheist gnostic creed, it is a mish mash of religious history from Judaism and Christianity and indeed as well as Islam.
Considering that the jews of that time (1600s and indeed onwards to today) are the descendants of converts from Europe, the Caucasus and Nth Africa there is no doubt that local practices to the people from those areas became absorbed into their version/sect of Judaism (Askhenazi, Sephardic, etc.) Everything from the opinions of rabbis in the Babylonian Talmud, to bits and pieces of both the Old and New Testaments and probably the Koran as well, to rumours and old wives tales were brought together. And it still happens and this can be seen with splits within judaism, with maternal bloodline deciding on who can enter the synagogue rather than spiritual belief (as evident with the refusal of most synagogues to expel atheists who are open and public of their belief or lack of)
Lets deal with Sabbateanism, I'll use this from Wikipedia.
Sabbateans (Sabbatians) is a complex general term that refers to a variety of followers of, disciples and believers in Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676), a Jewish rabbi who was proclaimed to be the Jewish Messiah in 1665 by Nathan of Gaza. Vast numbers of Jews in the Jewish diaspora accepted his claims, even after he became a Jewish apostate with his conversion to Islam in 1666. Sabbatai Zevi's followers, both during his "Messiahship" and after his conversion to Islam, are known as Sabbateans. They can be grouped into three: "Maaminim" (believers), "Haberim" (associates), and "Ba'ale Milhamah" (warriors).
Actually it was Nathan of Gaza who proclaimed him to be the 'jewish messiah' (non jews need not apply for salvation). Sabbatai Tzevi reportedly knew he was the messiah but 'waited' for Nathan to proclaim him as such. Nathan reportedly was told that Tzevi was the messiah in a vision, by who? I dont think it was ever said, but apparantely neither knew each other before all this came about. This gives me 2 questions...
1. How did Nathan have this vision?
2. Why didnt Tzevi seek to be the saviour of all?
Possible answers I have...
1. Unless both Nathan and Tzevi did actually know each other but kept it all secret in order to pull a cult scam on other jews, then it could be that Nathan was a practitioner of kabbalah. In fact they would both need to be practitioners and indeed kabbalah did/does play a significant part in Sabbateanism, and if they were into kabbalah one has to ask were they using the Tree of Life or the Tree of Death?
The only world where both the Tree of Life and the Tree of Death exist is in Assiah (world of action or material world) and I strongly suspect it was the Tree of Death which is a demonic imitation of the Tree of Life. This would explain the base behaviour of the Sabbatean adherants, their atheism and lack of spirituality (as is evident in synagogues today) and their materialistic driven lusts.
Could Nathan have 'encountered' Tzevi during pathworking on the Tree of Death before actually meeting him physically? ...it is quite possible....
2. Tzevi and Nathan didnt try to push themselves onto Christians and Muslims because they couldnt. Their act was just a ripoff of Jesus Christ and John the Baptist, it would have failed and authorities would have begun an investigation into their practices and methods.
They were not ordained by God.
Tzevi renounced his messiahship under the threat of death from the Turkish sultan, now if he was really the messiah wouldnt he have been prepared to face death than renounce his God ordained mission? Didnt Jesus Christ face a similar situation?
But then again who was Tzevis' 'god'?
So Tzevi became a muslim and took his followers to 'convert' as well, they became what are known as Donmeh Muslims. They were/are muslims in name only and only worship among themselves.
However this is not without precedent, jews in Spain 'converted' to Christianity in order to not be expelled with the Moors. These jews were really 'crypto-jews' and are known as
Marranos and like the Donmeh are seeking to be officially recognised as Judaists... even though they are not.
NB: The ultra orthodox judaists opposes their recognition and they consider both to be practising a perverted form of Christianity. Marranos and Donmeh are also known for their 'atheism' but consider themselves jews because of maternal bloodline.
Thursday, 5 November 2015
Sunday, 11 October 2015
The pedophile Brysing
I went to spellsofmagic.com to post about magic to show what its really about instead of worshipping pixies and elves and expecting to get everything they want.
Needless to say I wasnt appreciated by the moderators, I especially got hassled by a moderator named Brysing.
Now if you havent been to that site, well to sum it up it is overrun by dumbass kids and the mentally ill. So this moderator called Brysing starts hassling me and trying to bait me to have me violate the forum rules. He states he is an atheist but yet somehow believes in magic and this struck me as rather strange. Brysing doesnt actually write magic spells but just comments on what others write.
The most telling thing is that this guy is about 80 years old and you have to ask 'why is he here?' So I did some cyber sleuthing and discovered to my surprise (actually it wasnt I suspected this guy from day 1).... hes a convicted pedophile.
So it goes like this.....
Brysing was an entertainer in Britain who went under the stagename 'Paul Morrell' which led to a newsite which gives this...
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/sick-and-at-large-1-2257147
As well as this.....
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/we-re-watching-you-1-2257299
So lets look at Brysings' profile on SoM
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/profile.html?profile=104596
And from his profile we look at his photo album which gives us
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/view_pic.html?profile=104596&file=%2fpics%2f96%2f104596%2fmini_1303369322.jpg
So have I done enough to make a case that Brysing the moderator from spellsofmagic.com is actually Brian Uttley the pedophile?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that child molesters and rapists have become so common in England that no one gives a shit anymore.
I have emailed people in Leeds (where he is) about him hanging out on the spellsofmagic site but no one has bothered to email me back as to whether Im right or wrong.
I even PMed some members on the spellsofmagic site about what I wrote here, I picked them from a thread which complained about perverts on the site trying to arrange hookups with them.
I got a reply from the biggest bellyacher on that thread with a 'how dare you say that!'
But I also note that people have complained on the thread very recently that the mods do nothing about complaints about perverts.
So Im wondering........
1. Is this site setup as a tinder for pedos?
2. Is it a honeytrap to catch them?
3. Or is the owner so morally bankrupt that he will allow pedos to trawl it, he has an online store that has 9K different trinkets to sell to kids. So he wont do anything because it is bad for business.
Some more links on Brian Uttley
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/main-topics/local-stories/rapist-wins-appeal-over-his-rights-1-2525382
http://echr.ketse.com/doc/36946.03-en-20051129/view/
.................................................. ...
This is the crap I get for warning people
Re: Pedophile moderator from H2OfanRikki
Do not spread rumors like this.
The person who wrote this knows nothing of the website or magick.
I make nothing of this, especially from someone with no photo or bio.
Good Day..
In reply to:
Brysing the moderator is actually a convicted pedophile
http://downloadpolitics.com/entry.php?663-The-pedophile-Brysing
Links in the blog confirm this
His actual name is Brian Uttley and he was a stage performer under the name Paul Morrell
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
UPDATE:
Brian Uttley the pedophile is said to have died approximately a month ago. The scumbags at spellsofmagic.com posted tributes to him, but I have yet to find any funeral notice or obiturary concerning him.
He might not be dead after all.....
Needless to say I wasnt appreciated by the moderators, I especially got hassled by a moderator named Brysing.
Now if you havent been to that site, well to sum it up it is overrun by dumbass kids and the mentally ill. So this moderator called Brysing starts hassling me and trying to bait me to have me violate the forum rules. He states he is an atheist but yet somehow believes in magic and this struck me as rather strange. Brysing doesnt actually write magic spells but just comments on what others write.
The most telling thing is that this guy is about 80 years old and you have to ask 'why is he here?' So I did some cyber sleuthing and discovered to my surprise (actually it wasnt I suspected this guy from day 1).... hes a convicted pedophile.
So it goes like this.....
Brysing was an entertainer in Britain who went under the stagename 'Paul Morrell' which led to a newsite which gives this...
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/sick-and-at-large-1-2257147
As well as this.....
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/latest-news/top-stories/we-re-watching-you-1-2257299
So lets look at Brysings' profile on SoM
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/profile.html?profile=104596
And from his profile we look at his photo album which gives us
http://www.spellsofmagic.com/view_pic.html?profile=104596&file=%2fpics%2f96%2f104596%2fmini_1303369322.jpg
So have I done enough to make a case that Brysing the moderator from spellsofmagic.com is actually Brian Uttley the pedophile?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that child molesters and rapists have become so common in England that no one gives a shit anymore.
I have emailed people in Leeds (where he is) about him hanging out on the spellsofmagic site but no one has bothered to email me back as to whether Im right or wrong.
I even PMed some members on the spellsofmagic site about what I wrote here, I picked them from a thread which complained about perverts on the site trying to arrange hookups with them.
I got a reply from the biggest bellyacher on that thread with a 'how dare you say that!'
But I also note that people have complained on the thread very recently that the mods do nothing about complaints about perverts.
So Im wondering........
1. Is this site setup as a tinder for pedos?
2. Is it a honeytrap to catch them?
3. Or is the owner so morally bankrupt that he will allow pedos to trawl it, he has an online store that has 9K different trinkets to sell to kids. So he wont do anything because it is bad for business.
Some more links on Brian Uttley
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/main-topics/local-stories/rapist-wins-appeal-over-his-rights-1-2525382
http://echr.ketse.com/doc/36946.03-en-20051129/view/
.................................................. ...
This is the crap I get for warning people
Re: Pedophile moderator from H2OfanRikki
Do not spread rumors like this.
The person who wrote this knows nothing of the website or magick.
I make nothing of this, especially from someone with no photo or bio.
Good Day..
In reply to:
Brysing the moderator is actually a convicted pedophile
http://downloadpolitics.com/entry.php?663-The-pedophile-Brysing
Links in the blog confirm this
His actual name is Brian Uttley and he was a stage performer under the name Paul Morrell
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
UPDATE:
Brian Uttley the pedophile is said to have died approximately a month ago. The scumbags at spellsofmagic.com posted tributes to him, but I have yet to find any funeral notice or obiturary concerning him.
He might not be dead after all.....
Wednesday, 16 September 2015
Dajjal is a collective humanist thing?
It was narrated that Abu Bakr Siddiq said: "The Messenger of Allah told us: 'Dajjal will emerge in a land in the east called Khorasan, and will be followed by people with faces like hammered shields.'" and will travel the whole world preaching his falsehood, but will be unable to enter Mecca or Medina. Isa (Jesus) will return and the Dajjal will gather an army of 70,000 Jews from Isfahan, of those he has deceived and lead them in a war against Jesus who shall be accompanied by an army of the righteous, along with Imam Mahdi.
^^^ Again this points to Iran/Iraq and thus Al-Baghdadi
Ahmadiyya beliefs
The Ahmadiyya teachings interpret the prophecies regarding the appearance of the Dajjal (Anti-Christ) and Gog and Magog in Islamic eschatology as foretelling the emergence of two branches or aspects of the same turmoil and trial that was to be faced by Islam in the latter days and that both emerged from Christianity or Christian nations.
^^^ Why do Ahmadiyya seem to know this and say it? Why does sunnism/wahhabism seek to utterly wipe them out and why do Christians, Xtians and atheists (all flavours) have no opinion on this and pretend that everythings OK?
Its Dajjal aspect relates to deception and perversion of religious belief while its aspect to do with disturbance in the realm of politics and the shattering of world peace has been called Gog and Magog. Thus Ahmadis consider the widespread Christian missionary activity that was 'aggressively' active in the 18th and 19th centuries as being part of the prophesied Dajjal (Antichrist) and Gog and Magog emerging in modern times out of Christian nations. Accordingly, the emergence of the Soviet Union and the USA as superpowers and the conflict between the two nations (i.e., the rivalry between communism and capitalism) are seen as having occurred in accordance with certain prophecies regarding Gog and Magog. Thus, Ahmadis believe that prophecies and sayings about the Antichrist are not to be interpreted literally. They have deeper meanings. Masih ad-Dajjal is then a name given to latter day Christianity and the west.
^^^ Its an opinion but I cant really dispute it - nor care to.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gives a more direct definition of the meaning of Dajjal:
"As to the Antichrist, now listen, I will explain to you the reality on the basis of the clear and pure revelation that I have received. Then understand, my dear ones, that it has been disclosed to me that the reference to the Antichrist as one individual is not designed to indicate his personal individuality, but his unity as a class, meaning thereby that in that class there will be a unity of ideas as is, indeed, indicated by the word Dajjal itself and in this name there are many Signs for those who reflect. The meaning of the word Dajjal is a chain of deceptive ideas, the links of which are so attached to each other as if it was a structure of equal-sized bricks of the same colour, quality and strength, some of them firmly overlapping others and further strengthened by being plastered from outside."
^^^ Im not saying that this guys beliefs are absolutely the cure all for the world but again I think his opinion is quite good. Also take note of how the dajjal is not a single person but a collective humanist class aka herd
So you can look it up for yourselves, in addition there is a jewish version of dajjal...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armilus
^^^ Again this points to Iran/Iraq and thus Al-Baghdadi
Ahmadiyya beliefs
The Ahmadiyya teachings interpret the prophecies regarding the appearance of the Dajjal (Anti-Christ) and Gog and Magog in Islamic eschatology as foretelling the emergence of two branches or aspects of the same turmoil and trial that was to be faced by Islam in the latter days and that both emerged from Christianity or Christian nations.
^^^ Why do Ahmadiyya seem to know this and say it? Why does sunnism/wahhabism seek to utterly wipe them out and why do Christians, Xtians and atheists (all flavours) have no opinion on this and pretend that everythings OK?
Its Dajjal aspect relates to deception and perversion of religious belief while its aspect to do with disturbance in the realm of politics and the shattering of world peace has been called Gog and Magog. Thus Ahmadis consider the widespread Christian missionary activity that was 'aggressively' active in the 18th and 19th centuries as being part of the prophesied Dajjal (Antichrist) and Gog and Magog emerging in modern times out of Christian nations. Accordingly, the emergence of the Soviet Union and the USA as superpowers and the conflict between the two nations (i.e., the rivalry between communism and capitalism) are seen as having occurred in accordance with certain prophecies regarding Gog and Magog. Thus, Ahmadis believe that prophecies and sayings about the Antichrist are not to be interpreted literally. They have deeper meanings. Masih ad-Dajjal is then a name given to latter day Christianity and the west.
^^^ Its an opinion but I cant really dispute it - nor care to.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gives a more direct definition of the meaning of Dajjal:
"As to the Antichrist, now listen, I will explain to you the reality on the basis of the clear and pure revelation that I have received. Then understand, my dear ones, that it has been disclosed to me that the reference to the Antichrist as one individual is not designed to indicate his personal individuality, but his unity as a class, meaning thereby that in that class there will be a unity of ideas as is, indeed, indicated by the word Dajjal itself and in this name there are many Signs for those who reflect. The meaning of the word Dajjal is a chain of deceptive ideas, the links of which are so attached to each other as if it was a structure of equal-sized bricks of the same colour, quality and strength, some of them firmly overlapping others and further strengthened by being plastered from outside."
^^^ Im not saying that this guys beliefs are absolutely the cure all for the world but again I think his opinion is quite good. Also take note of how the dajjal is not a single person but a collective humanist class aka herd
So you can look it up for yourselves, in addition there is a jewish version of dajjal...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armilus
Dajjal continued
Although most people just prefer to have a guess at the AntiChrist or when they will appear (even though this cannot be known by any man at any given time), all they do is cough up celebrity 'anti Christs' depending on political interpretations and leanings. But what about the Dajjal? Well that depends on what you believe, do you believe they are one and the same or do you believe they are two separate entities? And could your belief change at any given time? Remember one of the aims of theistic satanism is to pre-empt prophecy and would not rely on a one shot solution.
Instead of trying to interpret certain types of people (very unreliable due to having to accept most information from media sources which could be falsified), it would be much better to interpret observable actions and mindsets within ones' society.
Using this site.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masih_ad-Dajjal
I will use quotes from that site and add commentary.
^^^Is this not the case now?
^^^The only person who I can think of that fits that description at this current time is Al-Baghdadi - the leader of ISIS
As for being considered as Jesus by Christians and Jews when you consider that Christianity and Judaism have been overrun by atheists (more like nihiltheists) and apostates (more like maltheists). Indeed we could also throw in new age perversions such as 'ascended masters' of which 'lord jesus' is an ace card, looking at it... the [unreliable source?] could have been passed through by occult means and actually might be the most telling.
Nihiltheists, perverts and other liberal types support ISIS by default
^^^ speaks for itself
Instead of trying to interpret certain types of people (very unreliable due to having to accept most information from media sources which could be falsified), it would be much better to interpret observable actions and mindsets within ones' society.
Using this site.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masih_ad-Dajjal
I will use quotes from that site and add commentary.
Signs of coming of Al-Masih ad-Dajjal
Hadith attributed to Muhammad give many signs of the appearance of the Dajjal, and exhorted his followers to recite the first and last ten verses of Sura Al-Kahf (chapter 18 in the Qur'an), as protection from the trials and mischief of the Dajjal.
The following signs are ascribed to Ali in the coming of Dajjal:
People will stop offering the prayers
Dishonesty will be the way of life
Falsehood will become a virtue
People will mortgage their faith for worldly gain
Usury and bribery will become legitimate
There will be acute famine at the time
There will be no shame amongst people
Many people would worship Satan
There would be no respect for elderly people
^^^Is this not the case now?
Other Traits of Dajjal
He will be a man with powerful built, curly hair and only a true believer can recognize him.
He (Dajjal) will be followed by seventy thousand Jews wearing black shawls from Isfahan.
He will claim to be Creator/God and will challenge major religious institutions of the world.
He will traverse all the cities of the world, except Mecca and Medina (as they are guarded by angels).
He shall not have any children.
He shall be a Jew.
He would possibly be considered as Jesus (with powers of God) by Christians and Messiah by Jews.[unreliable source?]
^^^The only person who I can think of that fits that description at this current time is Al-Baghdadi - the leader of ISIS
As for being considered as Jesus by Christians and Jews when you consider that Christianity and Judaism have been overrun by atheists (more like nihiltheists) and apostates (more like maltheists). Indeed we could also throw in new age perversions such as 'ascended masters' of which 'lord jesus' is an ace card, looking at it... the [unreliable source?] could have been passed through by occult means and actually might be the most telling.
Nihiltheists, perverts and other liberal types support ISIS by default
Signs of emergence
Drying up of Sea of Galilee.
When date-palm trees of Baisan stop bearing fruit (Sahih Muslim English reference : Book 41, Hadith 7028; Arabic
reference : Book 55, Hadith 7573)[10]
Worship of satan becomes common.
^^^ speaks for itself
Tuesday, 15 September 2015
Jesus vs Mahdi or Anti-Christ vs Dajjal?
With the way this world (Assiah) is going down the toilet, I thought I might throw this out...
Both Islam and Christianity have endtime scenarios, with Islam you have the appearance of the Dajjal and with Christianity you have the anti-Christ. Both are anti God and both will attempt to enslave the world, both will eventually meet a demise and end up in Hell. But the question to ask is 'Are they both the same being?'
Well, I look at it this way... If they are both the same being then they would be serving the same demon, but is this true? Seeing as Thaumiel has joint rulership between Lucifer (ha-Shaitan) and Moloch I would think that there can only be one ultimate ruler if Assiah was taken away from God and the Tree of Death was firmly established in its own right. So how would it be decided who was the sole god? Maybe in the same manner as a war game, or game of chess. No one player gets hurt in a game of chess, after all the pieces in the game only have a symbolic value and even if they were animated what do their lives matter anyway?
So if the bad guys of any revelation/doomsday scenario were to play their version of chess in order to decide the title of the Satan, then it would be a case of Anti-Christ vs Dajjal.
But such a game might not be compelling enough to enthrall the bystanders into being a compelled audience in the same manner as TV soaps, nor would it convince them to try and 'make it' into the game. So using some slick marketing much in the same way that occurs in soaps and say... professional wrestling the bad guys are now good and people will have favourites which they cheer and indeed devote their lives to for something to do.
So the producers turn the Anti-Christ into 'Jesus' returned and the Dajjal into 'Mahdi' and using some self projection propaganda have them accuse each other as being each other. Their supporter base would be:
Xtian Zionism (Jesus) vs Wahhabism (Mahdi)
So Lucifer and Moloch would pick a side and proceed to battle with the tite of Ha-Shaitan/Adam Satan as the prize.... actually that would only be a provisional prize because if Assiah is taken to the Tree of Death then the ultimate title would be 'god'.
Now this may seem a simple scenario but take into consideration that Abrahamic based faiths take in only about half of the worlds population. The rest are atheist/nontheist so what happens to them? What if there is third factor in all of this? I have previously written about a trinity situation (DisHoly trinity).
So maybe we could be looking at a scenario such as:
Bael as the father - because he is the father of the various baals
Moloch as the son - because he has done the 'return trip' as seen by his legion of abortion fanatics
Mammon as the spirit - this is a collective that causes monetary greed and would unite atheists to the cause because atheists are motivated by money above all things (it is the only thing they can hold as true)
As for Lucifer? He could be known as 'god' (which caused the rebellion in the first place) but it would only titular (in name only) much like most modern monarchs.
What would be the result of such a scenario?
Both Islam and Christianity have endtime scenarios, with Islam you have the appearance of the Dajjal and with Christianity you have the anti-Christ. Both are anti God and both will attempt to enslave the world, both will eventually meet a demise and end up in Hell. But the question to ask is 'Are they both the same being?'
Well, I look at it this way... If they are both the same being then they would be serving the same demon, but is this true? Seeing as Thaumiel has joint rulership between Lucifer (ha-Shaitan) and Moloch I would think that there can only be one ultimate ruler if Assiah was taken away from God and the Tree of Death was firmly established in its own right. So how would it be decided who was the sole god? Maybe in the same manner as a war game, or game of chess. No one player gets hurt in a game of chess, after all the pieces in the game only have a symbolic value and even if they were animated what do their lives matter anyway?
So if the bad guys of any revelation/doomsday scenario were to play their version of chess in order to decide the title of the Satan, then it would be a case of Anti-Christ vs Dajjal.
But such a game might not be compelling enough to enthrall the bystanders into being a compelled audience in the same manner as TV soaps, nor would it convince them to try and 'make it' into the game. So using some slick marketing much in the same way that occurs in soaps and say... professional wrestling the bad guys are now good and people will have favourites which they cheer and indeed devote their lives to for something to do.
So the producers turn the Anti-Christ into 'Jesus' returned and the Dajjal into 'Mahdi' and using some self projection propaganda have them accuse each other as being each other. Their supporter base would be:
Xtian Zionism (Jesus) vs Wahhabism (Mahdi)
So Lucifer and Moloch would pick a side and proceed to battle with the tite of Ha-Shaitan/Adam Satan as the prize.... actually that would only be a provisional prize because if Assiah is taken to the Tree of Death then the ultimate title would be 'god'.
Now this may seem a simple scenario but take into consideration that Abrahamic based faiths take in only about half of the worlds population. The rest are atheist/nontheist so what happens to them? What if there is third factor in all of this? I have previously written about a trinity situation (DisHoly trinity).
So maybe we could be looking at a scenario such as:
Bael as the father - because he is the father of the various baals
Moloch as the son - because he has done the 'return trip' as seen by his legion of abortion fanatics
Mammon as the spirit - this is a collective that causes monetary greed and would unite atheists to the cause because atheists are motivated by money above all things (it is the only thing they can hold as true)
As for Lucifer? He could be known as 'god' (which caused the rebellion in the first place) but it would only titular (in name only) much like most modern monarchs.
What would be the result of such a scenario?
Monday, 14 September 2015
Antitheism is solipsism
Being spending some time on youtube making clips, did this one where I point out that antitheism is solipsism.
Solipsism is the belief that you alone exist and everything else is a dream inside your head - an extreme form of narcissism. Looking at the celebrity atheists doing the rounds we can see that they are basically solipsists.
Solipsists basically rip off Christianity, Buddhism, Panentheism and Deism to justify to themselves that they are God.
Their 'holy trinity' is 'Me, Myself, I' and see themselves as Jesus... which in their mind explains why they are here on earth. And as we can see these psychos all claim to be our saviours.
Solipsism is the belief that you alone exist and everything else is a dream inside your head - an extreme form of narcissism. Looking at the celebrity atheists doing the rounds we can see that they are basically solipsists.
Solipsists basically rip off Christianity, Buddhism, Panentheism and Deism to justify to themselves that they are God.
Their 'holy trinity' is 'Me, Myself, I' and see themselves as Jesus... which in their mind explains why they are here on earth. And as we can see these psychos all claim to be our saviours.
Nihiltheism aka Western Atheism
Nihiltheism aka Western Atheism
Nihiltheism is the 'anti religion' of the west, to sum it up it is a belief in nothing, opposition to all established (natural) order and it is practiced as a religion (usually in a political and social context)
Nihiltheism consists of 3 parts which complement and supplement each other, these are:
1. Antitheism
2. Maltheism
3. Misotheism
Antitheism is the opposition to all religion and any practices that give praise or worship to God. It is specifically aimed at/against the God of Abraham, it aims at abolishing such worship or else rendering it void and invalid by corrupting it. This is being done by making religion to be political or social creeds instead of a spiritual faith.
Attacks against religion are not only external attacks but also internal, this can be seen in the way queers or their enablers use a religion to propagate things which are against the teachings of the prophets of that religion. In fact it is fair to say that religions splinter because of this, for example liberal churches will portray Jesus as a pro gay liberal or even claim that he is gay in order to push an agenda such as gay marriage. As for atheists? Well in regards to the non liberal churches atheists will scream that Jesus is a homophobic racist, imperialist etc. But the fact is that liberal churches are filled with the very same atheists and an example of this is the Unitarians, which should be registered as a political party or social club instead of a faith.
These xtians will call for unlimited immigration by muslims, in that regard they mean wahhabis. Now when you hear this sort of wailing you may ask yourself 'but wont these muslims kill the poofters the xtians want marriage for?'
However wahhabism is the islamic equivalent of liberal churches, the psychoticness of these two fronts actually drive people out of religion. Wahhabism is in the same manner as liberal churches and askhenazi judaism in that they will not expel their atheists as long as they do not renounce their faith in a formal manner. Looking at these three fronts they have caused the breakage of any common link between judaism, christianity and islam because they have propagated the God of Abraham as 3 different unrelated gods instead of one God.
Maltheism
Maltheism is the belief in God but God is percieved as a malevolent entity/being. Maltheism holds that known existence is held captive by a demiurge or lesser God - that lesser God being the God of Abraham. A maltheist has to hold a belief in panentheism because that could be the only way that the God of Abraham could hold us captive and prevent the 'real god' from 'liberating' us.
Maltheism is a branch of gnosticism so it comes with all manner of beliefs and rites which in occult terms are pretty watered down and worthless. In fact it is quite fair to say that the occult wisdom relating to maltheism is of no value whatsoever.
So what sort of people 'hold' the belief in maltheism? Actually it is western atheists (nihiltheists) who are the vast overwhelming majority of maltheists, sure there may possibly be a handful of people who subscribe to the ancient greek texts and see their opposition to God as a purely spiritual battle. But as for the rest it is a political/social/economic jihad against the world of the Abrahamic faiths, but it is not a jihad under the name of another god instead it is done under the name of no god.
Nihiltheists will adamantly declare there is no god and yet will fanatically vomit all sorts of venom about the God of Abraham, stupid crap like how he is a racist, homophobic, misogynist, neo nazi war criminal. In fact it is a psychotic hatred allegedly on behalf of nothing, hindus and non theist creeds such as Buddhism and Taoism do not scream hatred against the God of Abraham. You do not become a personal enemy to God and declare it so if you donot believe in the existence of God, the hatred shown by nihiltheists cannot be done on behalf of 'nothing'. However lets go back to gnostic maltheism, the question to ask is 'if the God of Abraham is a lesser god then who is the real god?'
The identity of this 'real god' is never revealed, it cannot be revealed by maltheists aka gnostic atheists because they do not understand what cause they serve. They are so fanatically consumed by hatred of God and embracing the dialectic of their cause that they cannot see any longterm end or consequences of their 'faith'. That is because they adhere to a faith which does not adhere to them, and as for the 'god' of maltheism?
Well.... give Lucifer (Ha-Shaitan) his due.....
Misotheism
Misotheism is just the outright hatred of God, it doesnt require a creed such as antitheism or maltheism as such but it is the glue that combines them to form nihiltheism. With misotheism nihiltheists can move effortlessly between antitheism and maltheism in order to justify whatever hatred they wish to indulge in.
For example... a maltheist should only be concerned with opposing the God of Abraham but they can use their misotheism to indulge in antitheism so as to oppose not only any Abrahamic religion but also to oppose rival religions such as Buddhism.
So misotheism is the hatred of God for the sake of hating God, some may say that it is just a satanic creed... but then again who is the satan of choice?
Karl Marx is the prophet of Lucifer as the Satan and the saint of antitheism as can be shown by his life which does imitate Lucifer with a shared level of vanity and self importance. The prophet of Moloch is Margaret Sanger and this is shown by the shared level of psychotic behaviour and bloodlust.
A question to ask is 'which black prophet has the biggest kill rate? Marx or Sanger?'
Marxisms murder rate has really gone down to a trickle compared to its heyday while Sangers continually increases with its army of fanatical abortionists. It is fair to say that there is a cold war rivalry between Lucifer and Moloch because they are joint rulers in Thaumiel, but if Assiah is taken by Ha-Shaitan (whoever holds that title) then there can only be one god in this scheme - not two.
Looking at the current situation it would seem that Moloch has the upper hand in this rivalry, not only does the abortion rate remain consistant and indeed increases but also the disposal of the fetus is done in a way to worship Moloch. The fetuses are incinerated just like children were incinerated in Moloch worship in ancient times, on top of that you have those who advocate for post birth abortion. Lucifer was never worshipped on earth or sacrificed to on such a massive scale as Moloch was and indeed still is. So what difference would we see if we were in the unfortunate position of being here if either Lucifer or Moloch became the 'god'?
In the case of Lucifer there initially would be little difference, the earth would be run like a fiefdom or an estate with a dictator or absolute monarch. It would not be pleasant but there would be order, but with Moloch it would be an absolute dystopia with no logic or reasoning. And do we not see this happening now? We have people going against the laws of nature, logic and reason because it is 'hip','gnarly' and 'cool'. People now take pride in their willing stupidity of which any consequences are seen to be 'funny'. People dont worry about consequences because they have no concept of them.
Margaret Sanger died a psychotic drunken junkie, she is not a hero and yet it is fashionable to portray her as one. If that is the case then why not put Pol Pot on $100 notes?
Nihiltheism is the 'anti religion' of the west, to sum it up it is a belief in nothing, opposition to all established (natural) order and it is practiced as a religion (usually in a political and social context)
Nihiltheism consists of 3 parts which complement and supplement each other, these are:
1. Antitheism
2. Maltheism
3. Misotheism
Antitheism is the opposition to all religion and any practices that give praise or worship to God. It is specifically aimed at/against the God of Abraham, it aims at abolishing such worship or else rendering it void and invalid by corrupting it. This is being done by making religion to be political or social creeds instead of a spiritual faith.
Attacks against religion are not only external attacks but also internal, this can be seen in the way queers or their enablers use a religion to propagate things which are against the teachings of the prophets of that religion. In fact it is fair to say that religions splinter because of this, for example liberal churches will portray Jesus as a pro gay liberal or even claim that he is gay in order to push an agenda such as gay marriage. As for atheists? Well in regards to the non liberal churches atheists will scream that Jesus is a homophobic racist, imperialist etc. But the fact is that liberal churches are filled with the very same atheists and an example of this is the Unitarians, which should be registered as a political party or social club instead of a faith.
These xtians will call for unlimited immigration by muslims, in that regard they mean wahhabis. Now when you hear this sort of wailing you may ask yourself 'but wont these muslims kill the poofters the xtians want marriage for?'
However wahhabism is the islamic equivalent of liberal churches, the psychoticness of these two fronts actually drive people out of religion. Wahhabism is in the same manner as liberal churches and askhenazi judaism in that they will not expel their atheists as long as they do not renounce their faith in a formal manner. Looking at these three fronts they have caused the breakage of any common link between judaism, christianity and islam because they have propagated the God of Abraham as 3 different unrelated gods instead of one God.
Maltheism
Maltheism is the belief in God but God is percieved as a malevolent entity/being. Maltheism holds that known existence is held captive by a demiurge or lesser God - that lesser God being the God of Abraham. A maltheist has to hold a belief in panentheism because that could be the only way that the God of Abraham could hold us captive and prevent the 'real god' from 'liberating' us.
Maltheism is a branch of gnosticism so it comes with all manner of beliefs and rites which in occult terms are pretty watered down and worthless. In fact it is quite fair to say that the occult wisdom relating to maltheism is of no value whatsoever.
So what sort of people 'hold' the belief in maltheism? Actually it is western atheists (nihiltheists) who are the vast overwhelming majority of maltheists, sure there may possibly be a handful of people who subscribe to the ancient greek texts and see their opposition to God as a purely spiritual battle. But as for the rest it is a political/social/economic jihad against the world of the Abrahamic faiths, but it is not a jihad under the name of another god instead it is done under the name of no god.
Nihiltheists will adamantly declare there is no god and yet will fanatically vomit all sorts of venom about the God of Abraham, stupid crap like how he is a racist, homophobic, misogynist, neo nazi war criminal. In fact it is a psychotic hatred allegedly on behalf of nothing, hindus and non theist creeds such as Buddhism and Taoism do not scream hatred against the God of Abraham. You do not become a personal enemy to God and declare it so if you donot believe in the existence of God, the hatred shown by nihiltheists cannot be done on behalf of 'nothing'. However lets go back to gnostic maltheism, the question to ask is 'if the God of Abraham is a lesser god then who is the real god?'
The identity of this 'real god' is never revealed, it cannot be revealed by maltheists aka gnostic atheists because they do not understand what cause they serve. They are so fanatically consumed by hatred of God and embracing the dialectic of their cause that they cannot see any longterm end or consequences of their 'faith'. That is because they adhere to a faith which does not adhere to them, and as for the 'god' of maltheism?
Well.... give Lucifer (Ha-Shaitan) his due.....
Misotheism
Misotheism is just the outright hatred of God, it doesnt require a creed such as antitheism or maltheism as such but it is the glue that combines them to form nihiltheism. With misotheism nihiltheists can move effortlessly between antitheism and maltheism in order to justify whatever hatred they wish to indulge in.
For example... a maltheist should only be concerned with opposing the God of Abraham but they can use their misotheism to indulge in antitheism so as to oppose not only any Abrahamic religion but also to oppose rival religions such as Buddhism.
So misotheism is the hatred of God for the sake of hating God, some may say that it is just a satanic creed... but then again who is the satan of choice?
Karl Marx is the prophet of Lucifer as the Satan and the saint of antitheism as can be shown by his life which does imitate Lucifer with a shared level of vanity and self importance. The prophet of Moloch is Margaret Sanger and this is shown by the shared level of psychotic behaviour and bloodlust.
A question to ask is 'which black prophet has the biggest kill rate? Marx or Sanger?'
Marxisms murder rate has really gone down to a trickle compared to its heyday while Sangers continually increases with its army of fanatical abortionists. It is fair to say that there is a cold war rivalry between Lucifer and Moloch because they are joint rulers in Thaumiel, but if Assiah is taken by Ha-Shaitan (whoever holds that title) then there can only be one god in this scheme - not two.
Looking at the current situation it would seem that Moloch has the upper hand in this rivalry, not only does the abortion rate remain consistant and indeed increases but also the disposal of the fetus is done in a way to worship Moloch. The fetuses are incinerated just like children were incinerated in Moloch worship in ancient times, on top of that you have those who advocate for post birth abortion. Lucifer was never worshipped on earth or sacrificed to on such a massive scale as Moloch was and indeed still is. So what difference would we see if we were in the unfortunate position of being here if either Lucifer or Moloch became the 'god'?
In the case of Lucifer there initially would be little difference, the earth would be run like a fiefdom or an estate with a dictator or absolute monarch. It would not be pleasant but there would be order, but with Moloch it would be an absolute dystopia with no logic or reasoning. And do we not see this happening now? We have people going against the laws of nature, logic and reason because it is 'hip','gnarly' and 'cool'. People now take pride in their willing stupidity of which any consequences are seen to be 'funny'. People dont worry about consequences because they have no concept of them.
Margaret Sanger died a psychotic drunken junkie, she is not a hero and yet it is fashionable to portray her as one. If that is the case then why not put Pol Pot on $100 notes?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)